The grouping of locations from local-scale multi-environmental trials (METs) into mega-environments has been criticized. Some European countries, e.g. the Czech Republic, Poland and Germany, have been characterized as possessing homogeneous environmental conditions. For aligned environmental conditions, it has been assumed that cultivar rankings will be similar and consequently cannot be used to designate mega-environments. An example of METs at the local scale is the Polish Post Registration Variety Testing System. The objective of this study was to determine groups of test sites within 16 Polish regions which are characterized by similar yield ranking of 50 winter wheat cultivars over three growing seasons (2011–2013). The compatibility of these cultivar yield rankings across regions was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients. Thereby, the 16 regions were divided into six groups (mega-environments) of locations. Regions within each group have similar cultivar rankings, whereas between groups, we observed different cultivar rankings, indicating crossover interactions. Besides similar cultivar yield responses the regions within mega-environments were characterized also by similar environmental (soil and/or climate) conditions.
Annicchiarico, P., Bellah, F., Chiari, T. 2005. Defining subregions and estimating benefits for a specific-adaptation strategy by breeding programs: A case study. Crop Sci. 45:1741–1749.
Atlin, G.N., Baker, R.J., McRae, K.B., Lu, X. 2000. Selection response in subdivided target regions. Crop Sci. 40:7–13.
Atlin, G.N., McRae, K.B. 1994. Resource allocation in Maritime cereal cultivar trials. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74:501–505.
Burgueño, J., Crossa, J., Cotes, J.M., Vicente, F.S., Das, B. 2011. Prediction assessment of linear mixed models for multi-environment trials. Crop Sci. 51:944–954.
Barrero Farfan, I.D., Murray, S.C., Labar, S., Pietsch, D. 2013. A multi-environment trial analysis shows slight grain yield improvement in Texas commercial maize. Field Crop Res. 149:167–176.
Ebdon, J.S., Gauch, H.G. 2002. Additive main effect and multiplicative interactions analysis of national turf-grass performance trials. Interpretation of genotype×environment interactions. Crop Sci. 42:489–496.
Federer, W.T., King, F. 2007. Variations on Split Plot and Split Block Experiment Designs. John Wiley and Sons. New York, USA.
Gauch, H.G., Zobel, R.W. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37:311–326.
Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B.J., Cullis, B.R., Thompson, R. 2009. ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK.
Hu, X., Yan, S., Shen, K. 2013. Heterogeneity of error variance and its influence on genotype comparison in multi-location trials. Field Crop Res. 149:322–328.
Kelly, A.M., Smith, A.B., Eccleston, J.A., Cullis, B.R. 2007. The accuracy of varietal selection using factor analytic models for multi-environment plant breeding trials. Crop Sci. 47:1063–1070.
Liu, S.M., Constable, G.A., Reid, P.E., Stiller, W.N., Cullis, B.R. 2013. The interaction between breeding and crop management in improved cotton yield. Field Crop Res. 148:49–60.
Mądry, W., Paderwski, J., Gozdowski, D., Rozbici, J., Golba, J., Piechociński, M., Studnicki, M., Derejko, A. 2013. Adaptation of winter wheat cultivars to crop managements and Polish agricultural environments. Turkish J. Field Crop 18:118–127.
Mandal, N.P., Sinha, P.K., Variar, M., Shukla, V.D., Perraju, P., Mehta, A., Pathak, A.R., Dwivedi, J.L., Rathi, S.P.S., Bhandarkar, S., Singh, B.N., Singh, D.N., Panda, S., Mishra, N.C., Singh, Y.V., Pandya, R. 2010. Implications of genotype×input interactions in breeding superior genotypes for favourable and unfavourable rainfed upland environments. Field Crop Res. 118:135–144.
Mohammadi, R., Roustaii, M., Haghparast, R., Roohi, E., Solimani, K., Ahmadi, M., Abedi, R., Amri, A. 2010. Genotype × environment interactions for grain yield in rainfed winter multi-environment trials in Iran. Agron. J. 102:1500–1510.
Möhring, J., Piepho, H.P. 2009. Comparison of weighting in two-stage analyses of series of experiments. Crop Sci. 49:1977–1988.
Munaro, L.B., Benin, G., Marchioro, V.S., de Assis Franco, F., Silva, R.R., de Silva, C.L., Beche, E. 2014. Brazilian spring wheat homogeneous adaptation regions can be dissected in major mega-environments. Crop Sci. 54:1374–1383.
Mühleisen, J., Piepho, H.P., Maurer, H.P., Zhao, Y., Reif, J.C. 2014. Exploitation of yield stability in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 127:1949–1962.
Patterson, H.D., Thompson, R. 1971. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58:545–554.
Piepho, H.P., Möhring, J., Schulz-Streeck, T., Ogutu, J.O. 2012. A stage-wise approach for analysis of multi-environment trials. Biom. J. 54:844–860.
Seber, G.A.F. 2004. Multivariate Observations. John Wiley and Sons. New York, USA.
Smith, A.B., Cullis, B.R., Thompson, R. 2001. Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics 57:1138–1147.
Smith, A.B., Cullis, B.R., Thompson, R. 2005. The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. J. Agric. Sci. 143:449–462.
Studnicki, M., Mądry, W., Derejko, A., Noras, K., Wójcik-Gront, E. 2015. Four-way data analysis within the linear mixed modelling framework. Sci. Agric. 72:411–419.
Tapley, M., Ortiz, B.V., van Santen, E., Balkcom, K.S., Mask, P., Weaver, D.B. 2013. Location, seeding date, and variety interactions on winter wheat yield in South-eastern United States. Agron. J. 105:509–518.
Welham, S.J., Cullis, B.R., Gogel, B.J., Gilmour, A.R., Thompson, R. 2004. Prediction in linear mixed models. Aust. NZ. J. Stat. 46:325–347.
Wu, H.X., Matheson, A.C. 2004. General and specific combining ability from partial diallels of radiata pine: implications for utility of SCA inbreeding and deployment populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108:1503–1512.
Communicated by H. Grausgruber
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Derejko, A., Studnicki, M., Mądry, W. et al. A Comparison of Winter Wheat Cultivar Rankings in Groups of Polish Locations. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 44, 628–638 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.44.2016.029
- G×E interaction
- multi-environmental trial
- Triticum aestivum