Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 158–168 | Cite as

Straw Yield and Quality: An Extra Motivation for the Introduction of Triticale in Mixed Farming Systems

  • V. DeryckeEmail author
  • S. Landschoot
  • K. Dewitte
  • E. Wambacq
  • J. Latré
  • G. Haesaert
Agronomy

Abstract

Straw is a valuable by-product from cereal production. It is used for agricultural purposes as feed and bedding material for livestock. Additionally, cereal straw is a resource for the production of sustainable biomaterials and bio-energy. To meet the demands of these sectors substantial amounts of straw, with specific properties (e.g. water-holding capacity), are necessary. Since wheat breeding has mainly focused on grain yield rather than on straw yield other cereal species, such as triticale, can be of interest. Therefore, in this research the straw yield and water-holding capacity of four winter wheat and four winter triticale varieties were studied during two growing seasons. For both wheat and triticale there were differences in dry matter yield and percentage dry matter between growing seasons. Furthermore, depending on the growing season, there were significant differences in straw yield between the different wheat and triticale varieties. However, during both growing seasons, the straw yield obtained from the triticale varieties was significantly higher compared to the straw yield obtained from the wheat varieties. Concerning the water-holding capacity, it was concluded that the water absorption potential of triticale straw was higher compared to the water absorption potential of wheat straw. However, only in 2014 a significant difference between wheat and triticale was noted. So, it can be concluded that, besides the known advantages of triticale (performance on marginal soils, disease resistance, low fertilizer input, etc.), this crop has the potential to deliver high yields of high quality straw.

Keywords

straw triticale water-holding capacity wheat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Landbouwcentrum Granen Vlaanderen vzw. Furthermore, we acknowledge the technical staff of the experimental farm in Bottelare.

References

  1. Alijošius, S., Švirmickas, G.J., Bliznikas, S., Gruzauskas, R., Šašyte, V., Raceviciute-Stupeliene, A., Klisevičiute, V., Dauksiene, A. 2016. Grain chemical composition of different varieties of winter cereals. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 103:273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dai, J., Bean, B., Brown, B., Bruening, W., Edwards, J., Flowers, M., Karow, R., Lee, C., Morgan, G., Ottman, M., Ransom, J., Wiersma, J. 2016. Harvest index and straw yield of five classes of wheat. Biomass and Bioenergy 85:223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deininger, A., Tamm, M., Krause, R., Sonnenberg, H. 2000. Penetration resistance and water-holding capacity of differently conditioned straw for deep litter housing systems. J. of Agric. Engineering Res. 77:335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Derycke, V., Haesaert, G. 2014. Rassenonderzoek triticale 2014. Landbouwcentrum Granen Vlaanderen (LCG) vzw (Triticale variety trial results 2014. Agricultural Centre for Cereal Research vzw), pp. 1–5. Online available at: http://www.lcg.begranen/teeltinfo/rassenonderzoek/rassen/. (in Dutch)
  5. Derycke, V., Haesaert, G. 2015. Rassenonderzoek triticale 2015. Landbouwcentrum Granen Vlaanderen (LCG) vzw (Triticale variety trial results 2015. Agricultural Centre for Cereal Research vzw), pp. 1–4. Online available at: http://www.lcg.begranen/teeltinfo/rassenonderzoek/rassen/. (in Dutch)
  6. Donaldson, E., Schillinger, W.F., Dofing, S.M. 2001. Straw production and grain yield relationships in winter wheat. Crop Sci. 41:100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Estrada-Campuzanoa, G., Slafer, G.A., Miralles, D.J. 2012. Differences in yield, biomass and their components between triticale and wheat grown under contrasting water and nitrogen environments. Fields Crops Res. 128:167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engel, R.E., Long, D.S., Carlson, G.R. 2003. Predicting straw yield of hard red spring wheat. Agron. J. 95:1454–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haesaert, G., Latré, J., Derycke, V. 2007. Activiteitenverslag 2007 van de proefveldwerking te Bottelare. Rassenvergelijking triticale (Activity report of the experimental farm at Bottelare 2007. Triticale variety trial results). Bottelare, Belgium. pp. 2–4. (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  10. Haesaert, G., Latré, J., Derycke, V. 2009. Activiteitenverslag 2009 van de proefveldwerking te Bottelare. Rassenvergelijking triticale (Activity report of the experimental farm at Bottelare 2009. Triticale variety trial results). Bottelare, Belgium. pp. 2–4. (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  11. Larsen, S.U., Bruun, S., Lindedam, J. 2012. Straw yield and saccharification potential for ethanol in cereal species and wheat cultivars. Biomass and Bioenergy 45:239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lou, Y., Xu, M., Wang, W., Sun, X., Zhao, K. 2011. Return rate of straw residue affects soil organic C sequestration by chemical fertilization. Soil Tillage Res. 113:70–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Myer, R., Lozano del Rio, A.J. 2004. Triticale as animal feed. In: Mergoum, M., Gómez-Macpherson H. (eds), Triticale Improvement and Production. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No. 179. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. Rome, Italy. pp. 49–58.Google Scholar
  14. Pearson, E.G., Leavengood, S., Reeb, J.E. 1999. Comparison of the absorptive capacity if the animal bedding materials: Western Juniper, Western red cedar, and Douglas fir. Oregon State University. 233 Magruder Hull, Corvallis, OR, USA.Google Scholar
  15. R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. URL. http://www.R-project.org.
  16. Shaver, R., Hoffman, P. 2010. Use of straw in dairy cattle diets. Focus on Forage 12:2–10.Google Scholar
  17. Sinkevičienė, A., Jodaugienė, D., Pupalienė, R., Urbonienė, M. 2009. The influence of organic mulches on soil properties and crop yield. Agron. Res. 7:485–491.Google Scholar
  18. Spiehs, M.J., Brown-Brandl, T.M., Jaderborg, J.P., DiCostanzo, A., Purswell, J.L., Davis, J.D. 2013. Water holding capacity and evaporative loss from organic bedding materials used in livestock facilities. In: Proc. Am. Soc. of Agric. and Biol. Engineers Annual Int. Meeting, July 21–24, 2013. Kansas City, MO. ASABE Paper No. 131595738. [doi: http://dx.doi.org10.13031/aim.20131595738].
  19. Sun, R.-C. 2010. Cereal Straw as a Resource for Sustainable Biomaterials and Biofuels. Elsevier. Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Stallknecht, G.F., Gilbertson, K.M., Ranney, J.E. 1996. Alternative wheat cereals as food grains: Einkorn, emmer, spelt, kamut, and triticale. In: Janick, J. (ed.), Progress in New Crops. ASHS Press. Alexandria, VA, USA. pp. 156–170.Google Scholar
  21. Townsend, T.J., Sparkes, D.L., Wilson, P. 2017. Food and bioenergy: reviewing the potential of dual-purpose wheat crops. GCB Bioenergy 9:525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tuyttens, F.A.M. 2005. The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: A review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Si. 92:261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wei, T., Zhang, P., Wang, K., Ding, R., Yang, B., Nie, J., Jia, Z., Han, Q. 2015. Effects of wheat straw incorporation on the availability of soil nutrients and enzyme activities in Semiarid Areas. PLoS ONE 10: e0120994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Derycke
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Landschoot
    • 1
  • K. Dewitte
    • 1
  • E. Wambacq
    • 1
  • J. Latré
    • 2
  • G. Haesaert
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Science and Technology, University College GhentBottelareBelgium

Personalised recommendations