Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 225–233 | Cite as

Enhanced Light Intensity Increases Flavonol and Anthocyanin Concentrations but Reduces Flavone Levels in the Cotyledons of Common Buckwheat Seedlings

  • H. Dębski
  • W. Wiczkowski
  • D. Szawara-Nowak
  • N. Bączek
  • M. Szwed
  • M. HorbowiczEmail author


The effects of two light intensities on the concentration of several flavonoids were investigated in the cotyledons of common buckwheat seedlings. The study was performed on four days old seedlings of cvs. Hruszowska, Panda, Kora and Red Corolla. One group of seedlings was grown under exposure to 180 ± 20 μmol · m−2 · s−1 photosynthetically active radiation, whereas the other group was exposed to 360 ± 20 μmol · m−2 · s−1. The experiment lasted 5 days. The results revealed that light intensity induces changes in the levels of flavonols and flavones. Increased light intensity contributed to a decrease in the concentrations of all flavone C-glucosides: orientin (luteolin-8-C-glucoside) and iso-orientin (luteolin-6-C-glucoside), and apigenin: vitexin (apigenin-8-C-glucoside) and iso-vitexin (apigenin-6-C-glucoside). Simultaneously, a substantial increase in the content of flavonols, i.e. quercetin O-glycosides, was found. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence to demonstrate the contrary responses of plant flavonols and flavones to light intensity. The content of anthocyanin also increased under exposure to higher light intensity. Our results indicate that quercetin O-glycosides can play a similar role to anthocyanins in the cotyledons of common buckwheat seedlings. Results of correlation analysis indicate that the increase in flavonol and anthocyanin concentrations in response to higher light intensity is maintained through reduced accumulation of flavones and proanthocyanidins.


common buckwheat seedling light intensity flavonoids 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42976_2017_4502225_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (142 kb)
Enhanced Light Intensity Increases Flavonol and Anthocyanin Concentrations but Reduces Flavone Levels in the Cotyledons of Common Buckwheat Seedlings


  1. Agati, G., Tattini, M. 2010. Multiple functional roles of flavonoids in photoprotection. New Phytol. 186:786–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakhshi, D., Arakawa, O. 2006. Induction of phenolic compounds biosynthesis with light irradiation in the flesh of red and yellow apples. J. Appl. Hort. 8:101–104.Google Scholar
  3. Bergquist, S., Gertsson, U., Nordmark, L.Y., Olsson, M.E. 2007. Effects of shade nettings, sowing time and storage on baby spinach flavonoids. J. Sci. Food Agric. 87:2464–2471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burchard, P., Bilger, W., Weissenböck, G. 2000. Contribution of hydroxycinnamates and flavonoids to epidermal shielding of UV-A and UV-B radiation in developing rye primary leaves as measured by ultraviolet-induced chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Plant Cell Env. 23:1373–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Del Rio, D., Rodriguez-Mateos, A., Spencer, J.P.E., Tognolini, M., Borges, G., Crozier, A. 2013. Dietary (poly) phenolics in human health: Structures, bioavailability, and evidence of protective effects against chronic diseases. Antioxid. Redox Sign. 18:1818–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fallovo, C., Schreiner, M., Schwarz, D., Colla, G., Krumbein, A. 2011. Phytochemical changes induced by different nitrogen supply forms and radiation levels in two leafy Brassicaspecies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59:4198–4207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghasemzadeh, A., Jaafar, H.Z.E., Rahmat, A. 2010. Synthesis of phenolics and flavonoids in ginger (Zingiber officinaleRoscoe) and their effects on photosynthesis rate. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 11:4539–4555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gould, K.S. 2004. Nature’s Swiss army knife: The diverse protective roles of anthocyanins in leaves. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 5:314–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta, N., Sharma, S.K., Rana, J.C., Chauhan, R.S. 2011. Expression of flavonoid biosynthesis genes vis-à-vis rutin content variation in different growth stages of Fagopyrumspecies. J. Plant Physiol. 168:2117–2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hemm, M.R., Rider, S.D., Ogas, J., Murry, D.J., Chapple, C. 2004. Light induces phenylpropanoid metabolism in Arabidopsis roots. Plant J. 38:765–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horbowicz, M., Wiczkowski, W., Koczkodaj, D., Saniewski, M. 2011. Effects of methyl jasmonate on accumulation of flavonoids in seedlings of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentumMoench). Acta Biol. Hung. 62:265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horbowicz, M., Wiczkowski, W., Szawara-Nowak, D., Sawicki, T., Kosson, R., Sytykiewicz, H. 2015. The level of flavonoids and amines in de-etiolated and methyl jasmonate treated seedlings of common buckwheat. Phytochem. Lett. 13:15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaakola, L., Hohtola, A. 2010. Effect of latitude on flavonoid biosynthesis in plants. Plant Cell Env. 33:1239–1247.Google Scholar
  14. Kalinová, J., Dadáková, E. 2006. Varietal and year variation of rutin content in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentumMoench). Cereal Res. Commun. 34:1315–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalinová, J., Dadáková, E. 2012. Influence of sowing date and stand density on rutin level in buckwheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 41:348–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, S.J., Kawaharada, C., Suzuki, T., Saito, K., Hashimoto, N., Takigawa, S., Yamauchi, H. 2006. Effect of natural light periods on rutin, free amino acid and vitamin C contents in the sprouts of common (Fagopyrum esculentumMoench) and tartary (F. tataricumGaertn.) buckwheats. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 12:199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu, C.Z., Guo, C., Wang, Y.C., Ouyang, F. 2002. Effect of light irradiation on hairy root growth and artemisinin biosynthesis of Artemisia annua. Process. Biochem. 38:581–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Løvdal, T., Olsen, K.M., Slimestad, R., Verheul, M., Lillo, C. 2010. Synergetic effects of nitrogen depletion, temperature, and light on the content of phenolic compounds and gene expression in leaves of tomato. Phytochem. 71:605–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ma, Z., Li, S., Zhang, M., Jiang, S., Xiao, Y. 2010. Light intensity affects growth, photosynthetic capability, and total flavonoid accumulation of Anoectochilusplants. Hort. Sci. 45:863–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martens, S., Mithöfer, A. 2005. Flavones and flavone synthases. Phytochem. 66:2399–2407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neugart, S., Fiol, M., Schreiner, M., Rohn, S., Zrenner, R., Kroh, L.W., Krumbein, A. 2013. Low and moderate photosynthetically active radiation affects the flavonol glycosides and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives in kale (Brassica oleraceavar. sabellica) dependent on two low temperatures. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 72:161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ohnishi, O. 1990. Analyses of genetic variants in common buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentumMoench: a review. Fagopyrum 10:12–22.Google Scholar
  23. Suzuki, T., Morishita, T., Kim, S.J., Park, S.U., Woo, S.H., Noa, T., Takigawa, S. 2015. Physiological roles of rutin in the buckwheat plant. Jpn. Agr. Res. Quart. 49:37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wiczkowski, W., Szawara-Nowak, D., Dębski, H., Mitrus, J., Horbowicz, M. 2014. Comparison of flavonoids profile in sprouts of common buckwheat cultivars and wild tartary buckwheat. Int. J. Food. Sci. Tech. 49:1977–1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Winkel-Shirley, B. 2001. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 126:485–493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu, Y., Wang, G., Cao, F., Zhu, C., Wang, G., El-Kassaby, Y.A. 2014. Light intensity affects the growth and flavonol biosynthesis of ginkgo (Ginkgo bilobaL.). New Forest 45:765–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zoratti, L., Karppinen, K., Luengo Escobar, A., Häggman, H., Jaakola, L. 2014. Light-controlled flavonoid biosynthesis in fruits. Front. Plant Sci. 5:534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Dębski
    • 1
  • W. Wiczkowski
    • 2
  • D. Szawara-Nowak
    • 2
  • N. Bączek
    • 2
  • M. Szwed
    • 1
  • M. Horbowicz
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Faculty of Natural SciencesSiedlce University of Natural Sciences and HumanitiesSiedlcePoland
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and Biodynamics of FoodInstitute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of Polish Academy of SciencesOlsztynPoland

Personalised recommendations