Advertisement

Acta Parasitologica

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 836–848 | Cite as

A case of persisting massive infection of Scomberomorus commerson, a commercially exploited scombrid fish, with Cybicola armatus (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Pseudocycnidae)

  • Ameri Kottarathil Helna
  • Kappalli SudhaEmail author
  • Panakkool Thamban Aneesh
  • Wojciech Piasecki
  • Gopinathan Anilkumar
Article

Abstract

During an extensive survey of fish parasites along the Malabar coast of India we observed exceptionally high or even massive infection of the narrow-barred Spanish mackerel, Scomberomorus commerson (Scombridae), with parasitic copepods Cybicola armatus. Such infection has not hitherto been reported. The copepods occurred on the gills of its host and the infection persisted for many years (the survey lasted from January 2010 to July 2014). The overall prevalence was very high (95%); out of a total of 981 fish studied, 933 were infected, and the maximum intensity reached 42. The highest rate of infection (prevalence 99.2%) was observed in medium sized fish (36.0–79.9 cm). We found this parasite only on S. commerson even though we examined 81 fish species, including five of the family Scombridae. Interestingly, the parasite exhibits strict site specificity and microhabitat preference. A significant proportion of them was seen attached to pseudobranchs rather than to main gill arches. Significantly, the body size of the parasite was positively correlated with that of the host fish. Our SEM micrographs contributed new facts to this copepod’s morphology by illustrating for the first time the ventral part of its cephalothorax, illustrating the nature of attachment, and by finding a new structure — a premaxillary pad. We demonstrated the haematophagous nature of C. armatus by finding and documenting the host’s blood cells in the parasite’s intestine.

Keywords

Scomberomorus commerson parasitic copepod Cybicola armatus host-parasite interaction host specificity site specificity pseudobranch holobranch 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Aal A.A., Soliman M.F. 2004. Microhabitat and surface ultrastructure of Neothoracocotyle commersoni and Priceamultae (Monogenea: Microcotyloidea) from gills of scombrid fish, Scomberomorus commerson. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 34, 117–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdul Khalid N.Q., Shaharoum-Harrison F. 2014. The life cycle of the parasitic crustacean, Lernanthropus latis Yamaguti, 1954 (Copepoda: Lernanthropidae), on marine-cultured fish, Lates calcarifer, from Setiu Wetland, Terengganu. Journal of Parasitology Research, 697134, 6 pages. DOI: 10.1155/2014/697134Google Scholar
  3. Adel M., Azizi H.R., Nematolahi A. 2013. Scomberomorus commerson, a new paratenic host of Contracaecum sp. and Anisakis sp. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from Persian Gulf. World Journal of Fish and Marine Sciences, 5, 310–314Google Scholar
  4. Adlard R.D., Bryant M.S., Whipps C.M., Kent M.L. 2005 Multivalvulid myxozoans from eastern Australia: Three new species of Kudoa from scombrid and labrid fishes of the Great Barrier Reef, Queensland, Australia. Journal of Parasitology, 91, 1138–1142. DOI: 10.1645/GE-368R.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aloo P.A., Anam R.O., Mwangi J.N. 2004. Metazoan parasites of some commercially important fish along the Kenyan coast. Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science, 3, 71–78Google Scholar
  6. Aneesh P.T. 2014. Studies on parasitic crustaceans infecting the fishes of Malabar Coast. PhD Thesis, Kannur UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. Arthur J.R., Lumanlan-Mayo S. 1997. Checklist of the parasites of fishes of the Philippines. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 369, FAO, Rome. pp. 102Google Scholar
  8. Baker T.G., Pante E., de Buron I. 2005. Co-occurrence of Naobranchia lizae (Copepoda) and Metamicrocotyla macracantha (Monogenea), gill parasites of the striped mullet Mugil cephalus. Parasitology Research, 97, 515–520. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-005-1485-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bassett-Smith P.W. 1898a. Some new parasitic copepods found on fish at Bombay. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 1, 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bassett-Smith P.W. 1898b. Some new or rare parasitic copepods found on fish in the Indo-tropic region. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 11, 359–372Google Scholar
  11. Beveridge I., Bray R.A., Cribb T.H., Justine J.-L. 2014. Diversity of trypanorhynch metacestodes in teleost fishes from coral reefs off eastern Australia and New Caledonia. Parasite 21, 60. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2014060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boxshall G.A. 2005. Copepods. In: Rohde K. (Ed.), Marine Parasites. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Vic., Australia, pp.123–138Google Scholar
  13. Boxshall G.A., Halsey S.H. 2004. An introduction to copepod diversity. Ray Society, London. No. 166, pp. 966Google Scholar
  14. Bray R.A., Cribb T.H., Barker S.C. 1993. Hemiuridae (Digenea) from marine fishes of the Great Barrier Reef, Queensland, Australia. Systematic Parasitology, 25, 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruce N.L. 1990. Redescription of the ascaridoid nematode Hysterothylacium scomberomori (Yamaguti) from Australian Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus commerson (Lacepède). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 28, 427–434Google Scholar
  16. Bush A.O., Lafferty K.D., Lotz J.M., Shostak A.W. 1997. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms. Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology, 83, 575–583. DOI: 10.2307/3284227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cabral P., Coste F., Raibaut A. 1984. Cycle évolutif de Lernanthropus kroyerii Van Beneden, 1851, Copépode branchial hématophage du loup Dicentrarchus labrax (Linné, 1758) dans des populations naturelles et en élevage. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee, 59, 189–207 (In French)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Castro R., Santos M.J. 2013. Metazoan ectoparasites of Atlantic mackerel, Scomber scombrus (Teleostei: Scombridae): macroand microhabitat distribution. Parasitology Research, 112, 3579–3586. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-013-3543-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cavaleiro F.I., Santos M.J. 2011. Site selection of Acanthochondria cornuta (Copepoda: Chondracanthidae) in Platichthys flesus (Teleostei: Pleuronectidae). Parasitology, 138, 1061–1067. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980008002541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cressey R.F., Cressey H.B. 1979. The parasitic copepods of Indo-West Pacific lizardfishes (Synodontidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 196, 1–71. DOI: 10.5479/si.00810282.296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cressey R.F., Cressey H.B. 1980. The parasitic copepods of mackerel and tuna-like fishes (Scombridae) of the world. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 311, 1–186. DOI: 10.5479/si.00 810282.311.iGoogle Scholar
  22. Cressey R.F., Collette B.B., Russo L. 1983. Copepods and scombrid fishes: A study in host-parasite relationships. Fishery Bulletin, 81, 227–265Google Scholar
  23. de Meeûs T., Marin R., Renaud F. 1992. Genetic heterogeneity within populations of Lepeophtheirus europaensis (Copepoda, Caligidae) parasite on to host species. International Journal of Parasitology, 8, 1179–1181. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(92) 90039-NCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Froese R., Pauly D. 2016. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. Available from: http://www.Fishbase.org, Version (January 2016). Accessed 4 July 2016.Google Scholar
  25. Gnanamuthu C.P. 1950. Two dichelesthiid copepods from Madras fish. Parasitology, 40, 276–282. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182000018138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heegaard P.E. 1962. Parasitic Copepoda from Australian waters. Records of the Australian Museum, 25, 149–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hermida M., Cruz C., Saraiva A. 2012. Distribution of Hatschekia pagellibogneravei (Copepoda: Hatschekiidae) on the gills of Pagellus bogaraveo (Teleostei: Sparidae) from Madeira, Portugal. FoliaParasitologica, 59, 148–152. DOI: 10.14411/fp.2012.020Google Scholar
  28. Huys R., Boxshall G.A. 1991. Copepod evolution. Ray Society, London. No. 159, pp. 468Google Scholar
  29. Johnson S.C., Treasurer J.W., Bravo S., Nagasawa K., Kabata Z. 2004. A review of the impact of parasitic copepods on marine aquaculture. Zoological Studies, 43, 229–243Google Scholar
  30. Kabata Z. 1979. Parasitic Copepoda of British fishes. Ray Society, London. No. 152, pp. 468Google Scholar
  31. Kabata Z. 1982. Copepoda (Crustacea) parasitic on fishes: Problems and perspectives. Advances in Parasitology, 19, 1–71. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60265-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kensley B., Grindley J.R. 1973. South African parasitic Copepoda. Annals of the South African Museum, 62, 69–130Google Scholar
  33. Kirtisinghe P. 1935. Parasitic copepods of fish from Ceylon. Parasitology, 27, 332–344. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182000015249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirtisinghe P. 1937. On the genus Cybicola Basett-Smith (1898). Parasitology, 29, 453–456. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182000024987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirtisinghe P. 1964. A review of the parasitic copepods of fish recorded from Ceylon with description of additional forms. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Station, Ceylon 17, 45–132Google Scholar
  36. Kurian C.V. 1965. Parasitic copepods of fishes from Kerala — No. 3. Bulletin of the Research Institute, University of Kerala, 8, 63–66Google Scholar
  37. Lester R.J.G., Thompson C., Moss H., Barker S.C. 2001. Movement and stock structure of narrow-barred Spanish mackerel as indicated by parasites. Journal of Fish Biology, 59, 833–842. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb00154.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lin C.L., Ho J.S. 2006. Four species of Unicolax Cressey and Cressey, 1980 (Copepoda: Bomolochidae) parasitic on marine fishes of Taiwan. Zoological Studies, 45, 339–356Google Scholar
  39. Lo C.M., Morand S. 2001. Gill parasites of Cephalopholis argus (Teleostei: Serranidae) from Morrea (French Polynesia): Site selection and coexistence. Folia Parasitologica, 48, 30–36. DOI: 10.14411/fp.2001.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mattiucci S., Paggi L., Nascetti G., Portes Santos C., Costa G., Di Beneditto A.P., Ramos R., Argyrou M., Cianchi R., Bullini L. 2002. Genetic markers in the study of Anisakis typica (Diesing, 1860): larval identification and genetic relationships with other species of Anisakis Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda: Anisakidae). Systematic Parasitology, 51, 159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moore B.R., Buckworth R.C., Moss H., Lester R.J.G. 2003. Stock discrimination and movements of narrow-barred Spanish mackerel across northern Australia as indicated by parasites. Journal of Fish Biology, 63, 765–779. DOI: 10.1046/j.1095- 8649.2003.00190.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morton A.B., Routledge R. 2005. Mortality rates for juvenile pink Oncorhynchus gorbuscha and chum O. keta salmon infested with sea lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis in the Broughton Archipelago. Alaska Fishery Research Bulletin 11, 146–152Google Scholar
  43. Natarajan P., Balakrishnan Nair N. 1972. Observations on Pseudocycnus armatus (Bassett-Smith) parasitic on Indocybium guttatum (Bloch and Schn.). Hydrobiologia, 40, 69–76. DOI: 10.1007/BF00123593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nolan M.J., Cribb T.H. 2006. Cardicola Short, 1953 and Braya n. gen. (Digenea: Sanguinicolidae) from five families of tropical Indo-Pacific fishes. Zootaxa, 1265, 1–80Google Scholar
  45. Piasecki W. 1989. Life cycle of Tracheliastes maculatus Kollar, 1835 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida, Lernaeopodidae). Wiadomosci Parazytologiczne, 35, 187–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Piasecki W. 1994. Infection seasonality of Tracheliastes maculatus Kollar, 1835 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida, Lernaeopodidae) in the warm-water canal of the “Dolna Odra” power plant. Wiadomosci Parazytologiczne, 40, 187–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Piasecki W., Avenant-Oldewage A. 2008. Diseases caused by Crustacea. pp. 1113–1198. In: Eiras J., Segner H., Wahli T., Kapoor B.G. (Eds.) Fish diseases. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, USA, pp. 1200Google Scholar
  48. Piasecki W., Goodwin A.E., Eiras J.C., Nowak B.F. 2004. Importance of Copepoda in freshwater aquaculture. Zoological Studies, 43, 193–205Google Scholar
  49. Piasecki W., MacKinnon B.M. 1995. Life cycle of a sea louse, Caligus elongatus von Nordmann, 1832 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida, Caligidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 73, 74–82. DOI: 10.1139/z95-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pillai N.K. 1964. A miscellaneous collection of copepods parasitic on South Indian fishes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 6, 61–83Google Scholar
  51. Pillai N.K. 1985. The fauna of India: Copepod parasites of marine fishes. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, pp. 900Google Scholar
  52. Ramasamy P., Ramalinga M.K., Hanna R.E.B., Halton D.W. 1985. Microhabitats of gill parasites (Monogenea and Copepoda) of teleosts (Scomberoides spp.). International Journal of Parasitology, 15, 385–397. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(85)90023-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rohde K. 1980. Host specificity indices of parasites and their application. Experientia, 36, 1369–1371. DOI: 10.1007/BF01960103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rohde K. 1993. Ecology of marine parasites, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 298Google Scholar
  55. Rohde K. 1994. Niche restriction in parasites: proximate and ultimate causes. Parasitology, 109: S69–S84. DOI: 10.1017/ s0031182000085097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Samotylova N.N. 2011. Representatives of Cyclopoida and Siphonostomatoida (Crustacea: Copepoda) in Vietnamese fauna. Izvestja Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rosijskoj akademii nauk, 13, 1146–1148. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  57. Scott-Holland T.B., Bennett S.M., Bennett M.B. 2006. Distribution of an asymmetrical copepod, Hatschekia plectropomi, on the gills of Plectropomus leopardus. Journal of Fish Biology, 68, 222–235. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.00895.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sethi S. 2012. Occurence [sic] of parasitic copepods, Lernaeenicus sprattae on king mackerel (Scomberomorus commerson), along south-east of India. e-planet 10, 36–38Google Scholar
  59. Shaharom F.M., Lester R.J.G. 1982. Description of and observations on Grillotia branchi n.sp., a larval trypanorhynch from the branchial arches of the Spanish mackerel, Scomberomorus commerson. Systematic Parasitology, 4, 1–6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00012227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shinn A.P., Pratoomyot J., Bron J.E., Paladini G., Brooker E.E., Brooker A.J. 2015. Economic costs of protistan and metazoan parasites to global mariculture. Parasitology, 142, si1, 196–270. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182014001437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Silas E.G., Ummerkutty A.N.P. 1967. Parasites of scombroid fishes. Part II. Parasitic Copepoda. Proceedings of the Symposium on scombroid fishes held at Mandapam Camp from January 12–15, 1962. Part III. Symposium Series I, Marine Biological Association of India, Mandapam Camp, S. India, pp. 876–993Google Scholar
  62. Sasidharan Pillai N.K. 1984. Studies on the copepod fish parasites of Kerala coast. PhD Thesis. Department of Industrial Fisheries, University of Cochin, Cohin, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  63. Székely C., Láng M., Molnár K. 2010. Role of the copepod parasite Tracheliastes maculatus Kollar, 1836 (Lernaeopodidae) in the common bream (Abramis brama) mortality occurring in Lake Balaton, Hungary. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists, 30, 170–176Google Scholar
  64. Whipps C.M., Adlard R.D., Bryant M.S., Kent M.L. 2003. Two unusual myxozoans, Kudoa quadricornis n. sp. (Multivalvulida) from the muscle of goldspotted trevally (Carangoides fulvoguttatus) and Kudoa permulticapsula n. sp. (Multivalvulida) from the muscle of Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus commerson) from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Journal of Parasitology, 89, 168–173. DOI: 10.1645/0022-3395 (2003)089[0168:TUMKQN]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williams R.E., Lester R.J.G. 2006. Stock structure of Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus commerson along the Australian east coast deduced from parasite data. Journal of Fish Biology, 68, 1707–1712. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01026.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson C.B. 1922. North American parasitic copepods belonging to the family Dichelesthiidae. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 60, 1–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson J.M., Laurent P. 2002. Fish gill morphology: Inside out. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 293, 192–213. DOI: 10.1002/jez.10124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yamaguti S. (Ed.) 1963. Parasitic Copepoda and Branchiura of fishes. Interscience Publishers, New York, pp. 1104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Witold Stefański Institute of Parasitology, Polish Academy of Sciences 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ameri Kottarathil Helna
    • 1
  • Kappalli Sudha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Panakkool Thamban Aneesh
    • 1
  • Wojciech Piasecki
    • 2
  • Gopinathan Anilkumar
    • 3
  1. 1.Post Graduate Department of Zoology and Research CentreSree Narayana CollegeKannurIndia
  2. 2.University of SzczecinFaculty of GeosciencesSzczecinPoland
  3. 3.School of Biosciences and TechnologyVIT UniversityVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations