Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 70, Issue 12, pp 1631–1636 | Cite as

Short-horned grasshopper subfamilies feed at different rates on big bluestem and switchgrass cultivars

  • Muhammad Irfan UllahEmail author
  • Fatima Mustafa
  • William W. Hoback
  • Mathew L. Brust
  • Kerri M. Farnsworth-Hoback
  • John E. Foster
Section Zoology
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Grasshopper species belonging to subfamilies Melanoplinae, Gomphocerinae and Oedipodinae were tested for their feeding rate on three types of grass. All grasshopper species were offered Shawnee and Kanlow cultivars of switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L. and big bluestem, Andropogon gerardii Vitman. The grasshoppers, Melanoplus femurrubrum and Melanoplus differentialis were also tested for their feeding on turgid or wilted leaves of the Shawnee cultivar of switchgrass. We found that M. differentialis consumed more switchgrass compared to big bluestem while M. femurrubrum and Arphia xanthoptera consumed the most Shawnee switchgrass. The M. differentialis consumed more turgid grass compared to wilted switchgrass. The feeding performances show differences among grasshopper species even in the same subfamily and suggest that Melanoplinae grasshoppers may become destructive pests of switchgrass planted for biofuel production.

Key words

grasshopper switchgrass biofuel leaf consumption insect herbivore 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andow D.A. 1991. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36: 561–586. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.003021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belsky A.J. 1986. Does herbivory benefit plants? A review of the evidence. Am. Nat. 127 (6): 870–892. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1086/284531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernays E.A. 2001. Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 703–727. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1146/an-nurev.ento.46.1.703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernays E.A., Chapman R., Leather E., McCaffery A. & Modder W. 1977. The relationship of Zonocerus variegatus (L.) (Acridoidea: Pyrgomorphidae) with cassava (Manihot esculenta). Bull. Entomol. Res. 67 (3): 391–404. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300011202/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brust M.L., Hoback W.W. & Wright R.J. 2008. A synopsis of Nebraska grasshopper distribution. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 81 (3): 208–255. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2317/JKES-801.22.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caswell H. & Reed F.C. 1976. Plant herbivore interactions: the indigestibility of C7 bundle sheath cells by grasshoppers. Oecologia 26 (2): 151–156. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00582893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caswell H., Reed F., Stephenson S.N. & Werner P.A. 1973. Photosynthetic pathways and selective herbivory: A hypothesis. Amer. Nat. 107 (956): 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chu I-Wu. & Knutson H. 1970. Preferences of eight grasshopper species among eleven of cultivated grasses. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 43 (1): 20–31.Google Scholar
  9. Dyer M.I., Detling J.K., Coleman D.C. & Hilbert D.W. 1982. The role of herbivores in grasslands, pp. 255–295. In: Estes J.R., R.J. Tyrl & J.N. Brunken (eds), Grasses and Grasslands: Systematic and Ecology, University of Oklahoma, Press Norman, 312 pp. ISBN: 0806117761Google Scholar
  10. Gangwere S.K. 1961. A monograph on food selection in Orthoptera. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 87: 67–230.Google Scholar
  11. Gottwald R. & Adam L. 1998. Ergebnisse zu entomologischen Erhebungen und zur Unkrautbekämpfung bei Miscanthus und anderen C4-Pflanzen [Results of entomological surveys and on the weed control in Miscanthus and other C4 plants.] Archiv für Phytopathologie und Pflanzenschutz. Arch. Phytopathol. Pflanzenschutz [Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot.] 31 (4): 377–386. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/03235409809383248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hefley H.M. 1937. Ecological studies of the South Canadian River floodplain in Cleveland County, Oklahoma. Ecol. Monogr. 7: 345–402. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/1943055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heidorn T. & Joern A. 1984. Differential herbivory on C3 versus C4 grasses by the grasshopper Ageneotettix deorum, (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia 65 (1): 19–25. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hewitt G.B. & Onsager J.A, 1983. Control of grasshoppers on rangeland in the United States — A perspective. J. Range Manage. 36 (2): 202–207. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/3898163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holguin C. 2010 Insect diversity and pest status on switchgrass grown for biofuel in South Carolina. M.S Thesis, Clemson University South Carolina, United States, Paper 960, 78 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Joern A. 1979. Resource utilization by grasshopper assemblages. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 105 (3): 253–300.Google Scholar
  17. Joern A. 1983. Host plant utilization by grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) from a sandhills prairie. J. Range Manage. 36 (6): 793–797. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/3898212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaufmann T. 1968. A laboratory study of feeding habits of Melanoplus differentialis in Maryland (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61 (1): 173–180. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/61.1.173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krueger C.R. & Curtis D.C. 1979. Evaluation of big bluestem, indiangrass, side oats grama and switchgrass pastures with yearling steers. Agron. J. 71: 480–482. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1979.00021962007100030024xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis A.C. 1979. Feeding preference for diseased and wilted sunflower in the grasshopper Melanoplus differentialis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 26 (2): 202–207. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1979.tb02918.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis A.C. 1984. Plant quality and grasshopper feeding: Effects of sunflower condition on preference and performance in Melanoplus differentialis. Ecology 65 (3): 836–843. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/1938057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McLaughlin S.B. & Walsh M.E. 1998. Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy. Biomass. Bioenerg. 14 (4): 317–324. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10066-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLaughlin S., Bouton J, Bransby D., Conger B., Ocumpaugh W., Parrish D., Taliaferro C., Vogel K. & Wullschleger S. 1999. Developing Switchgrass as a Bioenergy Crop, pp. 282–299. In: Janick J. (ed.), Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, 528 pp. ISBN: 0-9615027-0-3Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell J.E. & Pfadt R.E. 1974. A role of grasshoppers in a shortgrass prairie ecosystem. Environ. Entomol. 3: 358–360. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/3.2.358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitchell R.B., Moore K.J., Moser L.E., Fritz J.O. & Redfearn D.D. 1997. Predicting developmental morphology in switch-grass and big bluestem. Agron. J. 89 (5): 827–832. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.931118xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morris R.J., Fox R.H., Jung G.A. 1982. Growth, P uptake, and quality of warm and cool-season grasses on a low available P soil. Agron. J. 74 (1): 125–129. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400010032xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moser L.E. Vogel K.P. 1995. Switchgrass, big bluestem and indiangrass, pp. 409–420. In Barnes R.F. et al (ed.), Forages: An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture, Ed. 5th, Iowa State University Press, Ames, 516 pp. ISBN: 0-8138-0681-XGoogle Scholar
  28. Mulkern G.B. 1967. Food selection by grasshoppers. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 12: 59–78. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.12.010167.000423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newell L.C. 1968. Chemical composition of two warm-season prairie grasses in three environments. Crop Sci. 8 (3): 325–329. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropscil968.0011183X000800030019xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newell L.C. & Moline W.J. 1978. Forage quality evaluations of twelve grasses in relation to season for grazing, 43 pp. Res. Bull. 283 Lincoln, NE: Univ Nebraska, Agric. Exp. Stat.Google Scholar
  31. Olfert O. & Weiss R. 2002. Impact of grasshopper feeding on selected cultivars of cruciferous oilseed crops. J. Orthopt. Res. 11 (1): 83–86. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1665/1082-6467(2002)011[0083:IOGFOS]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parrish D.J. & Fike F.H. 2005. The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 24 (5-6): 423–459. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680500316433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pfadt R.E. 1994. Field Guide to Common Western Grasshoppers. Ed. 2nd Wyoming Agric. Exp. Stat. Bull. 912, 288 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Pfadt R.E. 2002. A Field Guide to Common Western Grasshoppers. Ed. 3rd Wyoming Agric. Exp. Stat. Bull. 912, 288 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Porter L.C. Jr. 1966. An analysis of variation between upland and lowland switchgrass, Panicum, virgatum, L., in central Oklahoma. Ecology 47: 980–992. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/1935646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodell C.F. 1977. A grasshopper model for a grassland ecosystem. Ecology 58: 227–245. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/1935600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vermeire L.T., Mitchell R.B., Fuhlendorf S.D. & Wester D.B. 2004. Selective control of rangeland grasshoppers with prescribed fire. J. Range Manage. 57 (1): 29–33. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/4003951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vogel K.P. 2004. Switchgrass, pp. 561–587. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr45.cl6. In: Moser L.E. et al. (eds), Warm-season (C4) Grasses, Agr. Monogr. 45 ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI, 1194 pp. ISBN-13: 978-0891181569, ISBN-10: 0891181563Google Scholar
  39. Waller S.S. & Lewis J.K. 1979. Occurrence of C3 and C4 photosynthetic pathways in North American grasses. J. Range Manage. 32 (1): 12–28. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/3897378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ward K.E. & Ward R.N. 2001. Diversity and abundance of carabid beetles in short-rotation plantings of sweet gum, maize and switchgrass in Alabama. Agroforest Syst. 53 (3): 261–267. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013307023951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whipple S.D., Brust M.L., Hoback W.W. & Farnsworth-Hoback K.M. 2009. The grasshoppers Arphia xanthoptera and Dichromorpha viridis prefer introduced smooth brome over other grasses. Great Plains Res. 19: 179–186.Google Scholar
  42. White W.H., Adamski D., Brown J.W., Reagan T.E., Villanueva-Jimenez J.A., Mendez-Lopez M. & Way M. 2005. Survey results for the sugarcane pest, Blastobasis graminea (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), in Texas and Louisiana in 2002. Southwest Entomol. 30 (2): 85–91.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Slovak Academy of Sciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Irfan Ullah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fatima Mustafa
    • 1
  • William W. Hoback
    • 2
  • Mathew L. Brust
    • 3
  • Kerri M. Farnsworth-Hoback
    • 2
  • John E. Foster
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of Nebraska at KearneyUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyChadron State CollegeChadronUSA

Personalised recommendations