Sexuality Research & Social Policy

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 37–50 | Cite as

Left to their own devices: Disciplining youth discourse on sexuality education electronic bulletin boards



In contrast to the strict regulation of school-based sexuality education, Internet-based sexuality education has virtually free rein over its content and pedagogical methods. One common feature of sexuality education websites is an electronic bulletin board system (BBS) that facilitates peer education and exchange. A grounded-theory study and analysis of the BBSs sponsored by the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) and by the Coalition for Positive Sexuality (CPS) were performed, and many thematic similarities and points of divergence between the respective BBSs emerged. Although both organizations advocate for comprehensive sexuality education, the BBS on PPFA’s Teenwire website is moderated by adults, whereas CPS does not moderate discussion on its BBS. Analysis indicated that this subtle exertion of age-based authority played a role in shaping and censoring BBS discourse. These data are used to highlight the capacities of youth, critique age-based hegemonic practices, and support youth-positive sexuality education policies and practices.

Key words

peer and education Internet adolescence youth and development 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aggleton, P., & Campbell, C. (2000). Working with young people—towards an agenda for sexual health. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 15, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barak, A., & Fischer, W.A. (2001). Toward an Internet-driven, theoretically-based, innovative approach to sex education. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 324–332.Google Scholar
  3. Bargh, J.A., McKenna, K.Y.A., & Fitzsimmons, G. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bay-Cheng, L.Y. (2001). Values and norms in web-based sexuality education. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 241–251.Google Scholar
  5. Bay-Cheng, L.Y. (2003). The trouble of teen sex: The construction of adolescent sexuality through school-based sexuality education. Sex Education, 3, 61–74.Google Scholar
  6. Borzekowski, D.L.G., & Rickert, V.I. (2001). Adolescents, the Internet, and health: Issues of access and content. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brydon-Miller, M. (2001). Education, research, and action: Theory and methods of participatory action research. In D. L. Tolman & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp. 76–89). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 109–126). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  9. Chenitz, C.W., & Swanson, J. (1990). From practice to grounded theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Coalition for Positive Sexuality. (1997). Just say yes. Washington, DC: Coalition for Positive SexualityGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, A., Boies, S., Maheu, M., & Greenfield, D. (1999). Sexuality and the Internet: The next sexual revolution. In F. Muscarella and L. Szuchman (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on human sexuality (pp. 519–545). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Elia, J.P. (2000). Democratic sexuality education: A departure from sexual ideologies and traditional schooling. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 25, 122–129.Google Scholar
  13. Finn, J.L. (2001). Text and turbulence: Representing adolescence as pathology in the human services. Childhood, 8, 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flowers-Coulson, P.A., Kushner, M.A., & Bankowski, S. (2000). The information is out there, but is anyone getting it? Adolescent misconceptions about sexuality education and reproductive health and the use of the Internet to get answers. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 25, 178–188.Google Scholar
  15. Forrest, S., Strange, V., & Oakley, A. (2002). A comparison of students’ evaluations of a peer-delivered sex education programme and teacher-led provision. Sex Education, 2, 195–214.Google Scholar
  16. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  17. Greenfield, P.M., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2003). Online discourse in a teen chatroom: New codes and new modes of coherence in a visual medium. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 713–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, G.S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion, and education (Vols. 1-2). New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
  19. Holland, S. (2001). Representing children in child protection assessments. Childhood, 8, 322–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lerner, R.M., Dowling, E.M., & Anderson, P.M. (2003). Positive youth development: Thriving as the basis of personhood and civil society. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lesko, N. (1996). Denaturalizing adolescence: The politics of contemporary representations. Youth and Society, 28, 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lesko, N. (2001). Act your age! A cultural construction of adolescence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Males, M. (1996). The scapegoat generation: American’s war on adolescents. Monroe, ME: Common Courage.Google Scholar
  24. Milburn, K. (1995). A critical review of peer education with young people with special reference to sexual health. Health Education Research, 10, 407–420.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Millner, V.S., & Kiser, J.D. (2002). Sexual information and Internet resources. Family Journal, 10, 234–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moran, J.P. (2000). Teaching sex: The shaping of adolescence in the 20th century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Robinson, K.M. (2001). Unsolicited narratives from the Internet: A rich source of qualitative data. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 706–714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Roffman, D.M., Shannon, D., & Dwyer, C. (1997). Adolescents, sexual health, and the Internet: Possibilities, prospects, and challenges for educators. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 49–55.Google Scholar
  29. Sex-ed. group decries CDC & USDA removal of links to group’s web site. (2002, March 11). Retrieved June 13, 2004, from Online Policy Group website: Scholar
  30. Singer R. Kelly pleads not guilty to child porn. (2004, February 3). Retrieved January 10, 2005, from Cable News Network website: http://archives. Scholar
  31. Smith, M.U., & DiClemente, R.J. (2000). STAND: Apeer educator training curriculum for sexual risk reduction in the rural South. Preventive Medicine, 30, 441–449.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Stern, S.E., & Handel, A.D. (2001). Sexuality and mass media: The historical context of psychology’s reaction to sexuality on the Internet. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Sutton, M.J., Brown, J.D., Wilson, K.M., & Klein, J.D. (2002). Shaking the tree of knowledge for forbidden fruit: Where adolescents learn about sexuality and contraception. In J. D. Brown, J. R. Steele, & K. Walsh-Childers (Eds.), Sexual teens, sexual media: Investigating media’s influence on adolescent sexuality (pp. 25–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  35. Suzuki, L.K., & Calzo, J.P. (2004, March). Giving and receiving peer advice online: An examination of online teen health bulletin boards. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the Society for Research on Adolescence.Google Scholar
  36. Tiggemann, M., & Kenyon, S.J. (1998). The hairlessness norm: The removal of body hair in women. Sex Roles, 39, 873–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Turner, G., & Shepherd, J. (1999). A method in search of a theory: Peer education and health promotion. Health Education Research, 14, 235–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ungar, M.T. (2000). The myth of peer pressure. Adolescence, 35, 167–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Whatley, M.H., & Henken, E.R. (2000). Did you hear about the girl who ... ? Contemporary legends, folklore, and human sexuality. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Social WorkState University of New York at BinghamtonBinghamton

Personalised recommendations