Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 70, Issue 12, pp 1637–1647 | Cite as

Nests of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) as habitat for invertebrates

  • Agata J. Krawczyk
  • Gabriela Augustiničová
  • Dariusz J. Gwiazdowicz
  • Szymon Konwerski
  • Halina Kucharczyk
  • Izabella Olejniczak
  • Tomasz Rutkowski
  • Piotr Skubała
  • Krzysztof Solarz
  • Zuzanna Zdrojewska
  • Piotr TryjanowskiEmail author
Section Zoology

Abstract

The nests of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) from an extensively used farmland in Western Poland were recognized as a place of occurrence of a large group of invertebrates. In total, from 42 nests 6,544 individuals of invertebrates were extracted. The number of invertebrates was positively correlated with mass of mouse nests. There were found arthropods belonging to the following groups: Arachnida: spiders, mites and pseudoscorpions; Entognatha: springtails; Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Psocoptera, Siphonaptera and Thysanoptera. The most numerous groups were mites (Acari, 5,800 individuals) and fleas (Siphonaptera, 415 individuals). Among mites Astigmatida, Mesostigmata and Oribatida were identified. One species, Tyrophagus curvipenis (Acari: Astigmatina), was found in Poland for the first time. The study clearly showed that nests of the harvest mouse are often inhabited by invertebrates, and looks like some of them are characteristic to this particular kind of habitat.

Key words

harvest mouse nesting biology mites springtails fleas thrips Poland 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez T., Frampton G.K. & Goulson D. 1997. Population dynamics of epigeic Collembola in arable fields: the importance of hedgerow proximity and crop type. Pedobiologia 41: 110–114.Google Scholar
  2. Bajerlein D., Bloszyk J., Gwiazdowicz D., Ptaszyk J. & Halliday B. 2006. Community structure and dispersal of mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) in nests of the white stork (Ciconio, ciconia). Biologia 61: 525–530. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2478/sll756-006-0086-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bence S.L., Stander K. & Griffiths M. 1999. Nest site selection by the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) on arable farmland. Asp. Appl. Biol. 54: 197–202.Google Scholar
  4. Bence S.L., Stander K. & Griffiths M. 2003. Habitat characteristics of harvest mouse nests on arable farmland. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 99: 179–186. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00137-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernini F. 1986. Current ideas on the phylogeny and the adaptative radiation of the Acarida. Boll. Zool. 53: 279–314 DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/11250008609355512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bias M.A. & Morrison M.L. 2006. Habitat selection of the salt marsh harvest mouse and sympatric of the rodent species. J. Wildl. Manage. 70: 732–742. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[732:HSOTSM]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloszyk J., Bajerlein D., Gwiazdowicz D.J., Halliday R.B. & Dylewska M. 2006. Uropodine mite communities (Acari: Mesostigmata) in birds’ nests in Poland. Belg. J. Zool. 136: 145–153.Google Scholar
  8. Bregetova N.G. 1956. Gamazovye kleshchi (Gamasoidea). Kratkii opredelitef. Opredeliteli po faune SSSR, izdavaemye Zoo-logicheskim institutom AN SSSR Vypusk 61 [Gamasid mites (Gamasoidea). The short keys] Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva, Leningrad, 247 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Bulanova-Zachvatkina E.M., Usova Z.B., Skliar B.E. & Jarosenko N.N. 1974. Pancirnye kleshchi (Oribatei) iz gnezd melkikh mlekopitayushchikh Doneckogo Priazoviya [Oribatid mites (Oribatei) from nests of small mammals in Doneck Region]. Vest. Zool. 1: 17–21.Google Scholar
  10. Burakowski B., Mroczkowski M. & Stefańska J. 1986. Chrząszcze — Coleoptera. Cucujoidea, częšč 2. Catalogus Faunae Poloniae 23 (13): 1–278.Google Scholar
  11. Butcher J.W., Snider R. & Snider J. 1971. Bioecology of edaphic Collembola and Acarina. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 16: 249–287. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.16.010171.001341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Büchner S., Stubbe M. & Striese D. 2003. Breeding and biological data for the common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) in Eastern Saxony (Germany). Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 49 (Suppl. 1): 19–26.Google Scholar
  13. Chmielewski W. 1977. Data concerning the occurrence of some species of allergenic mites (Acaroidea) in Poland. Wiad. Parazytol. 23: 109–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Christiansen K. 1964. Bionomics of Collembola. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 9: 147–178. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.09.010164.001051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christiansen K. 1970. Experimental studies on aggregational dispersion of Collembola. Pedobiologia 10: 180–189.Google Scholar
  16. Cianciolo J.M. & Norton R.A. 2006. The ecological distribution of reproductive mode in oribatid mites, as related to biological complexity. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 40: 1–25. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0493-006-9016-3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coleman D.C. 1985. Through a ped darkly: An ecological assessment of root-soil-microbial-faunal interactions, pp. 1–21. In: Fitter A.H., Atkinson D., Read D.J. & Usher M.B. (eds), Ecological Interactions in Soil: Plant, Microbes and Animals, Special Publication No. 4 of the British Ecological Society, Blackwell, Oxford, 460 pp. ISBN-13: 978-0632013869, ISBN-10: 0632013869Google Scholar
  18. Cyprich D., Krumpál M. & Lukáš J. 1992. Contribution to the knowledge of the flea fauna (Siphonaptera) of dormouse nests (Myoxidae) in Slovakia. Parasit. Hung. 25: 97–105.Google Scholar
  19. De Jonge G. & Dienske H. 1978. Habitat and interspecific displacement of small mammals in the Netherlands. Neth. J. Zool. 29: 177–214. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1163/002829679X00278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dickman C.R. 1986. Habitat utilization and diet of the harvest mouse, Micromys minutus, in an urban environment. Acta Theriol. 31: 249–256. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.86-24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans G.O. & Till W.M. 1966. Studies on the British Dermanyssidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Part II Classification. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Zool. 14: 109–370.Google Scholar
  22. Fain A. & Fauvel G. 1993. Tyrophagus curvipenis n. sp. from an orchid cultivation in a greenhouse in Portugal (Acari: Acaridae). Int. J. Acarol. 19: 95–100. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/01647959308683544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fan Q.H. & Zhang Z.Q. 2007. Tyrophagus (Acari: Astigmata: Acaridae). Fauna of New Zealand 56. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand, 291 pp. ISBN: 978-0-478-09386-5Google Scholar
  24. Fedor P.J., Doričová M., Dubovský M., Prokop P., Sierka W., Kiselák J. & Zvarík M. 2010. Cereal pests among nest parasites — the story of barley thrips, Limothrips denticornis Haliday (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Entomol. Fenn. 21: 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gwiazdowicz D.J., Błoszyk J., Bajerlein D., Halliday R.B. & Mizera T. 2006. Mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) inhabiting nests of the while-tailed sea eagle Haliaeetus albicilla (L.) in Poland. Entomol. Fenn. 17: 366–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gwiazdowicz D.J. & Filip K.P. 2009. Ophionyssus saurarum (Acari, Mesostigmata) infecting Lacerta agilis (Reptilia, Lacertidae). Wiad. Parazytol. 51: 61–62 PMID: 19579788Google Scholar
  27. Harris S. 1979. History, distribution, status and habitat requirements of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) in Britain. Mammal Rev. 9: 159–171. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1979.tb00253.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Joosse E.N. & Verhoef H.A. 1974. On the aggregation habits of surface dwelling Collembola. Pedobiologia 14: 245–249.Google Scholar
  29. Juskaitis R. & Remeisis R. 2007. Harvest mice Micromys minutus and common dormice Muscardinus avellanarius live sympatric in woodland habitat. Acta Theriol. 52: 349–354. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03194232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klimov P.B. & O’Connor B.M. 2009. Conservation of the name Tyrophagus putrescentiae, a medically and economically important mite species (Acari: Acaridae). Int. J. Acarol. 35: 95–114. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950902902587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klimov P.B. & O’Connor B.M. 2010. Acarus putrescentiae Schrank, 1781 (currently Tyrophagus putrescentiae; Acariformes, Acaridae): proposed conservation of usage by designation of a replacement neotype. Bull. Zool. Nomenclature 67: 24–27. Case 3501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krantz G.W. & Walter D.E. 2009. A Manual of Acarology. Third edition. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, USA, 807 pp. ISBN: 978-0-89672-620-8.Google Scholar
  33. Krivolutskij D.A. 1995. (ed.) Pancirnye kleshchi. Oribatid mites: Morfologiya, razvitie, fllogeniya, ekologiya, metody issledovaniya, kharakteristika modeljnogo vida Nothrus palustris CL. Koch, 1839 [Oribatid mites. Morphology, development, phylogeny, ecology, methods of study, model species Nothrus palustris (CL. Koch, 1839)]. AN Institut probl. ekologii i evolyucii im. A.N. Severcova, Ros. Kom. Po progr. JUNESKO “Chelovek i biosfera” Moskva, Nauka. [Moscow, Nauka Publishers], 224 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Kuroe M., Ohori S., Takatsuki S. & Miyashita T 2007. Nest-site selection by the harvest mouse Micromys minutus in seasonally changing environments. Acta Theriol. 52: 355–360. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03194233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuroe M., Yamaguchi N., Kadoya T. & Miyashita T. 2011. Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation. Oikos 120: 271–279. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18697.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luxton M. 1972. Studies on the oribatid mites of a Danish beech wood soil. I. Nutritional biology. Pedobiologia 12: 434–463.Google Scholar
  37. Mašán P. & Fend’a P. 2010. A review of the laelapid mites associated with terrestrial mammals in Slovakia, with a key to the European species (Acari: Mesostigmata: Dermanyssoidea). Institute of Zoology Slovak Academy of Sciences, NOI Press, Bratislava, 187 pp. ISBN: 978-80-970406-8-0Google Scholar
  38. Mašán P., Fenda P., Krištofík J. & Halliday B. 2014. A review of the ectoparasitic mites (Acari: Dermanyssoidea) associated with birds and their nests in Slovakia, with notes on identification of some species. Zootaxa 3893: 77–100. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3893.1.3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mašán P. & Stanko M. 2005. Mesostigmatic mites (Acari) and fleas (Siphonaptera) associated with nests of mound-building mouse, Mus spicilegus Petényi, 1882 (Mammalia, Rodentia). Acta Parasitol. 50: 228–234.Google Scholar
  40. Mebes K.H. & Filser J. 1997. A method for estimating the significance of surface dispersal for population fluctuations of Collembola in arable land. Pedobiologia 41: 115–122.Google Scholar
  41. Micherdziński W. 1980. Eine taxonomische Analyse der Familie Macronyssidae (Oudemans, 1936). I. Subfamilie Ornithonyssinae (Lange, 1958) (Acarina, Mesostigmata). (Praca wykonana w ramach problemu MR) (German Edition) PWN, Warsaw, 264 pp. ISBN-10: 8301015322, ISBN-13: 9788301015329Google Scholar
  42. Mound L.A. & Kibby G. 1998. Thysanoptera an Identification Guide. Wallingford, CAB International, 70 pp. ISBN-10: 0851992110, ISBN-13: 9780851992112Google Scholar
  43. Němec F. 1993. Flea community inhabiting nests of the common vole (Microtus arvalis [Pallas, 1779]) in west Bohemian farmland. Folia Musei Rerum Naturalium Bohemiae Occidentalis, Zoologica 38: 1–37.Google Scholar
  44. Norton R.A., Kethley J.B., Johnston D.E. & O’Connor B.M. 1993. Phylogenetic perspectives on genetic systems and reproductive modes of mites, pp. 8–99. In: Wrensch D. & Ebbert M. (eds), Evolution and Diversity of Sex Ratio in Insects and Mites, Chapman and Hall, USA, 634 pp. ISBN: 978-0-412-02221-0Google Scholar
  45. Olejniczak I. 2000. Effects of simplification of grass cultures and soil conditions on Collembola (Apterygota) communities in a lysimetric experiment. Pol. J. Ecol. 48: 209–224.Google Scholar
  46. Ozkan B., Yigit N. & Colak E. 2003. A Study on Micromys minutus (Pallas, 1771) (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkish Thrace. Turk J. Zool. 27: 55–60.Google Scholar
  47. Pelikán J., Fedor P., Krumpál L. & Cyprich D 2002. Strapky (Thysanoptera) v hniezdach vtakov a cicavcov na Slovensku. Thrips (Thysanoptera in nests of birds and mammals in Slovakia. Ekologia (Bratislava) 21: 275–282.Google Scholar
  48. Perrow M. & Jowitt A. 1995. What future for the harvest mouse? British Wildlife 6: 356–365.Google Scholar
  49. Reeves R.M. 1967. Oribatei from a bird nest. Acarologia 9: 284–289. ISSN: 0044-586XGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosický B. 1957. Fauna ČSR. Svazek 10, Blechy — Aphaniptera. Praha, Nakladatelství ČSAV, 439 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Sandner H. & Wasylik A. 1973. The mites of the sparrow nests and the danger of infestation of grannaries by them. Ekol. Pol. 21: 323–338.Google Scholar
  52. Schatz H. 1983. Catalogus Fauna Austriae, Teil IX i - Ordn.: Oribatei, Hornmilben. Vienna, Osterreichischen, Akademie der Wissenschaften, 118 pp. ISBN-13: 978-3-7001-0613-5, ISBN-10: 3-7001-0613-0Google Scholar
  53. Seastedt T.R. 1984. The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29: 25–46. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.000325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sergienko G.D. 1983. Oribatidy gnezd nekotorykh ptits i mleko-pitayushchikh [Oribatids from the nests of some birds and mammals]. Vestn. Zool. 2: 26–31.Google Scholar
  55. Solarz K. 2012. House Dust Mites and storage Mites (Acari: Oribatida: Astigmatina). Identification Keys. Institute of Systematic and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland, 120 pp. ISBN: 978-83-61358-48-0Google Scholar
  56. Solarz K., Szilman P. & Szilman E. 1999. Allergenic mites associated with bird nests in Poland (Astigmata: Pyroglyphidae, Acaridae, Glycyphagidae), pp. 651–656. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1343-656. In: Bruin J., van der Geest L.P.S. & Sabelis M.W. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of the Acari, Series Entomologica, Vol. 55, Springer, Amsterdam, 671 pp. ISBN: 978-90-481-5200-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Solarz K., Szilman P. & Szilman E. 2004. Occupational exposure to allergenic mites in a Polish Zoo. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 11: 27–33. PMID: 15236495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Solarz K., Szilman P., Szilman E., Krzak M. & Jagła A. 2004. Some allergenic species of astigmatid mites (Acari, Astigmata) from different synanthropic environments in southern Poland. Acta Zool. Cracov. 47: 125–145. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3409/173491504783995843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stanko M., Miklisová D., de Bellocq J.G. & Morand S. 2002. Mammal density and patterns of ectoparasite species richness and abundance. Oecologia 131: 289–295. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0889-5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Subias L.S. 2004. Listado sistemático, sinonímico y biogeográfico de los Ácaros Oribátidos (Acariformes, Oribatida) del mundo (1758–2002). Graellsia 60 (número extraordinario): 3–305. Actualizado en febrero de 2014: https://doi.org/escalera.bio.ucm.es/usuarios/bba/cont/docs/RO 1.pdf (accessed 30.05.2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Surmacki A., Goldyn B. & Tryjanowski P. 2005. Location and habitat characteristics of the breeding nests of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) in the reed-beds of an intensively used farmland. Mammalia 69: 5–9. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2005.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Trout R.C. 1978. A review of studies on populations of wild harvest mice (Micromys minutus (Pallas). Mammal Rev. 8: 143–158. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.l365-2907.1978.tb00224.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tryjanowski P., Baraniak E., Bajaczyk R., Gwiazdowicz D.J., Konwerski S., Olszanowski Z. & Szymkowiak P. 2001. Arthropods in nests of the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) in Poland. Belg. J. Zool. 131: 69–74.Google Scholar
  64. Urbani B. & Youlatos D. 2012 Positional behavior and substrate use of Micromys minutus (Rodentia: Muridae): Insights for understanding primate origins. J. Hum. Evol. 64: 130–136. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.10.006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wasylik A. 1959. Mite fauna (Tyroglyphoidea) in the nests of the common sparrow (Passer domesticus L.). Ekol. Pol. 5: 187–190.Google Scholar
  66. Wasylik A. 1964. Remarks on the dispersion of certain mites. Ekol. Pol. 10: 189–193.Google Scholar
  67. Wasylik A. 1971. Nest types and the abundance of mites. Ekol. Pol. 19: 689–699.Google Scholar
  68. Wasylik A. 1973. The mites (Acaroidea) inhabiting the nests of the tree sparrow (Passer montanus L.). Ekol. Pol. 21: 869–899.Google Scholar
  69. Zar J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Pearson Education, 4th edn. New Delhi, India, 929 pp. ISBN-10: 8177585827, ISBN-13: 9788177585827Google Scholar
  70. Zhang Z.Q. & Fan Q.H. 2005. Revision of Tyrophagus Oudemans (Acari: Acaridae) of New Zealand and Australia. Landcare Research Contract Report: LC0405/149, New Zealand Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand, 189 pp.Google Scholar
  71. Ždárková E. 1967. Stored food mites in Czechoslovakia. J. Stored. Prod. Res. 3: 155–175. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-474X(67)90024-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Slovak Academy of Sciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agata J. Krawczyk
    • 1
  • Gabriela Augustiničová
    • 2
  • Dariusz J. Gwiazdowicz
    • 3
  • Szymon Konwerski
    • 4
  • Halina Kucharczyk
    • 5
  • Izabella Olejniczak
    • 6
  • Tomasz Rutkowski
    • 7
  • Piotr Skubała
    • 8
  • Krzysztof Solarz
    • 9
  • Zuzanna Zdrojewska
    • 10
  • Piotr Tryjanowski
    • 10
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of BiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznanPoland
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Environmentalistics, Constantine the Philosopher University in NitraFaculty of Natural ScienceNitraSlovakia
  3. 3.Department of Forest PathologyUniversity of Life SciencesPoznanPoland
  4. 4.Natural History Collections, Faculty of BiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznanPoland
  5. 5.Department of ZoologyMaria Curie-Skłodowska UniversityLublinPoland
  6. 6.Institute of Ecology and BioethicsCardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in WarsawWarsawPoland
  7. 7.DąbrówkaPoland
  8. 8.Department of EcologyUniversity of SilesiaKatowicePoland
  9. 9.Department of ParasitologyMedical University of Silesia in Katowice, School of Pharmacy with the Division of Laboratory Medicine in SosnowiecSosnowiecPoland
  10. 10.Institute of ZoologyPoznan University of Life SciencesPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations