Advertisement

Acta Geophysica

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 843–862 | Cite as

Preliminary Results of Anthropogenic Seismicity Monitoring in the Region of Song Tranh 2 Reservoir, Central Vietnam

  • Jan Wiszniowski
  • Nguyen Van Giang
  • Beata Plesiewicz
  • Grzegorz Lizurek
  • Dinh Quoc Van
  • Le Quang Khoi
  • Stanisław Lasocki
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Song Tranh 2 hydropower plant and the reservoir containing backed up water are located in the Quang Nam province (Central Vietnam). The region experiences unusual seismic activity related to the reservoir impoundment, with earthquakes of magnitude up to 4.7. In result of cooperation between the Institute of Geophysics, Vietnam Academy of Sciences and Technology and the Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences a seismic network has been built to facilitate seismic monitoring of the Song Tranh 2 area. The network, operating since August 2013, consists of 10 seismic stations. Here we show that the network is sufficient for advanced data processing. The first results of monitoring of the earthquake activity in Song Tranh 2 area in the period between 2012 and 2014, especially the completeness of catalogs, study and comparisons between water level and the seismic activity suggest direct connection between reservoir exploitation and anthropogenic seismicity.

Key words

reservoir induced seismicity seismic network source parameters focal mechanism completeness of catalogs 

Reference

  1. Awad, H., and G. Kwiatek (2005), Focal mechanism of earthquakes from June 1987 swarm in Aswan, Egypt, calculated by the moment tensor inversion, Acta Geophys. Pol. 53, 3, 275–291.Google Scholar
  2. Bratt, S.R., and T.C. Bache (1988), Locating events with a sparse network of regional arrays, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78, 2, 780–798.Google Scholar
  3. Bratt, S.R., and W. Nagy (1991), The LocSAT program, Science Applications International Corporation, San Diego.Google Scholar
  4. Cao, A.M., and S.S. Gao (2002), Temporal variation of seismic b-values beneath northeastern Japan island arc, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 9, 48–1–48–3, DOI: 10.1029/2001GL013775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carder, D.S. (1945), Seismic investigations in the Boulder Dam area, 1940-1944, and the influence of reservoir loading on local earthquake activity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 35, 4, 175–192.Google Scholar
  6. Choudhury, S., P.K. Gautam, and A. Paul (2013), aySeismicity and reservoir induced crustal motion study around the Tehri Dam, India, Acta Geophys. 61, 4, 923–934, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-013-0125-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitch, T.J., D.W. McCowan, and M.W. Shields (1980), Estimation of the seismic moment tensor from teleseismic body wave data with applications to intraplate and mantle earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 85, B7, 3817–3828, DOI: 10.1029/JB085iB07p03817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fyhn, M.B.W., L.O. Boldreel, and L.H. Nielsen (2009), Geological development of the Central and South Vietnamese margin: Implications for the establishment of the South China Sea, Indochinese escape tectonics and Cenozoic volcanism, Tectonophysics 478, 3–4, 184–214, DOI: 10.1016/ j.tecto.2009.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giang, N.V., G. Marquis, and L.H. Minh (2010), EM and GPR investigations of contaminant spread around the Hoc Mon waste site, Vietnam, Acta Geophys. 58, 6, 1040–1055, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-010-0023-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta, H.K. (1985), The present status of reservoir induced seismicity investigations with special emphasis on Koyna earthquakes, Tectonophysics 118, 3–4, 257–279, DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(85)90125-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta, H.K. (1992), Reservoir–Induced Earthquakes, Developments in Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 64, Elsevier Science Publ., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Gupta, H.K. (2011), Artificial water reservoir triggered earthquakes. In: H.K. Gupta (ed.) Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics, Springer, Dordrecht, 15–24, DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8702-7_15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gutenberg, B., and C.F. Richter (1944), Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 34, 4, 184–188.Google Scholar
  14. Hardebeck, J.L., and P.M. Shearer (2002), A new method for determining firstmotion focal mechanisms, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 6, 2264–2276, DOI: 10.1785/0120010200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haskell, N.A. (1953), The dispersion of surface waves on multilayered media, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 43, 1, 17–34.Google Scholar
  16. Kwiatek, G. (2013), FOCI 3.0 software, http://induced.pl/foci (in Polish).Google Scholar
  17. Leptokaropoulos, K.M., V.G. Karakostas, E.E. Papadimitriou, A.K. Adamaki, O. Tan, and S. İnan (2013), A homogeneous earthquake catalog for Western Turkey and magnitude of completeness determination, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103, 5, 2739–2751, DOI: 10.1785/0120120174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lizurek, G., B. Plesiewicz, P. Wiejacz, J. Wiszniowski, and J. Trojanowski (2013), Seismic event near Jarocin (Poland), Acta Geophys. 61, 1, 26–36, DOI:10.2478/s11600-012-0052-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mignan, A., and J. Woessner (2012), Estimating the magnitude of completeness for earthquake catalogs, Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis, http://www.corssa.org.
  20. Nam, T.N. (1995), The geology of Vietnam: A brief summary and problems, Geosci. Rep. Shizuoka Univ. 22, 1–10, DOI: 10.14945/00000334.Google Scholar
  21. Peterson, J. (1982), GDSN enhancement studies final report, ARPA Order No. 4295, USGS Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory, Albuquerque, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Phach, P.V., and V.V Chinh (1995), Report on structure/tectonic for Cenozoic and relationship with seismicity on territory of Vietnam, Archives of the Institute of Geophysics, VAST, Hanoi, Vietnam (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
  23. Shi, Y., and B.A. Bolt (1982), The standard error of the magnitude-frequency b-value, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 5, 1677–1687.Google Scholar
  24. Simpson, D.W. (1976), Seismicity changes associated with reservoir loading, Eng. Geol. 10, 2–4, 123–150, DOI: 10.1016/0013-7952(76)90016-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Simpson, D.W. (1986), Triggered earthquakes, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 14, 21–42, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ea.14.050186.000321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simpson, D.W., W.S. Leith, and C.H. Scholz (1988), Two types of reservoirinduced seismicity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78, 6, 2025–2040.Google Scholar
  27. Son, L.T. (1995), The approximation of seismic velocity model for Vietnam territory. In: Proc. Fourth National Conference on Physics, 5–8 October 1993, Hanoi, Vietnam, 651–655 (in Vietnamese, abstract in English).Google Scholar
  28. Thuy, N.N., P.V. Phach, V.V. Chinh, L.H. Minh, P.D. Nguyen, P.Q. Hung, and N.A. Duong (2003), Report on estimation of the seismic design for the Song Tranh 2 hydropower construction, Archives of the Institute of Geophysics, VAST, Hanoi, Vietnam (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
  29. Trojanowski, J., B. Plesiewicz, and J. Wiszniowski (2015), Seismic monitoring of Poland–description and results of temporary seismic project with mobile seismic network, Acta Geophys. 63, 1, 17–44, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-014-0255-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wiejacz, P. (1992), Calculation of seismic moment tensor for mine tremors from the Legnica–Głogów Copper Basin, Acta Geophys. Pol. 40, 2, 103–122.Google Scholar
  31. Wiemer, S., and M. Wyss (2000), Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 4, 859–869, DOI: 10.1785/0119990114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Woessner, J., and S. Wiemer (2005), Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: Estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95, 2, 684–698, DOI: 10.1785/0120040007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wyss, M., A. Hasegawa, S. Wiemer, and N. Umino (1999), Quantitative mapping of precursory seismic quiescence before the 1989, M7.1 off-Sanriku earthquake, Japan, Ann. Geofis. 42, 5, 851–869.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wiszniowski et al. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Wiszniowski
    • 1
  • Nguyen Van Giang
    • 2
  • Beata Plesiewicz
    • 1
  • Grzegorz Lizurek
    • 1
  • Dinh Quoc Van
    • 1
  • Le Quang Khoi
    • 2
  • Stanisław Lasocki
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of GeophysicsPolish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Institute of GeophysicsVietnam Academy of Science and TechnologyHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations