Acta Geophysica

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 336–361 | Cite as

Site-specific Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map of Himachal Pradesh, India. Part I. Site-specific Ground Motion Relations

  • Prabhu Muthuganeisan
  • S. T. G. Raghukanth
Open Access
Acta Geophysica

Abstract

This article presents four regional site-specific ground motion relations developed for the state of Himachal Pradesh in northwest Himalaya, situated in a seismically active region. These relations are developed from synthetic free surface ground motion databases obtained from a calibrated stochastic seismological model considering the characteristic properties of this specific region. The adopted methodology incorporates the site effects characterised through active MASW tests conducted in 22 important cities. The estimated ground motion levels from the developed relations are found to be in reasonable agreement with the recorded data.

Key words

PSHA GMPE seismic hazard site coefficients Himalaya 

References

  1. Abrahamson, N.A., W.J. Silva, and R. Kamai (2014), Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions, Earthq. Spectra 30, 3, 1025–1055, DOI: 10.1193/070913EQS198M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, G.M., and D.M. Boore (1995), Ground-motion relations for eastern North America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, 1, 17–30.Google Scholar
  3. Boore, D.M. (1983), Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73, 6A, 1865–1894.Google Scholar
  4. Boore, D.M. (2009), Comparing stochastic point-source and finite-source ground-motion simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99, 6, 3202–3216, DOI: 10.1785/0120090056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boore, D.M., and G.M. Atkinson (1987), Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard-rock sites in eastern North America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 2, 440–467.Google Scholar
  6. Boore, D.M., and J. Boatwright (1984), Average body-wave radiation coefficients, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, 5, 1615–1621.Google Scholar
  7. Boore, D.M., and W.B. Joyner (1997), Site amplifications for generic rock sites, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87, 2, 327–341.Google Scholar
  8. Boore, D.M., J.P. Stewart, E. Seyhan, and G.M. Atkinson (2014), NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes, Earthq. Spectra 30, 3, 1057–1085, DOI: 10.1193/ 070113EQS184M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brune, J.N. (1970), Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 26, 4997–5009, DOI: 10.1029/ JB075i026p04997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, K.W., and Y. Bozorgnia (2014), NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra, Earthq. Spectra 30, 3, 1087–1115, DOI: 10.1193/062913EQS175M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiou, B.S.-J., and R.R. Youngs (2014), Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra, Earthq. Spectra 30, 3, 1117–1153, DOI: 10.1193/ 072813EQS219M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hwang, H., and J.-R. Huo (1997), Attenuation relations of ground motion for rock and soil sites in eastern United States, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 16, 6, 363–372, DOI: 10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00016-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IBC (2009), 2009 International Building Code, International Code Council, Inc., Country Club Hills, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Idriss, I.M., and J.I. Sun (1992), SHAKE91: A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits. User’s guide, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Iman, R.L., and W.J. Conover (1980), Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment, Commun. Stat. Theor. Meth. 9, 17, 1749–1842, DOI: 10.1080/03610928008827996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IS:1893 (2002), Indian standard, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part 1, 5th rev., Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  17. Joyner, W.B., and D.M. Boore (1981), Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71, 6, 2011–2038.Google Scholar
  18. Kayal, J.R. (2008), Microearthquake Seismology and Seismotectonics of South Asia, Springer, Dordrecht, Capital Publ. Co., New Delhi.Google Scholar
  19. Mittal, H., A. Kumar, and R. Ramhmachhuani (2012), Indian national strong motion instrumentation network and site characterization of its stations, Int. J. Geo-sci. 3, 6A, 1151–1167, DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2012.326117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohanty, W.K., R. Prakash, G. Suresh, A.K. Shukla, M.Y. Walling, and J.P. Srivastava (2009), Estimation of coda wave attenuation for the national capital region, Delhi, India using local earthquakes, Pure Appl. Geophys. 166, 3, 429–449, DOI: 10.1007/s00024-009-0448-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Motazedian, D., and G.M. Atkinson (2005), Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95, 3, 995–1010, DOI: 10.1785/0120030207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muthuganeisan, P., and S.T.G. Raghukanth (2016), Site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard map of Himachal Pradesh, India. Part II. Hazard estimation, Acta Geophys., DOI: 10.1515/acgeo-2016-0011.Google Scholar
  23. NDMA (2011), Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India, Technical Report, Working Committee of Experts (WCE), National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  24. Park, C.B., R.D. Miller, and J. Xia (1999), Multichannel analysis of surface waves, Geophysics 64, 3, 800–808, DOI: 10.1190/1.1444590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saragoni, G.R., and G.C. Hart (1973), Simulation of artificial earthquakes, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2, 3, 249–267, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290020305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singh, S.K., R.S. Dattatrayam, N.M. Shapiro, P. Mandal, J.F. Pacheco, and R.K. Midha (1999), Crustal and upper mantle structure of Peninsular India and source parameters of the 21 May 1997, Jabalpur earthquake (Mw = 5.8): Results from a new regional broadband network, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 89, 6, 1631–1641.Google Scholar
  27. Singh, S.K., D. García, J.F. Pacheco, R. Valenzuela, B.K. Bansal, and R.S. Dattatra-yam (2004), Q of the Indian shield, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 4, 1564–1570, DOI: 10.1785/012003214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Toro, G.R., N.A. Abrahamson, and J.F. Schneider (1997), Models of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68, 1, 41–57, DOI: 10.1785/ gssrl.68.1.41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vucetic, M., and R. Dobry (1991), Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response, J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE 117, 1, 89–107, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410 (1991)117:1(89).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Muthuganeisan and Raghukanth 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prabhu Muthuganeisan
    • 1
  • S. T. G. Raghukanth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations