SSR Marker Aided Introgression for opaque2 Allele for Development of Quality Protein Maize Inbreds
Maize protein quality is deficit in essential amino acids, lysine and tryptophan. These constraints of o2 (opaque2) are corrected in genetically improved, hard endosperm QPM (Quality Protein Maize). An integrated strategy of phenotypic selection for endosperm modifiers and molecular marker-assisted foreground and background selection has been used in present study. The QPM donors were, CML 161, DMRQPM 58, CML 176 and CML 141 whereas, normal maize inbreds were CM 212, V338, V361, V336, V341, V351, CM 141 and V335. The inbreds were subjected to parental polymorphism survey between non-QPM and QPM using CIMMYT based three SSR markers, viz. phi057, umc1066 and phi112. Two markers, viz. phi057 and umc1066 exhibited co-dominant reactions, while phi112 was dominant in nature. Finally, two combinations V335 × CML 141 and V351 × CML 141 were considered for conversion program. Foreground selection was exercised using o2 specific marker umc1066 in BC1 and BC2 generations, while background as well as foreground selection was exercised in BC2F3 generation to recover the genome of recurrent parent up to extent of 80 to 100% with the help of SSR markers distributed across the whole maize genome. The tryptophan concentration in endosperm protein was significantly enhanced and the converted maize lines had almost twice the amount of lysine and tryptophan than normal maize inbreds.
Keywordsbackground and foreground selection lysine opaque2 QPM tryptophan
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Hernandez, H.H., Bates, L.S. 1969. A modified method for rapid tryptophan analysis in maize. CIMMYT Research Bulletin No. 13. CIMMYT. Mexico, D.F., Mexico.Google Scholar
- Krivanek, A., Groote, H., Gunaratna, N., Diallo, A., Freisen, D. 2007. Breeding and disseminating quality protein maize for Africa. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 6:312–324.Google Scholar
- Prasanna, B.M., Vasal, S.K., Kasahun. B., Singh, N.N. 2001. Quality protein maize. Curr. Sci. 81:1308–1319.Google Scholar
- Ram, L. 2014. Improvement of non QPM lines through introgression of QPM genes. PhD Thesis, BHU. Varanasi, India.Google Scholar
- Ram, L., Singh, R., Singh, S.K. 2015. Study of combining ability using QPM donors as testers for yield and its component traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Sabrao J. Breeding and Genetics. 47:99–112.Google Scholar
- Singh, R., Srivastava, R.P. 2015. New quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for turcicum leaf blight in maize. J. of Biotech. Crop Sci. 5:35–43.Google Scholar
- Sofi, P.A., Wani, S.A., Rather, A.G., Wani, S.H. 2009. Quality protein maize (QPM): genetic manipulation for the nutritional fortification of maize. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 1:244–253.Google Scholar
- Vasal, S.K. 2001. High quality protein corn. In: Hallauer, A.R. (ed.), Specialty Corns. Second Edition. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 85–129.Google Scholar
- Villegas, E., Mertz, T.E. 1975. Simple chemical and biological methods used at Purdue University to evaluate cereals for protein quality. St. Bull 70:17–21.Google Scholar
- Villegas, E., Ortega, E., Bauer, R. 1984. Chemical methods used at CIMMYT for determining protein quality in corn. CIMMYT. Mexico.Google Scholar
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.