Zn and Fe Concentration Variations of Grain and Flag Leaf and the Relationship with NAM-G1 Gene in Triticum timopheevii (Zhuk.) Zhuk. ssp. timopheevii
Grains of 12 accessions of Triticum timopheevii (Zhuk.) Zhuk. ssp. timopheevii (AAGG, 2n = 4x = 28) and one bread wheat cultivar Chinese Spring (CS) and one durum wheat cultivar Langdon (LDN) grown across two years were analyzed for grain iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) concentrations. All the 12 tested T. timopheevii ssp. timopheevii genotypes showed significantly higher concentration of grain Fe and Zn than CS and LDN. Aboundant genetic variability of both the Fe and Zn concentrations was observed among the T. timopheevii ssp. timopheevii accessions, averagely varied from 47.06 to 90.26 mg kg−1 and from 30.05 to 65.91 mg kg−1, respectively. Their grain Fe and Zn concentrations between years exhibited a significantly positive correlation with the correlation coefficients r = 0.895 and r = 0.891, respectively, indicating the highly genetic stability. Flag leaf possessed twice or three times higher concentrations for both Fe and Zn than grain, and a significantly high positive correlation appeared between the two organs with r = 0.648 for Fe and r = 0.957 for Zn concentrations, respectively, suggesting flag leaves might be indirectly used for evaluating grain Zn and Fe contents. Significant correlations occurred between grain Fe and Zn concentrations, and between grain Zn concentration and the two agronomic traits of plant height and number of spikelets per spike. Both the concentrations were not related to seed size or weight as well as NAM-G1 gene, implying the higher grain Fe and Zn concentrations of T. timopheevii ssp. timopheevii species are not ascribed to concentration effects of seed and the genetic control of NAM-G1 gene. There might be some other biological factors impacting the grain’s Zn and Fe concentrations. These results indicated T. timopheevii ssp. timopheevii species might be a promising genetic resource with high Fe and Zn concentrations for the biofortification of current wheat cultivars.
KeywordsT. timopheevii ssp. timopheevii iron zinc NAM-G1 gene biofortification
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- FAO 2002. The state of food insecurity in the world. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
- Gomez-Becerra, H.F., Yazici, A., Ozturk, L., Budak, H., Peleg, Z., Morgounov, A., Fahima, T., Saranga, Y., Cakmak, I. 2010b. Genetic variation and environmental stability of grain mineral nutrient concentrations in Triticum dicoccoides under five environments. Euphytica 171:39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sun, L., Yao, F., Li, C., Li, L., Liu, B., Gao, Q. 2001. RAPD analysing of CMS-T, K, V mtDNAs and cloning of mtDNA fragments associated with CMS-K in wheat. Acta Agrono. Sinica 27:144–148.Google Scholar
- Velu, G., Singh, R.P., Huerta-Espino, J., Peña, R.J., Arun, B., Mahendru-Singh, A., Yaqub Mujahid, M., Sohu, V.S., Mavi, G.S., Crossa, J., Alvarado, G., Joshi, A.K., Pfeiffer, W.H. 2012. Performance of biofortified spring wheat genotypes in target environments for grain zinc and iron concentrations. Field Crop. Res. 137:261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.