Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 211–220 | Cite as

Associations between Plant Density and Yield Components Using Different Sowing Times in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

  • T. KissEmail author
  • K. Balla
  • J. Bányai
  • O. Veisz
  • I. Karsai


The yield potential of wheat depends not only on genetic × environmental interactions, but also on various agronomic factors such as sowing date or the seed rate used for sowing. The main aim of this work was to determine possible correlations between the effects of different sowing dates and plant densities on the yield components of a collection of 48 wheat genotypes. Two-way analysis of variance on the data revealed that both sowing date and plant density, as main components, only had a minor effect on the yield component patterns. Correlation analysis, however, indicated that the sowing date had a greater effect on the yield components, while plant density was in closer correlation with the heading time (r = 0.90). The patterns determined for individual yield components at two different sowing dates and plant densities showed significant differences for spike length, spike fertility, grain number in the main spike, number of productive tillers, grain number on side tillers, mean grain number and grain weight. Genotypes that carry the winter (recessive) alleles of genes regulating vernalisation processes (VRN-A1, VRN-B1, VRN-D1) and the sensitive (recessive) alleles of the two genes responsible for photoperiod sensitivity (PPD-B1, PPD-D1) may have better tillering and consequently higher grain yield, though this may depend greatly on the year.


seeding density yield components sowing time experiment wheat (T. aestivum L.) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42976_2018_4602211_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (164 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 168 KB.


  1. Araus, J.L., Slafer, G.A., Reynolds, M.P., Royo, C. 2002. Plant breeding and water relations in C3 cereals: what to breed for? Ann. Bot. 89:925–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beales, J., Turner, A., Griffiths, S., Snape, J.W., Laurie, D.A. 2007. A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1 a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 115:721–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Börner, A., Worland, A.J., Plaschke, J., Schumann, E., Law, C.N. 1993. Pleiotropic effects of genes for reduced height (Rht) and day-length insensitivity (Ppd) on yield and its components for wheat grown in middle Europe. Plant Breed. 111:204–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borras, G., Romagosa, I., van Eeuwijk, F., Slafer, G.A. 2009. Genetic variability in duration of pre-heading phases and relationships with leaf appearance and tillering dynamics in a barley population. Field Crops Res. 113:95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y., Carver, B.F., Wang, S., Zhang, F., Yan, L. 2009. Genetic loci associated with stem elongation and winter dormancy release in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118:881–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Y., Carver, B.F., Wang, S., Cao, S., Yan, L. 2010. Genetic regulation of developmental phases in winter wheat. Mol. Breed. 26:573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Díaz, A., Zikhali, M., Turner, A.S., Isaac, P., Laurie, D.A. 2012. Copy number variation affecting the Photoperiod-B1 and Vernalization-A1 genes is associated with altered flowering time in wheat (Triticum aestivum). PLoS ONE 7:e33234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubcovsky, J., Lijavetzky, D., Appendino, L., Tranquilli, G. 1998. Comparative RFLP mapping of Triticum monococcum genes controlling vernalization requirement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:968–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faure, S., Higgins, J., Turner, A., Laurie, D.A. 2007. The FLOWERING LOCUS T-like gene family in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Genetics 176:599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu, D., Szűcs, P., Yan, L., Helguera, M., Skinner, J.S., von Zitzewitz, J., Hayes, P.M., Dubcovsky, J. 2005. Large deletions within the first intron in VRN-1 are associated with spring growth habit in barley and wheat. Mol. Gen. Genom. 273:54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gonzalez, F.G., Slafer, G.A., Miralles, D.J. 2002. Vernalization and photoperiod response in wheat pre-flowering reproductive phases. Field Crops Res. 74:183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonzalez, F.G., Slafer, G.A., Miralles, D.J. 2003. Grain and floret number in response to photoperiod during stem elongation in fully and slightly vernalized wheats. Field Crops Res. 81:17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez, F.G., Slafer, G.A., Miralles, D.J. 2005. Photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat: is its impact on fertile floret and grain number determination similar to that of radiation? Functional Plant Biol. 32:181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kabesh, M.O., El-Kramany, M.F., Sary, G.A., El-Naggar, H.M., Gehan, S.H.B. 2009. Effects of sowing methods and some bio-organic fertilization treatments on yield and yield components of wheat. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 5:97–102.Google Scholar
  15. Kato, K., Miura, H., Sawada, S. 2000. Mapping QTLs controlling grain yield and its components on chromosome 5A of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:1114–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiss, T., Balla, K., Bányai, J., Veisz, O., Karsai, I. 2014. Effect of different sowing times on the plant developmental parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Res. Commun. 42:239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiss, T., Balla, K., Veisz, O., Karsai, I. 2011. Elaboration of a non-destructive methodology for establishing plant developmental patterns in cereals. Acta Agron. Hung. 59:293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Law, C.N., Sutka, J., Worland, A.J. 1978. A genetic study of day-length response in wheat. Heredity 41:575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McIntosh, R.A., Hart, G.E., Devos, K.M., Gale, M.D., Rogers, W.J. 1998. Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. In: Slinkard, A.E. (ed.), Proc. 9th Int. Wheat Genet. Symp. Vol. 5. Univ. Extension Press. Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, pp. 1–235.Google Scholar
  20. Miralles, D.J., Richards, R.A. 2000. Responses of leaf and tiller emergence and primordium initiation in wheat and barley to interchanged photoperiod. Ann. Bot. 85:655–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakano, H., Morita, S. 2009. Effects of seeding rate and nitrogen application rate on yield and protein content of the bread wheat cultivar ‘Minaminokaori’ in Southwestern Japan. Plant Prod. Sci. 12:109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pan, Q.Y., Sammons, D.J., Kratochil, R.J. 1994. Optimizing seeding rate for late-seed winter wheat in the Middle Atlantic Region. J. Prod. Agri. 7:221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pugsley, A.T. 1971. A genetic analysis of the spring-winter habit of growth in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 22:21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pugsley, A.T. 1972. Additional genes inhibiting winter habit in wheat. Euphytica 21:547–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ragasits, I. 1998. Vetésidő (Planting date). In: Ragasits, I. (ed.), Búzatermesztés (Wheat Production). Mezőgazda Kiadó. Budapest, Hungary. pp. 104–107. (in Hungarian)Google Scholar
  26. Slafer, G.A., Rawson, H.M. 1994. Sensitivity of wheat phasic development to major environmental factors: a re-examination of some assumptions made by physiologists and modellers. Aust. J. Plant. Phys. 21:393–426.Google Scholar
  27. Slafer, G.A., Calderini, D.F., Miralles, D.J. 1996. Yield components and compensation in wheat: opportunities for further increasing yield potential. In: Reynolds, M.P., Rajaram, S., McNab, A. (eds), Increasing Yield Potential in Wheat: Breaking the Barriers. CIMMYT. Mexico DF, Mexico. pp. 101–133.Google Scholar
  28. Snape, J.W., Law, C.N., Parker, B.B., Worland, A.J. 1985. Genetical analysis of chromosome 5A of wheat and its influence on important agronomic characters. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71:518–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tottman, D.R., Makepeace, R.J. 1979. An explanation of the decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations. Ann. Appl. Biol. 93:221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whitechurch, E.M., Slafer, G.A. 2001. Responses to photoperiod before and after jointing in wheat substitution lines. Euphytica 118:47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Whitechurch, E.M., Slafer, G.A., Miralles, D.J. 2007. Variability in the duration of stem elongation in wheat genotypes and sensitivity to photoperiod and vernalization. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193:131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilson, J.A., Swanson, A.F. 1962. Effect of plant spacing on the development of winter wheat. Agron. J. 54:327–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Worland, A.J. 1996. The influence of flowering time genes on environmental adaptability in European wheats. Euphytica 89:49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yan, C.P., Zhang, Y.Q., Zhang, D.Y., Dang, J.Y. 2008. Effects of sowing date and planting density on the grain’s protein component and quality of strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars. J. Applied. Ecol. 19:1733–1740.Google Scholar
  35. Yan, L., Helguera, M., Kato, K., Fukuyama, S., Sherman, J., Dubcovsky, J. 2004. Allelic variation at the VRN-1 promoter region in polyploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109:1677–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang, F.P., Zhang, X.K., Xia, X.C., Laurie, D.A., Yang, W.X., He, Z.H. 2009. Distribution of the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a allele in Chinese wheat cultivars. Euphytica 165:445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Kiss
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. Balla
    • 1
  • J. Bányai
    • 1
  • O. Veisz
    • 1
  • I. Karsai
    • 1
  1. 1.Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural ResearchHungarian Academy of SciencesMartonvásárHungary

Personalised recommendations