Advertisement

Acta Parasitologica

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 375–385 | Cite as

A new species of Chondracanthus (Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitic on deep-sea Dibranchus spongiosa (Lophiiformes: Ogcocephalidae) from the Eastern Central Pacific

  • Samuel GómezEmail author
  • Hugo Aguirre-Villaseñor
  • Francisco Neptali Morales-Serna
Article

Abstract

A total of 228 sampling stations were visited for benthic fauna during a series of oceanographic cruises in the Gulf of California, west coast of the Baja California Peninsula, and Eastern Central Pacific from year 1991 to 2014. Among others, three fish species of the genus Dibranchus were caught in 28 stations. Of these, D. spongiosa was the most common and abundant. Close inspection of this fish revealed the presence of a new species of parasitic copepod, Chondracanthus dibranchi sp. nov., found in the gill cavity of seven specimens of D. spongiosa. Chondracanthus dibranchi sp. nov. seems to be morphologically related to C. psetti and C. janebennettae. The female of C. janebennettae can be separated from these other two congeners by the general shape of the head and abdomen, by the number of teeth on the mandibular blade, and by the general body shape. Chondracanthus psetti and C. dibranchi sp. nov. share the relative lengths of legs 1 and 2, the relative size and shape of the genito-abdomen, and the conical attenuating lateral processes on the trunk of the female. The females of these two species can be separated by the shape and armature of the antennule, shape of the antenna, the claw of the maxilliped, the rami of leg 1 and 2 and posterior processes, the head region, and by the position of the lateral processes of the trunk. An amendment to Tang’s (2007) key to the species of Chondracanthus is proposed.

Keywords

Copepoda Cyclopoida Chondracanthus parasite taxonomy Mexico batfish deep sea 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boxshall G.A. 1998. Host specificity in copepod parasites of deepsea fishes. Journal of Marine Systems, 15, 215–223. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-7963(97)00058-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boxshall G.A. 2005. Copepoda (copepods). In: (Ed K. Rohde) Marine Parasitology. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp. 123–138Google Scholar
  3. Boxshall, G.A., Halsey S.H. 2004. An introduction to copepod diversity. The Ray Society, London, pp. 966Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury M.G. 1999. A review of the fish genus Dibranchus with descriptions of new species and a new genus, Solocisquama. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 51, 259–310Google Scholar
  5. Braicovich, P.E., Lanfranchi, A.L., Incorvaia, I.S., Timi J.T. 2013. Chondracanthid copepod parasites of dories (Zeiformes: Zeidae) with the description of a new species of Chondracanthus from waters off northern Argentina. Folia Parasitologica, 60, 359–364. DOI: 10.14411/fp.2013.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bush, A.O., Lafferty, K.D., Lotz, J.M., Shostak A.W. 1997. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology, 83, 575–583. DOI: 10.2307/3284227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castro-Aguirre, J.L., Moncayo-López M.E. 1976. Sobre la presencia de Dibranchus nudivomer (Garman) (Pis.: Ogcocephalidae) en la Costa Occidental de México, con notas y observaciones biológicas. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural, 37, 307–322. (In Spanish)Google Scholar
  8. Causey D. 1953. Parasitic Copepoda from Grand Isle, Louisiana. Occasional papers of the Marine Laboratory, Louisiana State University, 7, 1–18Google Scholar
  9. Causey D. 1960. Parasitic Copepoda from Mexican coastal fishes. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean, 10, 323–337Google Scholar
  10. Cruz-Acevedo, E., Salas-Singh C, Aguirre-Villaseñor H. 2017. Distribution of Dibranchus species (Pisces: Ogcocephalidae) from the Eastern Central Pacific and their relationship with environmental factors. Marine Biodiversity, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-017-0808-yGoogle Scholar
  11. Delaroche F. 1811. Sur des animaux vivant sur les branchies des poissons. Nouveau Bulletin des Sciences, Société Philomatique de Paris, 2, 270–272.Google Scholar
  12. Garman S. 1899. Reports on an exploration off the west coasts of Mexico, Central and South America, and off the Galapagos Islands, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer Albatross, during 1891, Lieut. Commander Z.L. Tanner, U.S.N., commanding. 26. The fishes. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, at Harvard College, Cambridge, Mass., 24, 1–431.DOI: DOI.org/10.5962/bhl.part.27494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert C.H. 1890. A preliminary report on the fishes collected by the steamer Albatross on the Pacific coast of North America during the year 1889, with descriptions of twelve new genera and ninety-two new species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 13, 49–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Girard C. F. 1854. Observations upon a collection of fishes made on the Pacific coast of the United States, by Lieut. W. P. Trowbridge, U.S.A., for the museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 7, 142–156Google Scholar
  15. Ho J.-S. 1971. Parasitic copepods of the family Chondracanthidae from fishes of Eastern North America. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 87, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 39Google Scholar
  16. Ho J.-S. 1972. Copepods of the family Chondracanthidae (Cyclopoida) parasitic on South African marine fishes. Parasitology, 65, 147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ho J.-S. 1977. Parasitic copepods of the family Chondracanthidae from fishes of the South–Eastern Pacific (Crustacea, Copepoda). Steenstrupia, 4, 157–165Google Scholar
  18. Ho J.-S. 1991. Redescription of Chondracanthus zei Delaroche (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) parasitic on Zeus faber L. in the Sea of Japan, with a preliminary review of the genus. Report of the Sado Marine Biological Station, 21, 49–79Google Scholar
  19. Kabata Z. 1979. Parasitic Copepoda of British fishes. The Ray Society, London, pp. 468Google Scholar
  20. Kabata Z. 1992. Copepods parasitic on fishes. In: (Eds D.M. Kermack, R.S.K. Barnes and J.H. Crothers) Synopses of the British Fauna (New Series). Universal Book Services/Dr. W. Backhuys, The Netherlands, pp. 1–264Google Scholar
  21. Kröyer H. 1863. Bidrag til Kundskab om Snyltekrebsene. Naturhistorisk tidsskrift, 3, 75–426Google Scholar
  22. Milne Edwards H. 1840. Ordre des copépodes. In: (Ed H. Milne Edwards) Histoire naturelle des crustacés, comprenant l’anatomie, la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux. Vol. 3. Imprimerie de Fain et Thunot, Paris, pp. 411–529Google Scholar
  23. Morales-Serna, F.N., Gómez, S., Pérez–Ponce de León G.P. 2012. Parasitic copepods reported from Mexico. Zootaxa, 3234, 43–68Google Scholar
  24. Morales-Serna, F.N., Rubio-Godoy, M., Gómez S. 2011. Seasonality of parasitic copepods on bullseye puffer, Sphoeroides annulatus (Pisces: Tetraodontidae), from the northwestern coast of Mexico. Journal of Parasitology, 97, 565–573. DOI: 10.1645/GE-2638.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oakley C.L. 1930. The Chondracanthidae (Crustacea: Copepoda); with a description of five new genera and one new species. Parasitology, 22, 182–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peters W. 1876. Über eine neue, mit Halieutaea verwandte Fischgattung, Dibranchus, aus dem Atlantischen Ocean. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Pereussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1875, 736–742Google Scholar
  27. Rameshkumar, G., Ravichandran, S., Venmathi Maran B.A. 2014. Occurrence of parasitic copepods in Carangid fishes from Parangipettai, Southeast coast of India. Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 38, 317–323. DOI: 10.1007/s12639-013-0251-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rathbun R. 1886. Description of parasitic Copepoda belonging to the genera Pandarus and Chondracanthus (with seven plates). Proceedings of the Unites States National Museum, 9, 310–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shiino S.M. 1955. Copepods parasitic on Japanese fishes. 9. Family Chondracanthidae, subfamily Chondracanthinae. Report of the Faculty of Fisheries, Prefectural University of Mie, 2, 70–111Google Scholar
  30. Tang, D., Andrews, M., Cobcroft J.M. 2007. The first chondracanthid (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) reported from cultured finfish, with a revised key to the species of Chondracanthus. Journal of Parasitology, 93, 788–795. DOI: 10.1645/GE-1121R.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walter, T.C., Boxshall G. 2017. World of copepods database. Accessed at http://www.marinespecies.org/copepoda on 2017-02-09Google Scholar
  32. Wilson C.B. 1908. North American parasitic copepods: a list of those found upon the fishes of the Pacific coast, with descriptions of new genera and species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 35, 431–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yuniar, A., Palm, H.W., Walter T. 2007. Crustacean fish parasites from Segara Anakan Lagoon, Java, Indonesia. Parasitology Research, 100, 1193–1204. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-006-0391-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Witold Stefański Institute of Parasitology, Polish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Gómez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hugo Aguirre-Villaseñor
    • 2
  • Francisco Neptali Morales-Serna
    • 3
  1. 1.Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoInstituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Unidad Académica MazatlánMéxico
  2. 2.Instituto Nacional de Pesca y AcuaculturaCentro Regional de Investigación PesqueraMazatlánMéxico
  3. 3.CONACyT, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y DesarrolloA.C. Unidad Mazatlán en Acuicultura y Manejo Ambiental, MazatlánMéxico

Personalised recommendations