Acta Parasitologica

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 214–219 | Cite as

Pathological and molecular studies of the renal trematode Paratanaisia bragai in Indian peafowls (Pavo cristatus)

  • M. Asok KumarEmail author
  • Deepak Kumar
  • Munuswamy Palanivelu
  • Latchumikanthan Annamalai
  • Karikalan Mathesh
  • Rajendra Singh
  • Anil Kumar Sharma
  • Kuldeep Dhama
Research Note


Endoparasitic diseases are commonly encountered in free-ranging birds. Although not all endoparasites cause disease, persistent infection with large numbers of parasites almost always affects normal physiological functions, leading to deleterious effects on the host. This paper describes the anatomopathological alterations caused by the renal trematode Paratanaisia bragai in Indian peafowl (n = 3) and examines the phylogeny of these and related parasites. Peafowl from forests in and around the Bareilly region, Uttar Pradesh, India, were necropsied, and microscopic and molecular investigations were performed. The peafowl were confirmed to be infected with P. bragai. Significant gross pathological lesions suggested nephrosis, and microscopic findings indicated a mild-to-moderate degree of nephrosis caused by the parasites in the tissue. The parasites were identified as P. bragai by histomorphological analysis of adult and eggs in the ureters, and the identification was confirmed by PCR and phylogenetic analysis. Nucleotide sequencing of the PCR products from the renal trematodes recovered from Indian peafowl revealed a close association with P. bragai from Columbiformes in the United Kingdom and Spain. The pathology and molecular epidemiology of parasitic diseases affecting peafowl is not well understood in India. This is the first report from India and the second report worldwide to document P. bragai infection in peafowl.


Kidney Paratanaisia peafowl phylogenetic analysis trematode 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdo W., Sultan K. 2013. Histopathological findings of the kidney trematode Paratanaisia spp. (Digenea: Eucotylidae) in cattle Egret (Bubulcus ibis). Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 22, 312–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schäffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 3389–3402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aulakh R.S., Bedi J.S., Sharma J.K. 2005. Pesticide associated mortality in peacocks. Indian Veterinary Journal, 82, 11–12Google Scholar
  4. Borah M.K., Rahman T., Goswami S., Islam S. 2009. On the incidence and pathology of Paratanaisia bragai dos Santos, 1934 (Freitas, 1959) infection in domestic pigeon (Columba livia). Journal of Veterinary Parasitology, 23, 159–161Google Scholar
  5. Brandolini S.V.P.B., Amato S.B., Pereira A.A. 1997. Relacionamento de Tanaisia bragai (Digenea, Eucotylidae) eseu hospedeiro intermediário, Subulina octona (Gastropoda, Subulinidae) sob condições experimentais. Parasitol al dia, 21, 109–113Google Scholar
  6. Costa R., Ambrósio N., Soares B., Bezerra Júnior P., Barçante T. 2015. Pathological and parasitological aspects of the peacock (Pavo cristatus) infection by Tanaisia (Paratanaisia) braga. Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira, 35, 466–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desingu P., Singh S., Dhama K., Vinodhkumar O., Barathidasan R. 2016. Molecular characterization, isolation, pathology and pathotyping of peafowl (Pavo cristatus) origin Newcastle disease virus isolates recovered from disease outbreaks in three states of India. Avian Pathology, 45, 674–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freitas M.F.L., Oliveira J.B., Cavalcanti M.D.B., Leite A.S., Magalhaes V.S. 2002. Gastrointestinal parasites of captive wild birds in Pernambuco state, Brazil. Parasitol Latinoam, 57, 50–54Google Scholar
  10. Gomes D., Menezes R., Tortelly R., Pinto R. 2005. Pathology and first occurrence of the kidney trematode Paratanaisia bragai (Santos, 1934) Freitas, 1959 (Digenea: Eucotylidae) in Phasianus colchicus L., 1758, from Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 100, 285–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaiswal A., Sudan V., Shanker D., Kumar P. 2012. Endoparasitic infections in Indian peacocks (Pavo cristatus) of Veterinary College Campus, Mathura. Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 37, 26–28PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Kanev I., Radev V., Fried B. 2002. Family Eucotylidae 1904. In: (Eds: D.I. Gibson, A. Jones, R.A. Bray) Vol. 1, CAB International Publishing, Wallingford, 147–153Google Scholar
  13. Keller D.G., Araujo J.L.B. 1992. Ciclo evolutivo de Paratanaisia bragai (Santos, 1934) (Trematoda, Eucotylidae) com novo hospedeiro intermediário no Brasil: Leptinaria unilamellata (D’Orbigny, 1835) (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Subulinidae) em condições de laboratório. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 1, 89–92Google Scholar
  14. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar A., Maan S., Mahajan N., Rana V., Jindal N. 2013. Detection and molecular characterization of Newcastle disease virus in peafowl (Pavo cristatus) in Haryana State, India. Indian Journal of Virology, 24, 380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33, 1870–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luna L.G. 1968. Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Mc Graw Hill 1968. New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Luppi M., de Melo A., Motta R., Malta M., Gardiner C. 2007. Granulomatous nephritis in psittacines associated with parasitism by the trematode Paratanaisia spp. Veterinary Parasitology, 146, 363–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malik M., Goswami S., Upadhyaya T.N., Phangcho C.V., Ara Begum S. 2016. Pathological and histochemical alterations of Paratanaisia bragai infection in domestic pigeon (Columba livia). Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology, 40, 157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mapeli E.B., Nascimento A.A., Szabó M.P.J., Tebaldi J.H. 2003. Infecções naturais por helmintos em perdizes (Rhynchotus rufescens Temminck, 1815) de cativeiro, no Município de Jaboticabal, estado de São Paulo. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico São Paulo, 70, 415–418. (In Spanish)Google Scholar
  21. Menezes R.C., Mattos-Junior D.G., Tortelly R., Muniz-Pereira L.C., Pinto R.M. 2001. Trematodes of free range reared guinea fowls (Numida Meleagris Linnaeus, 1758) in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: morphology and pathology. Avian Pathology, 30, 209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pinto R.M., Menezes R.C., Tortelly R. 2004. Systematic and pathologic study of Paratanaisia bragai (Santos, 1934) Freitas, 1959 (Digenea, Eucotylidae) in ruddy ground dove, Columbina talpacoti (Temminck, 1811). Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 56, 472–479. (In Spanish)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pollock C. 2006. Diagnosis and Treatment of Avian Renal Disease. Veterinary Clinics: Exotic Animal Practice, 9, 107–128Google Scholar
  24. Shetty P.K., Hiremath M.B., Murugan M., Nerli R.B. 2011. Farmer’s health externalities in pesticide use predominant regions in India. World Journal of Science and Tecchnology, 1, 1–11Google Scholar
  25. Shivaprasad H., Galey F. 2001. Diphacinone and zinc phosphide toxicity in a flock of Peafowl. Avian Pathology, 30, 599–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silva T., Pavan L., Guimarães-Okamoto P., Milbradt E., Andreatti Filho R. 2016. First record of Paratanaisia bragai (Digenea: Eucotylidae) in blue and gold macaw (Ara ararauna). Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 25, 112–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Unwin S., Chantrey J., Chatterton J., Aldhoun J., Littlewood D. 2013. Renal trematode infection due to Paratanaisia bragai in zoo housed Columbiformes and a red bird-of-paradise (Paradisaea rubra). International Journal of Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife, 2, 32–41Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Witold Stefański Institute of Parasitology, Polish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Asok Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Deepak Kumar
    • 2
  • Munuswamy Palanivelu
    • 1
  • Latchumikanthan Annamalai
    • 3
  • Karikalan Mathesh
    • 4
  • Rajendra Singh
    • 5
  • Anil Kumar Sharma
    • 5
  • Kuldeep Dhama
    • 1
  1. 1.Avian Diseases Section, Division of PathologyICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, IzatnagarBareillyIndia
  2. 2.Genetic Engineering Virus Laboratory, Division of Veterinary BiotechnologyICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, IzatnagarBareillyIndia
  3. 3.Veterinary University Training and Research Centre (VUTRC)VillupuramIndia
  4. 4.Centre for Wildlife, ICAR-Indian Veterinary ResearchInstitute, IzatnagarBareillyIndia
  5. 5.Division of PathologyICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, IzatnagarBareillyIndia

Personalised recommendations