Effect of Shading on Biomass and N Mass Partitioning in Paddy Rice Seedlings through Allometric Analysis


An allometric analysis of biomass and N mass allocation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings under non-shaded (100% of full sunlight) and shaded (30% of full sunlight) treatments were conducted. The allometric slopes and the intercepts were estimated using standardized major axis regression. Results indicated that biomass was preferentially allocated to stems during plant ontogeny, and leaves and roots were isometric when rice seedlings were not shaded. Under shade, however, more biomass was allocated to leaves and stems. N mass allocation was also altered by shading in that more N mass was allocated to the aerial shoots, and plants accumulated less N mass when shaded. Our study revealed that both biomass and N mass were in accordance with the optimal partitioning theory.


  1. Aikio, S., Rämö, K., Manninen, S. 2009. Dynamics of biomass partitioning in two competing meadow plant species. Plant Ecol. 205:129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bahn, M., Lattanzi, F.A., Hasibeder, R., Wild, B., Koranda, M., Danese, V., Brüggemann, N., Schmitt, M., Siegwolf, R., Richter, A. 2013. Responses of belowground carbon allocation dynamics to extended shading in mountain grassland. New Phytol. 198:116–126.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernacchi, C.J., Thompson, J.N., Coleman, J.S., Mcconnaughay, K.D.M. 2007. Allometric analysis reveals relatively little variation in nitrogen versus biomass accrual in four plant species exposed to varying light, nutrients, water and CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 30:1216–1222.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloom, A.J., Mooney, H.A. 2003. Resource limitation in plants – an economic analogy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:363–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans, G.C. 1972. The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth. University of California Press, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gedroc, J.J., McConnaughay, K.D.M., Coleman, J.S. 1996. Plasticity in root/shoot: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Func. Ecol. 10:44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geng, Y.P., Pan, X.Y., Xu, C.Y., Zhang, W.J., Li, B., Chen, J.K. 2007. Plasticity and ontogenetic drift of biomass allocation in response to above- and below-ground resource availabilities in perennial herbs: a case study of Alternanthera philoxeroidesL. Ecol. Res. 22:255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemaire, G., Salette, J. 1984. Relation entre dynamique de croissance et dynamique de prelevement d’azote pour un peuplement de graminees fourrageres. I. Etude de l’effet du milieu (Relationship between growth and nitrogen uptake in a pure grass stand. I. Environmental effects). Agronomie 4:423–430. (in French)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McConnaughay, K.D.M., Coleman, J.S. 1999. Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80:2581–2593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Normand, F., Bissery, C., Damour, G., Lauri, P.-E. 2008. Hydraulic and mechanical stem properties affect leaf–stem allometry in mango cultivars. New Phytol. 178:590–602.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Poorter, H., Niklas, K.J., Reich, P.B., Oleksyn, J., Poot, P., Mommer, L. 2012. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems, and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environment control. New Phytol. 193:30–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poorter, H., Jagodzinski, A.M., Ruiz-Peinado, R., Kuyah, S., Luo, Y., Oleksyn, J., Usoltsev, V.A., Buckley, T.N., Reich, P.B., Sack, L. 2015. How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents. New Phytol. 208:736–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sadras, V.O., Lemaire, G. 2014. Quantifying crop nitrogen status for comparisons of agronomic practices and genotypes. Field Crop. Res. 164:54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Semchenko, M., Zobel, K. 2005. The effect of breeding on allometry and phenotypic plasticity in four varieties of oat (Avena sativaL.). Field Crop. Res. 93:151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Warton, D.I., Wright, I.J., Falster, D.S., Westoby, M. 2006. Bivariate line fitting methods for allometry. Biol. Rev. 81:259–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. West, G.B., Brown, J.H., Enquist, B.J. 1997. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276:122–126.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. W. Li.

Additional information

Communicated by R.K. Behl

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, F., Li, J., Wang, X.L. et al. Effect of Shading on Biomass and N Mass Partitioning in Paddy Rice Seedlings through Allometric Analysis. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 45, 346–354 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.45.2017.016

Download citation


  • optimal partitioning theory
  • ontogeny
  • paddy rice
  • standardized major axis regression