Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 141–152 | Cite as

Northern Leaf Blight Response of Elite Maize Inbred Lines Adapted to the Mid-altitude Sub-humid Tropics

  • W. Abera
  • H. ShimelisEmail author
  • J. Derera
  • M. Worku
  • M. Laing
Physiology

Abstract

Productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) is curtailed by a number of stress factors, predominantly by diseases and insect pests. The Northern leaf blight disease of maize caused by Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) Leonard and Suggs inflict significant yield losses in the humid tropical regions. The objectives of this study were to determine the leaf blight response of 50 elite maize inbred lines developed for the mid-altitude, sub-humid tropics and to select promising parents for resistance breeding. Inbred lines were evaluated in the field using a 5 × 10 alpha lattice design with three replications. Plants were artificially inoculated at the 4–6 leaf stages during 2011 and 2012. Data on disease severity and incidence, AUDPC and yields were recorded. Inbred lines had significant differences for E. turcicum reactions, and were classified into resistant, intermediate or susceptible categories. The mean disease severity ranged from 2.04% for the inbred line 136-a to 3.25% (Kuleni-C1-101-1-1-1). The upper leaf area infection of inbred lines 143-5-I and 136-a was 3.3%, while the line Kuleni-C1-101-1-1-1 displayed 100% infection. Further, 136-a developed the lowest AUDPC score at 238, whereas Kuleni-C1-101-1-1-1 had the maximum at 700. Overall, inbred lines CML202, 144-7-b, 139-5-j, 136-a, 30H83-7-1-1-1-2-1, ILoo’E-1-9-1-1-1-1-1 and 142-1-e, were identified as promising sources of resistance against E. turcicum. The selected elite inbred lines would be recommended for use in general varietal development, disease management and to enhance maize productivity, in the mid-altitude sub-humid tropics.

Keywords

Exserohilum turcicum inbred line leaf blight maize resistance breeding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) is sincerely thanked for financial support of the study. The Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) is acknowledged for providing the first author’s leave of absence and for hosting the field research. The all-round support provided by the national maize research program of Ethiopia is highly appreciated. The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) is sincerely thanked for providing some of the inbred lines.

References

  1. Adipala, E. 1994. Reaction of 13 maize genotypes to E. turcicum in different agro-ecological zones of Uganda.Google Scholar
  2. East Afr. Agric. J. 59:213–218.Google Scholar
  3. Agrios, G.N. 2005. Plant Pathology 5th Ed. Academic Press. Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  4. Avila, C.M., Satovic, Z., Sillero, J.C., Rubiales, D., Moreno, M.T., Pauls, K.P., Torres A.M. 2004. Isolate and organ-specific QTLs for ascochyta blight resistance in faba bean (Vicia faba L). Theor. Appl. Genet. 108:1071–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardi Ogliari, J., Guimarães, M.A., Geraldi, I.O., Camargo, L.E.A. 2005. New resistance genes in the Zea mays-Exserohilum turcicum pathosystem. Genet. Mol. Biol. 28:435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen, K.L., Pedersen, W.L. 1988. Effects of northern leaf blight components on corn inbreds. Plant Disease 72:952–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, C.L., Madden, L.V. 1991. Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology. John Wiley and Sons. New York, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Cardwell, K.F., Schulthess, F., Ndehma, R., Ngoko, Z. 1997. A systems approach to assess crop health and maize yield loss due to pests and diseases. Cameroon Agri. Ecosystems Env. 65:33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ceballos, H., Deutsch, J.A., Gutiérrez, H. 1991. Recurrent selection for resistance to Exserohilum turcicum in eight subtropical maize populations. Crop Sci. 31:964–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CIMMYT 2002. Annual Report. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico. CIMMYT 2004. A guide for field identification. 4th Ed. Mexico, D.F., Mexico.Google Scholar
  11. Dong, J., Fan, Y., Gui, X., An, X., Ma, J., Dong, Z. 2008. Geographic distribution and genetic analysis of physiological races of Setosphaeria turcica in northern China. Am. J. Agr. Biol. Science 3:389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freymark, P.J., Lee, M., Martinson, C.A., Woodman, W.L. 1994. Molecular marker facilitated investigation of host plant response to E. turcicum in maize (Zea mays L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hawbaker, M.S., Goodman, M.M. 2006. Resistance of temperately adapted tropical inbred lines and test-crosses to three important maize pathogens. Maydica 51:135–139.Google Scholar
  14. Levy, Y. 1991. Variation in fitness among field isolates of Exserohilum turcicum in Israel. Plant Dis. 75:163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lipps, P.E., Pratt, R.C., Hakiza, J.J. 1997. Interaction of Ht and partial resistance to Exserohilum turcicum in maize. Plant Dis. 81:277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Muiru, W.M., Mutitu, W.E., Kemenju, J.W. 2007. Reaction of some Kenyan maize genotypes to Turcicum leaf blight under greenhouse and field conditions. Asian J. Plant Sci. 6:1190–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Muriithi, L.M., Mutinda, C.J.M. 2001. Genetic variability of maize genotypes for resistance to exerohilium turcicum in Kenya. Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference. 11th – 15th February 2001. Online available at: apps.cimmyt.orgGoogle Scholar
  18. Ojulong, H.F., Adipala, E., Rubaihayo, P.R. 1996. Diallel analysis for reaction to Exserohilum turcicum of maize cultivars and crosses. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 4:19–27.Google Scholar
  19. Payne, R.W., Murray, D.A., Harding, S.A., Baird, D.B., Soutar, D.M. 2008. GenStat for Windows (11th Edition). VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Pratt, R.C., Gordon, K., Lipps, P., Asea, G., Bigirwa, G., Pixley, K. 2003. Use of IPM in the control of multiple diseases of maize. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 11:189–198.Google Scholar
  21. Pratt, R.C., Lipps, P.E., Sango, F., Hakiza, J.J., Adipala, E. 1997. Inheritance of race non-specific resistance to Exserohilum turcicum in maize synthetic population OhS10. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 1:55–63.Google Scholar
  22. Singh, R., Mam, V.P., Koranga, K.S., Bisht, G.S., Khandelwal, R.S., Bhandar, P., Pan, S.K. 2004. Identification of additional sources of resistance to Exserohilum turcicum in maize. Sabrao J. Breeding Genet. 36:45–47.Google Scholar
  23. Talukder, Z.I., Tharreau, D., Price, A.H. 2004. Quantitative trait loci analysis suggests that partial resistance to rice blast is mostly determined by race-specific interactions. New Phytol. 162:197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Welz, H.G., Geiger, H.H. 2000. Genes for resistance to northern corn leaf blight in diverse maize populations. Plant Breeding 119:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wende, A., Hussein, S., Derera, J., Mosisa, W., Laing, M.D. 2013. Preferences and constraints of maize farmers in the development and adoption of improved varieties in the mid-altitude, sub-humid agro-ecology of western Ethiopia. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 8:1245–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wisser, R.J., Balint-Kurt, P.J., Nelson, R.J. 2008. The genetic architecture of disease resistance in maize: A synthesis of published studies. Phytopathol. 96:120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2016

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Abera
    • 1
  • H. Shimelis
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Derera
    • 1
  • M. Worku
    • 2
  • M. Laing
    • 1
  1. 1.African Centre for Crop ImprovementUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalScottsville, PietermaritzburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.CIMMYT/Kenya, ICRAF HouseNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations