Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 436–447 | Cite as

Roles of Seed Components in the Growth of Barley Seedlings under Salt Stress

  • W. Xue
  • A. Gianinetti
  • Y. Jiang
  • Z. Zhan
  • L. Kuang
  • G. Zhao
  • J. Yan
  • J. ChengEmail author


The cereal endosperm provides nutrients for seedling growth. The effects of seed components in seedling establishments under salt stress are, however, not yet fully explored. In this study, 60 barley recombinant inbred lines derived from Lewis × Karl cross were grown in four different environments, and the seed contents of starch, total soluble protein, phytate, total phenolics, total flavonoids and total inorganic phosphorus were determined in the harvested grains. Seeds of each line from the four environments were also assayed for seedling growth under saline treatments from 0 to 400 mM NaCl. Root and shoot lengths after 7 days decreased with increasing salt concentration. Correlations between seed components and either root or shoot length were established across the four seed sources. ANOVA showed a significant environment/source effect for both seed components and seedling growth, although the latter was less affected by the seed-production environment. Modeling seedling length across multiple salinities for each seed source showed that the environment with the most saline-tolerant root-growth curve was that associated the highest seed phosphorus content. Correlations between seed components and seedling growth traits highlighted phytate and total inorganic phosphorus as key components for seedling growth under moderate salinities. Seed phytate contents benefited seedling growth, even at high salinities, suggesting an additional role for this seed component under stressful growth conditions, possibly linked to its potential function as an osmolyte source.


seed component salt tolerance seedling multiple seed source phytate 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42976_2018_4603436_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (294 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 301 KB.


  1. Al-Karaki, G.N. 1997. Barley response to salt stress at varied levels of phosphorus. J. Plant Nutr. 20:1635–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andaya, V.C., Mackill, D.J. 2003. Mapping of QTLs associated with cold tolerance during the vegetative stage in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 54:2579–2585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hajlaoui, H., Ayeb, N.E., Garrec, J.P., Denden, M. 2010. Differential effects of salt stress on osmotic adjustment and solutes allocation on the basis of root and leaf tissue senescence of two silage maize (Zea mays L.) varieties. Ind. Crop. Prod. 31:122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hatzig, S.V., Frisch, M., Breuer, F., Nesi, N., Ducournau, S., Wagner, M.H., Leckband, G., Abbadi, A., Snowdon, R.J. 2015. Genome-wide association mapping unravels the genetic control of seed germination and vigor in Brassica napus. Front. Plant Sci. 6:221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Howard, T.P., Fahy, B., Craggs, A., Mumford, R., Leigh, F., Howell, P., Greenland, A., Smith, A.M. 2012. Barley mutants with low rates of endosperm starch synthesis have low grain dormancy and high susceptibility to preharvest sprouting. New Phyto. 194:158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hund, A., Fracheboud, Y., Soldati, A., Frascaroli, E., Salvi, S., Stamp, P. 2004. QTL controlling root and shoot traits of maize seedlings under cold stress. Theoret. Appl. Genetics. 109:618–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Joosen, R.V.L., Kodde, J., Willems, L.A.J., Ligterink, W., van der Plas, L.H.W., Hilhorst, H.W.M. 2010. Germinator: a software package for high-throughput scoring and curve fitting of Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J. 62:148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Joshi, R., Ramanarao, M.V., Baisakh, N. 2013. Arabidopsis plants constitutively overexpressing a myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase gene (SaINO1) from the halophyte smooth cordgrass exhibits enhanced level of tolerance to salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 65:61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaymak, H.C. 2012. The relationships between seed fatty acids profile and seed germination in cucurbit species. Zemdirbyste. 99:299–304.Google Scholar
  10. Klages, K., Boldingh, H., Smith, G.S. 1999. Accumulation of myo-inositol in actinidia seedlings subjected to salt stress. Ann. Bot. 84:521–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mansour, M.M.F. 2000. Nitrogen containing compounds and adaptation of plants to salinity stress. Biol. Plant. 43:491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meis, S.J., Fehr, W.R., Schnebly, S.R. 2003. Seed source effect on field emergence of soybean line with reduced phytate and raffinose saccharides. Crop Sci. 43:1336–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Michell, R.H. Evolution of the diverse biological roles of inositols. In: Biochem. Soc. Symp. 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nasri, N., Kaddour, R., Rabhi, M., Plassard, C., Lachaal, M. 2011. Effect of salinity on germination, phytase activity and phytate content in lettuce seedling. Acta Physiol. Plant. 33:935–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Piwowarczyk, B., Tokarz, K., Kamińska, I. 2016. Responses of grass pea seedlings to salinity stress in in vitro culture conditions. Plant Cell. Tiss. Org. 124:227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raboy, V. 2009. Approaches and challenges to engineering seed phytate and total phosphorus. Plant Sci. 177:281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Raychaudhuri, A., Majumder, A.L. 1996. Salinity-induced enhancement of L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Environ. 19:1437–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rose, T.J., Liu, L., Wissuwa, M. 2013. Improving phosphorus efficiency in cereal crops: Is breeding for reduced grain phosphorus concentration part of the solution? Front. Plant Sci. 4:444Google Scholar
  19. Saxena, S.C., Salvi, P., Kaur, H., Verma, P., Petla, B.P., Rao, V., Kamble, N., Majee, M. 2013. Differentially expressed myo-inositol monophosphatase gene (CaIMP) in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) encodes a lithium-sensitive phosphatase enzyme with broad substrate specificity and improves seed germination and seedling growth under abiotic stresses. J. Exp. Bot. 64:5623–5639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schneider, S., Schneidereit, A., Kai, R.K., Hajirezaei, M.R., Gramann, M., Hedrich, R., Sauer, N. 2006. Arabidopsis inositol transporter4 mediates high-affinity H+ symport of myoinositol across the plasma membrane. Plant Physiol. 141:565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Suzuki, M., Tanaka, K., Kuwano, M., Yoshida, K.T. 2007. Expression pattern of inositol phosphate-related enzymes in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Implications for the phytic acid biosynthetic pathway. Gene 405:55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Talbi Zribi, O., Abdelly, C., Debez, A. 2011. Interactive effects of salinity and phosphorus availability on growth, water relations, nutritional status and photosynthetic activity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Biol. 13:872–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tan, L., Chen, S., Wang, T., Dai, S. 2013. Proteomic insights into seed germination in response to environmental factors. Proteomics 13:1850–1870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Voigt, E.L., Almeida, T.D., Chagas, R.M., Ponte, L.F.A., Viégas, R.A., Silveira, J.A.G. 2009. Source-sink regulation of cotyledonary reserve mobilization during cashew (Anacardium occidentale) seedling establishment under NaCl salinity. J. Plant Physiol. 166:80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, F., Rose, T., Jeong, K., Kretzschmar, T., Wissuwa, M. 2016. The knowns and unknowns of phosphorus loading into grains, and implications for phosphorus efficiency in cropping systems. J. Exp. Bot. 67:1221–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. White, P.J., Veneklaas, E.J. 2012. Nature and nurture: the importance of seed phosphorus content. Plant Soil 357:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Witzel, K., Weidner, A., Surabhi, G.K., Varshney, R.K., Kunze, G., Buck-Sorlin, G.H., Börner, A., Mock, H.P. 2010. Comparative analysis of the grain proteome fraction in barley genotypes with contrasting salinity tolerance during germination. Plant Cell Environ. 33:211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu, E., Chen, M., He, H., Zhan, C., Cheng, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, Z. 2016. Proteomic analysis reveals proteins involved in seed imbibition under salt stress in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 7Google Scholar
  29. Xue, W., Yan, J., Zhao, G., Jiang, Y., Cheng, J., Cattivelli, L., Tondelli, A. 2017. A major QTL on chromosome 7HS controls the response of barley seedling to salt stress in the Nure × Tremois population. BMC Genet. 18:79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xue, W.T., Gianinetti, A., Wang, R., Zhan, Z.J., Yan, J., Jiang, Y., Fahima, T., Zhao, G., Cheng, J.P. 2016. Characterizing barley seed macro- and micro-nutrients under multiple environmental conditions. Cereal Res. Commun. 44:639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang, H., Irving, L.J., McGill, C., Matthew, C., Zhou, D., Kemp, P. 2010. The effects of salinity and osmotic stress on barley germination rate: sodium as an osmotic regulator. Ann. Bot. 106:1027–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang, M., Nyborg, M., McGill, W.B. 1990. Phosphorus concentration in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seed: Influence on seedling growth and dry matter production. Plant Soil 122:79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou, S., Sekizaki, H., Yang, Z.H., Sawa, S., Pan, J. 2010. Phenolics in the seed coat of wild soybean (Glycine soja) and their significance for seed hardness and seed germination. J. Agr. Food Chem. 58:10972–10978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhu, M., Zhou, M., Shabala, L., Shabala, S. 2015. Linking osmotic adjustment and stomatal characteristics with salinity stress tolerance in contrasting barley accessions. Funct. Plant Biol. 42:252–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Xue
    • 1
  • A. Gianinetti
    • 2
  • Y. Jiang
    • 3
  • Z. Zhan
    • 3
  • L. Kuang
    • 3
  • G. Zhao
    • 4
  • J. Yan
    • 4
  • J. Cheng
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Life SciencesGuizhou UniversityGuizhouChina
  2. 2.Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agrariaResearch Centre for Genomics and BioinformaticsFiorenzuola d’ArdaItaly
  3. 3.College of AgricultureGuizhou UniversityGuizhouChina
  4. 4.School of Pharmacy and BioengineeringChengdu UniversitySichuanChina

Personalised recommendations