Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 67–78 | Cite as

Exogenous Application of Humic Acid Mitigates Salinity Stress in Maize (Zea mays L.) Plants by Improving some Key Physico-biochemical Attributes

  • C. Kaya
  • N. A. AkramEmail author
  • M. Ashraf
  • O. Sonmez
Physiology

Abstract

Application of salt stress (100 mM) through root growing medium caused a considerable decrease in plant fresh and dry biomass, maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), chlorophyll contents, leaf water potential, and leaf Ca, K, P and N concentrations of two maize cultivars (Apex 836 and DK 5783). However, salt-induced increase was observed in leaf osmolality (LO), proline, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA), Na+ concentration and activities of enzymatic antioxidants, such as catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Of five humic acid (HA) levels used under non-stress and stress conditions in an initial experiment, 100 mg L−1 was chosen for subsequent studies. Exogenous application of humic acid (HA) at the rate of 100 mM as a foliar or pre-sowing seed treatment significantly increased the plant biomass, Fv/Fm, chlorophyll pigments and proline contents, while it considerably reduced the leaf water potential, H2O2 and MDA contents as well as the activities of all the afore-mentioned enzymatic antioxidants. Of both modes of exogenous treatment, foliar spray was better in improving plant biomass, chlorophyll contents, LO, leaf Na+ as well as the accumulation of all nutrients measured, however, in contrast, seed pre-treatment was more effective in altering leaf proline, H2O2 and MDA contents. Of both maize cultivars, cv. DK 5783 excelled in plant biomass, chlorophyll contents and leaf N, Ca and K concentrations as well as in the activities of all three antioxidant enzymes, whereas cv. Apex 836 was superior in leaf Na+ and P concentrations, H2O2 and MDA contents. Cv. DK 5783 was comparatively better in salt tolerance as compared to cv. Apex 836. Overall, exogenous application of HA was effective in improving salinity tolerance of maize plants which can be attributed to HA-induced increase in plant biomass, chlorophyll contents, mineral nutrients and activities of key antioxidant enzymes.

Keywords

salt stress humic acid antioxidants maize exogenous application 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK-TOVAG-112O375).

Supplementary material

42976_2018_4601067_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (205 kb)
Exogenous Application of Humic Acid Mitigates Salinity Stress in Maize (Zea mays L.) Plants by Improving some Key Physico-biochemical Attributes

References

  1. Akram, N.A., Ashraf, M. 2011. Improvement in growth, chlorophyll pigments and photosynthetic performance in salt-stressed plants of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by foliar application of 5-aminolevulinic acid. Agrochimica 55:94–104.Google Scholar
  2. Aminifard, M.H., Aroiee, H., Ameri, A., Fatem, H. 2012. Effect of plant density and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and fruit quality of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 7:859–866.Google Scholar
  3. Arfan, M., Athar, H.R., Ashraf, M. 2007. Does exogenous application of salicylic acid through the rooting medium modulate growth and photosynthetic capacity in two differently adapted spring wheat cultivars under salt stress? J. Plant Physiol. 164:685–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arjumend, T., Abbasi, M.K., Rafique, E. 2015. Effects of lignite-derived humic acid on some selected soil properties, growth and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under greenhouse conditions. Pak. J. Bot. 47:2231–2238.Google Scholar
  5. Ashraf, M. 2009. Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnol. Adv. 27:84–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashraf, M., Harris, P.J.C. 2013. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica 51:163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aydin, A., Kant, C., Tyran, M. 2012. Humic acid application alleviate salinity stress of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants decreasing membrane leakage. Afric. J. Agric. Res. 7:1073–1086.Google Scholar
  8. Bakry, B.A., Taha, M.H., Abdelgawad, Z.A., Abdallah, M.M.S. 2014. The role of humic acid and proline on growth, chemical constituents and yield quantity and quality of three flax cultivars grown under saline soil conditions. Agric. Sci. 5:1566–1575.Google Scholar
  9. Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P., Teare, I.D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beauchamp, C., Fridovich, I. 1971. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 44:276–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradford, M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chance, M., Maehly, A.C. 1955. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Enzymol. 2:764–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapman, H.D., Pratt, P.F. 1982. Methods of Plant Analysis. I. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Water. Chapman Publishers. Riverside, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Chinnusamy, V., Jagendorf, A., Zhu, J.K. 2005. Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci. 45:437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cimrin, K.M., Türkmen, O., Turan, M., Tuncer, B. 2010. Phosphorus and humic acid application alleviate salinity stress of pepper seedlings. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 9:5845–5851.Google Scholar
  16. Daur, I., Bakhashwain, A.A. 2013. Effect of humic acid on growth and quality of maize fodder production. Pak. J. Bot. 45:21–25.Google Scholar
  17. Dionisio-Sese, M.L., Tobita, S. 1998. Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Sci. 135:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farouk, S. 2011. Osmotic adjustment in wheat flag leaf in relation to flag leaf area and grain yield per plant. J. Stress Physiol. Biochem. 7:117–138.Google Scholar
  19. Fasaei, R.G. 2013. Influence of foliar application of salicylic acid and soil application of humic materials on cucumber and chickpea grown on a nutrient deficient soil. Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 5:2639–2644.Google Scholar
  20. Gama, P.B.S., Inanaga, S., Tanaka, K., Nakazawa, R. 2007. Physiological response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings to salinity stress. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 6:79–88.Google Scholar
  21. Gupta, K., Jha, B., Agarwal, P.K. 2014. A dehydration-responsive element binding (DREB) transcription factor from the succulent halophyte Salicornia brachiate enhances abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Marine Biotechnol. 16:657–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanachi, S., Van Labeke, M.C., Mehouachi, T. 2014. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence to screen eggplant (Solanum melangenum L.) cultivars for salt tolerance. Photosynthetica 52:57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hasanuzzaman, M., Hossain, M.A., Fujita, M. 2011. Nitric oxide modulates antioxidant defense and the methylglyoxal detoxification system and reduces salinity-induced damage of wheat seedlings. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 5:353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hasanuzzaman, M., Hossain, M.A., Fujita, M. 2012. Exogenous selenium pretreatment protects rapeseed seedlings from cadmium-induced oxidative stress by upregulating antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification systems. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 149:248–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson, M.L. 1962. Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs. New York, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Jamil, M., Bashir, S., Anwar, S., Bibi, S., Bangash, A., Farman U., Shikrha, E. 2012. Effect of salinity on physiological and biochemical characteristics of different varieties of rice. Pak. J. Bot. 44:7–13.Google Scholar
  27. Karakurt, Y., Ozdamar-Unlu, H., Unlu, H., Tonguc, M. 2015. Antioxidant compounds and activity in cucumber fruit in response to foliar and soil humic acid application. Eur. J. Hort. Sci. 80:76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaya, C., Ashraf, M., Sonmez, O. 2015. Promotive effect of exogenously applied thiourea on key physiological parameters and oxidative defense mechanism in salt-stressed Zea mays L. plants. Turk. J. Bot. 39:786–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kesba, H.H., El-Beltagi, H.S. 2012. Biochemical changes in grape rootstocks resulted from humic acid treatments in relation to nematode infection. Asian Pacific J. Tropical Biomedicine 2:287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khaled, H., Fawy, H.A. 2011. Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil Water Res. 6:21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khodarahmpour, Z., Ifar, M., Motamedi, M. 2012. Effects of NaCl salinity on maize (Zea mays L.) at germination and early seedling stage. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11:298–304.Google Scholar
  32. Kiran, S., Ozkay, F., Kusvuran, S., Ellialtioglu, S.S. 2014. The effect of humic acid applications on some morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics of eggplants irrigated with water contained heavy metals in high concentration. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2:280–288.Google Scholar
  33. Kraus, T.E., Fletcher, R.A. 1994. Paclobutrazol protects wheat seedlings from heat and paraquat injury. Is detoxification of active oxygen involved? Plant Cell Physiol. 35:45–52.Google Scholar
  34. Liu, X.M., Nguyen, X.C., Kim, K.E., Han, H.J., Yoo, J., Lee, K., Kim, M.C., Yun, D.J., Chung, W.S. 2013. Phosphorylation of the zinc finger transcriptional regulator ZAT6 by MPK6 regulates Arabidopsis seed germination under salt and osmotic stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 430:1054–1059.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loreto, F., Velikova, V. 2001. Isoprene produced by leaves protects the photosynthetic apparatus against ozone damage, quenches ozone products, and reduces lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes. Plant Physiol. 127:1781–1787.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Masciandaro, G., Ceccanti, B., Ronchi, V., Benedicto, S., Howard, L. 2002. Humic substances to reduce salt effect on plant germination and growth. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 33:365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayi, A.A., Ibrahim, Z.R., Abdurrahman, A.S. 2014. Effect of foliar spray of humic acid, ascorbic acid, cultivars and their interactions on growth of olive (Olea europea L.) transplants cvs. Khithairy and Sorany. J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 7:18–30.Google Scholar
  38. Meganid, A.S., Al-Zahrani, H.S., El-Metwally, S.M. 2015. Effect of humic acid application on growth and chlorophyll contents of common bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under salinity stress conditions. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci., Engineer. Technol. 4:2652–2660.Google Scholar
  39. Mehmood, E., Kausar, R., Akram, M., Shahzad, S.M. 2009. Is boron required to improve rice growth and yield in saline environment? Pak. J. Bot. 41:1339–1350.Google Scholar
  40. Memon, S.A., Hou, X., Wang, L.J. 2010. Morphological analysis of salt stress response of pakchoi. Electronic J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 9:248–254.Google Scholar
  41. Mohamed, W.H. 2012. Effects of humic acid and calcium forms on dry weight and nutrient uptake of maize plant under saline condition. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 6:597–604.Google Scholar
  42. Mora, V., Olaetxea, M., Bacaicoa, E., Baigorri, R., Fuentes, M., Zamarreno, A.M., Garcia-Mina, J.M. 2014. Abiotic stress tolerance in plants: exploring the role of nitric oxide and humic substances. In: Lamattina, L., Polacco, J.C. (eds), Nitric Oxide in Plants: Metabolism and Role in Stress Physiology. Springer. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Munns, R., Tester, M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59:651–681.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Osman, A.S.H., Rady, M.M. 2014. Effect of humic acid as an additive to growing media to enhance the production of eggplant and tomato transplants. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 89:237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Qados, A.M.S.A. 2011. Effect of salt stress on plant growth and metabolism of bean plant Vicia faba (L.). J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 10:7–15.Google Scholar
  46. Rady, M.M., Abd El-Mageed, T.A., Abdurrahman, H.A., Mahdi, A.H. 2016. Humic acid application improves field performance of cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) under saline conditions. J. Animal Plant Sci. 26:487–493.Google Scholar
  47. Salama, A.M., Mona, A.E. 2016. Morphological and anatomical studies of grafting cucumber onto three different wild rootstocks grown under salinity in nutrient film technique system. Int. J. Adv. Res. 4:583–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Selim, E.M., Shaymaa, I.S., Faiz, F.A., El-Neklawy, A.S. 2012. Interactive effects of humic acid and water stress on chlorophyll and mineral nutrient contents of potato plants. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 8:531–537.Google Scholar
  49. Sevengor, S., Yasar, F., Kusvuran, S., Ellialtioglu, S. 2011. The effect of salt stress on growth, chlorophyll content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzymes of pumpkin seedling. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6:4920–4924.Google Scholar
  50. Shafiq, S., Akram, N.A., Ashraf, M. 2015. Does exogenously-applied trehalose alter oxidative defense system in the edible part of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) under water-deficit conditions? Sci. Hort. 85:68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Siddiqi, E.H., Ashraf, M. 2008. Can leaf water relation parameters be used as selection criteria for salt tolerance in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)? Pak. J. Bot. 40:221–228.Google Scholar
  52. Siler, B., Misic, D., Filipovic, B., Popovic, Z., Cvetic, T., Mijovic, A. 2007. Effects of salinity on in vitro growth and photosynthesis of common centaury (Centaurium erythraea Rafn.). Archives Biol. Sci. 59:129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singh, S.N., Singh, A.K., Singh, S.C., Sharma, M.L., Kumar, R. 2011. Enhancing sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) productivity by integrating organic, inorganic and biological sources of N in sub-tropical India. Indian J. Sugar Technol. 26:14–15.Google Scholar
  54. Strain, H.H., Svec, W.A. 1966. Extraction, separation, estimation and isolation of chlorophylls. In: Vernon, L.P., Seely, G.R. (eds), The Chlorophylls. Academic Press. New York, USA. pp. 21–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Szopko, D., Darkó, E., Molnár, I., Kruppa, K., Háló, B., Vojtkó, A., Molnár-Láng, M., Dulai, S. 2017. Photosynthetic responses of a wheat (Asakaze)-barley (Manas) 7H addition line to salt stress. Photosynthetica 55:317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taffouo, V.D., Kouamou, J.K., Ngalangue, L.M.T., Ndjeudji, B.A.N., Akoa, A. 2009. Effects of salinity stress on growth, ions partitioning and yield of some cowpea (Vignaun giuculata L., Walp) cultivars. Int. J. Bot. 5:135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tuna, A.L., Kaya, C., Ashraf, M., Altunlu, H., Yokas, I., Yagmur, B. 2007. The effects of calcium sulphate on growth, membrane stability and nutrient uptake of tomato plants grown under salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59:173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turan, M.A., Kalkat, V., Taban, S. 2007. Salinity-induced stomatal resistance, proline, chlorophyll and ion concentrations of bean. Int. J. Agric. Res. 2:483–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weisany, W., Sohrabi, Y., Heidari, G., Siosemardeh, A., Ghassemi-Golezani, K. 2012. Changes in antioxidant enzymes activity and plant performance by salinity stress and zinc application in soybean (Glycine max L.). Plant Omics J. 5:60–67.Google Scholar
  60. Winicov, I., Seemann, J.R. 1990. Expression of genes for photosynthesis and the relationship to salt tolerance of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 31:1155–1161.Google Scholar
  61. Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Taylor, J.L., Jiang, Z., Zhang, S., Mei, F., Wu, Y., Wu, P., Ni, J. 2015. Aequorin-based luminescence imaging reveals differential calcium signalling responses to salt and reactive oxygen species in rice roots. J. Exp. Bot. 66:2535–2545.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhu, J.K. 2007. Plant Salt Stress. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgricultureHarran UniversitySanliurfaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of BotanyGovernment College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  3. 3.Pakistan Science FoundationIslamabadPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, DeveliUniversity of ErciyesKayseriTurkey

Personalised recommendations