Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 401–410 | Cite as

The Proteome Response of “Hordeum marinum” to Long-term Salinity Stress

  • A. Boustani
  • F. FatehiEmail author
  • R. Azizinezhad
Article

Abstract

Salinity is a major constraint to crop productivity and mechanisms of plant responses to salinity stress are extremely complex. “Hordeum marinum” is a salt tolerant barley species, which could be a good source to evaluate salt-tolerance patterns. Proteomics is a powerful technique to identify proteins involved in plant adaptation to stresses. We applied a proteomic approach to better understanding the mechanism of plant responses to salinity in a salt-tolerant genotype of barley. At the 4-leaf stage, plants were exposed to 0 (control treatment) or 300 mM NaCl (salt treatment). Salt treatment was maintained for 3 weeks. Total proteins of leaf 4 were extracted and separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. More than 290 protein spots were reproducibly detected. Of these, 20 spots showed significant changes to salt treatment compared to the control: 19 spots were upregulated and 1 spot was absent. Using MALDI-TOF/TOF MS, we identified 20 cellular proteins which represented 11 different proteins and were classified into five categories. These proteins were involved in various cellular functions. Upregulation of proteins which involved in protein processing (ribosomal protein, cullin family, cp31AHv protein and RNA recognition motif (RRM) superfamily), photosynthesis (Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco) and Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase (rubisco activase)), energy metabolism (cytosolic malate dehydrogenase (cyMDH) and fructokinase), oxygen species scavenging and defense (cystatin and thioredoxin) may increase plant adaptation to salt stress.

Keywords

barley Hordeum marinum proteomics salinity two-dimensional gel electrophoresis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42976_2017_4503401_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (703 kb)
The Proteome Response of “Hordeum marinum” to Long-term Salinity Stress

References

  1. Abraham, Z., Martinez, M., Carbonero, P., Diaz, I. 2006. Structural and functional diversity within the cystatin gene family of Hordeum vulgare. J. Exp. Bot. 15:4245–4255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alikhani, M., Khatabi, B., Sepehri, M., Khayam Nekouei, M., Mardi, M., Hosseini Salekdeh, G. 2013. A proteomics approach to study the molecular basis of enhanced salt tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) conferred by the root mutualistic fungus Piriformospora indica. Mol. BioSystems 9:1498–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayram, E., Yilmaz, S., Hamad-Mecbur, H., Kartal, G., Gozukirmizi, N. 2012. Nikita retrotransposon movements in callus cultures of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Omics 5:211–215.Google Scholar
  4. Beritognolo, I., Harfouche, A., Brilli, F., Prosperini, G., Gaudet, M., Brosché, M., Salani, F., Kuzminsky, E., Auvinen, P., Paulin, L., Kangasjärvi, J., Loreto, F., Valentini, R., Mugnozza, G.S., Sabatti, M. 2011. Comparative study of transcriptional and physiological responses to salinity stress in two contrasting Populus alba L. genotypes. Tree Physiol. 12:1335–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budak, H., Akpinar, B.A., Unver, T., Turktas, M. 2013. Proteome changes in wild and modern wheat leaves upon drought stress by two-dimensional electrophoresis and nano LC-ESI-MS/MS. Plant. Mol. Biol. 83:89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caruso, G., Cavaliere, C., Foglia, P., Gubbiotti, R., Samperi, R., Laganà, A. 2009. Analysis of drought responsive proteins in wheat (Triticum durum) by 2D-PAGE and MALDI TOF mass spectrometry. Plant Sci. 177:570–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chattopadhyay, A., Subba, P., Pandey, A., Bhushan D., Kumar, R., Datta, A., Chakraborty, S., Chakraborty, N. 2011. Analysis of the grasspea proteome and identification of stress-responsive proteins upon exposure to high salinity, low temperature, and abscisic acid treatment. Phytochem. 72:1293–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng, Z., Dong, K., Ge, P., Bian, Y., Dong, L., Deng, X., Li, X., Yan, Y. 2015. Identification of leaf proteins differentially accumulated between wheat cultivars distinct in their levels of drought tolerance. PLoS ONE 10:e0125302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cui, Y.P., Lu, X.K., Wang, D.L., Wang, J.J., Yin, Z.J., Fan, W.L., Wang, S., Ye, W.W. 2015. Comparative analysis of salinity-induced proteomic changes in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agricult. Sci. 6:78–86.Google Scholar
  10. De Abreu, C.E., Araújo Gdos, S., Monteiro-Moreira, A.C., Costa, J.H., Leite Hde, B., Moreno, F.B., Prisco, J.T., Gomes-Filho, E. 2014. Proteomic analysis of salt stress and recovery in leaves of Vigna unguiculata cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 33:1289–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darko, E., Janda, T., Majlath, I., Szopko, D., Dulai, S., Molnar, I., Turkosi, E., Molnar-Lang, M. 2015. Salt stress response of wheat–barley addition lines carrying chromosomes from the winter barley ‘‘Manas’’. Euphytica 3:491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding, Y., Q-H, Ma. 2004. Characterization of a cytosolic malate dehydrogenase cDNA which encodes an isozyme toward oxaloacetate reduction in wheat. Biochimie 86:509–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fatehi, F., Hosseinzadeh, A., Alizadeh, H., Brimavandi, T., Struik, P.C. 2012a. The proteome response of salt-resistant and salt-sensitive barley genotypes to long-term salinity stress. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39:6387–6397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fatehi, F., Hosseinzadeh, A., Alizadeh, H., Brimavandi, T. 2012b. The proteome response of Hordeum spontaneum to salinity stress. Cereal Res. Commun. 41:78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fulda, S., Mikkat, S., Stegmann, H., Horn, R. 2011. Physiology and proteomics of drought stress acclimation in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Biol. (Stuttgart) 13:632–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garthwaite, A.J., Von Bothmer, R., Colmer, T.D. 2005. Salt tolerance in wild Hordeum species associated with restricted entry of Na+ and Cl into the shoots. J. Exp. Bot. 56:2365–2378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Görg, A., Postel, W., Günther, S. 1988. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 9:531–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Granot, D., Kelly, G., Stein, O., David-Schwartz, R. 2013. Substantial roles of hexokinase and fructokinase in the effects of sugars on plant physiology and development. J. Exp. Bot. 65:809–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo, L., Nezames, C.D., Sheng, L., Deng, X., Wei, N. 2013. Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase family in plant abiotic stress pathways. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 55:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo, J., Ling, H., Wu, Q., Xu, L., Que, Y. 2014. The choice of reference genes for assessing gene expression in sugarcane under salinity and drought stresses. Sci. Reports 4:7042–7053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Islam, S., Malik, A.I., Islam, A.K.M.R., Colmer, T.D. 2007. Salt tolerance in a Hordeum marinum–Triticum aestivum amphiploid, and its parents. J. Exp. Bot. 58:1219–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ji, W., Cong, R., Li, S., Li, R., Qin, Z., Li, Y., Zhou, X., Chen, S., Li, J. 2016. Comparative proteomic analysis of soybean leaves and roots by iTRAQ provides insights into response mechanisms to short-term salt stress. Plant Sci. 7:573.Google Scholar
  23. Klotz, K.L., Finger, F.L., Anderson, M.D. 2006. Wounding increases glycolytic but not soluble sucrolytic activities in stored sugarbeet root. Postharvest Biol. and Technol. 41:48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma, Y., Cheng, Z., Wang, W., Sun, Y. 2007. Proteomic analysis of high yield rice variety mutated from space-flight. Adv. Space Res. 40:535–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma, Y., He, P., Sun, H., Zhao, G., Dai, H., Zhang, Z. 2010. Isolation and characterization of transcriptionally active Ty1-copia retrotransposons in Fragaria × ananassa. Agricult. Sci. in China 9:337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marchler-Bauer, A., Derbyshire, M.K., Gonzales, N.R., Lu, S., Chitsaz, F., Geer, L.Y., Geer, R.C., He, J., Gwadz, M., Hurwitz, D.I., Lanczycki, C.J., Lu, F., Marchler, G.H., Song, J.S., Thanki, N., Wang, Z., Yamashita, R.A., Zhang, D., Zheng, C., Bryant, S.H. 2015. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Research. 43:222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Møller, A.L.B., Pedas, P., Andersen, B., Svensson, B., Schjoerring, J.K., Finnie, C. 2011. Responses of barley root and shoot proteomes to long-term nitrogen deficiency, short-term nitrogen starvation and ammonium. Plant Cell Environ. 34:2024–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Munns, R., Tester, M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. J. 59:651–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neto, A.P., Favarin, J.L., Reis, A.R., Tezotto, T., Almeida, R.E.M., Lavres, J.J., Gallo, L.Z. 2015. Nitrogen metabolism in coffee plants in response to nitrogen supply by fertigation. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 27:41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raines, C.A. 2011. Increasing photosynthetic carbon assimilation in C3 plants to improve crop yield: Current and future strategies. Plant Physiol. 155:36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reiner, T., Hoefle, C., Hückelhoven, R. 2016. A barley SKP1-like protein controls abundance of the susceptibility factor RACB and influences the interaction of barley with the barley powdery mildew fungus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17:184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rich, B.E., Steitz, J.A. 1987. Human acidic ribosomal phosphoproteins P0, P1, and P2: analysis of cDNA clones, in vitro synthesis, and assembly. Mol. Cell Biol. 7:4065–4074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roach, M., Gerber, L., Sandquist, D. 2012. Fructokinase is required for carbon partitioning to cellulose in aspen wood. The Plant J. 70:967–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sobhanian, H., Razavizadeh, R., Nanjo, Y., Ehsanpour, A., Rastgar Jazii, F., Motamed, N., Komatsu, S. 2010. Proteome analysis of soybean leaves, hypocotyls and roots under salt stress. Proteome Sci. 8:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, G., Tian, L., Aziz, N., Broun, P., Dai, X., He, J., King, A., Zhao, P.X., Dixon, R.A. 2008. Terpene biosynthesis in glandular trichomes of hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Plant Physiol. 148:1254–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Witzel, K., Weidner, A., Surabhi, G.K., Börner, A., Mock, H.P. 2009. Salt stress-induced alterations in the root proteome of barley genotypes with contrasting response towards salinity. J. Exp. Bot. 60:3545–3557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yao, Y.X., Dong, Q.L., Zhai, H., You, C.X., Hao, Y.J. 2011. The functions of an apple cytosolic malate dehydrogenase gene in growth and tolerance to cold and salt stresses. Plant Physiol. and Biochem. 49:257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang, C.J., Zhao, B.C., Ge, W.N., Zhang, Y.F., Song, Y., Sun, D.Y., Guo, Y. 2011. An apoplastic H-type thioredoxin is involved in the stress response through regulation of the apoplastic reactive oxygen species in rice. Plant Physiol. 157:1884–1899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zorb, C., Schmitt, S., Muhling, K.H. 2011. Proteomic changes in maize roots after short-term adjustment to saline growth conditions. Proteomics 10:4441–4449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2017

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant Breeding Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of AgriculturePayame Noor University (PNU)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations