Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 141–168 | Cite as

An Analytical Framework for the Relationship between Environmental Measures and Economic Growth Based on the Régulation Theory: Key Concepts and a Simple Model

Article

Abstract

This paper proposes an analytical framework using the régulation approach and consisting of explanations of some concepts and a simple way of modeling; the concepts and modeling are developed by focusing on the distributive aspect of environmental issues and using environmental costs as key indices. As a basis for the framework, we refer to the ideas of Polanyi and the surplus approach, and we recognize the socio-economic system as interlinked triple reproductions of the economy, humans, and the environment. This recognition is formalized as an equation of three-dimensional distributions among profits, wages and rents. The “economy-environment nexus,” which represents the relationship between the natural environment’s reproduction and economic reproduction, is analyzed as one of the institutional forms. The dynamics of institutional coordination are specified with attention to distributive conflicts between relevant actors, leading to the idea of “spatial and temporal gaps of coordination.” Environmental costs are identified and incorporated into the equation of distribution as key information to characterize specific forms of the economy-environment nexus. The economy-environment nexus influences growth regimes through multiple routes, including investment, trade, and productivities. In order to analyze the aggregate effects, we propose a variant of the Kaleckian growth model incorporating environmental costs as key variables. Using this model, we specify conditions for the “paradox of costs for environmental measures,” where environmental measures raise the profit rate. This framework is expected to be used in historical or comparative analyses of particular economies, including those using periodized specification of the economy-environment nexus.

Keywords

régulation theory Kaleckian model environment environmental cost green growth 

JEL

B52 E12 Q50 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amable, B. (2003) The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaud, M. (1997) Le Basculement du Monde: De la Terre, des hommes et du capitalism (in French), La Découverte, Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, J. and W. Raza (1999) “Theory of Régulation and Political Ecology: an Inevitable Separation?,” Ambiente & Sociedade 5.5: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blecker, R. A. (2002) “Distribution, demand and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro models,” in M. Setterfield (ed.) The Economics of Demand-led Growth: Challenging the Supplyside Vision of the Long Run, Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp. 129–152.Google Scholar
  5. Bortis, H. (1997) “Notes on the surplus approach in political economy,” in P. Arestis, G. Harcourt and M. Sawyer (eds.) Capital Controversy, Post-Keynesian Economics and the History of Economic Thought, Routlege, London, pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
  6. Boyer, R. (1986) La Théorie de la Régulation: Une Analyse Critique (in French), La Découverte, Paris.Google Scholar
  7. Boyer, R. (1988) “Formalizing Growth Regimes” in G. Dosi, F. Christopher, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds.) Technical Change and Economic Theory, Printer Publishers, London, pp. 608–630.Google Scholar
  8. Boyer, R. (2000) “The Political in the Era of Globalization and Finance; Focus on Some Régulation School Research,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24.2: 274–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyer, R. and R. Hollingsworth (1997) “From National Embeddedness to Spatial and Institutional Nestedness,” in R. Boyer and R. Hollingsworth (eds.) Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 433–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassetti, M. (2003) “Bargaining power, effective demand and technical progress: a Kaleckian model of growth,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27.3: 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Central Environment Policy Council (2010) Interim Report on Vision of Policies and Measures to Achieve the Mid- and Long-term Emissions Reduction Targets (in Japanese), http://www.challenge25.go.jp/roadmap/
  12. Daly, H. and J. B. Cobb (1989) For the Common Good; Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future, Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  13. Environment Agency (1992) Quality of the Environment in Japan 1992, Environment Agency, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  14. Funabashi, H. (1998) “Future of the Environmental Problems and Social Change” (in Japanese), in H. Funabashi and N. IIjima (eds.) Lectures on Sociology 12: Environment, Tokyo University Press, Tokyo, pp. 191–224.Google Scholar
  15. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971) The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holt, R. P. F., S. Pressman and C. L. Spash (eds.) (2009) Post-Keynesian and Ecological Economics, Edward Elgar, Northampton.Google Scholar
  17. Kapp, K. W. (1950) The Social Costs of Private Enterprise, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  18. Kronenberg, T. (2010) “Finding common ground between ecological economics and post-Keynesian economics,” Ecological Economics 69.7: 1488–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lavoie, M. (1992) Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  20. Lavoie, M. (2010) “Surveying short-run and long-run stability issues with the Kalickian model of growth” in M. Setterfirld (ed.) Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, Edward Elger, Northampton, pp. 132–156.Google Scholar
  21. Lipietz, A. (1995) “Ecologie politique régulationniste ou économie de l’environnement? (in French),” in R. Boyer and Y. Saillard (eds.) Théorie de la Régulation: L’état des savoirs, La Découverte, Paris, pp. 350–356.Google Scholar
  22. Lipietz, A. (1999) Qu’est-ce que l’Écologie Politique?: La Grande Transformation du XXIe Siècle (in French), La Découverte, Paris.Google Scholar
  23. Marglin, S. A. and A. Bhaduri (1991) “Profit squeeze and Keynesian theory,” in E. J. Nell and W. Semmler (eds.) Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics: Confrontation or Convergence? Macmillan, London, pp. 123–163.Google Scholar
  24. Pasinetti, L. L. (1973) “The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis,” Metroeconomica 25.1: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Polanyi, K. (1957) Great Transformation, Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  26. Rousseau, S. and B. Zuindeau (2007) “Théorie de la Régulation et Développement Durable” (in French), Revue de la régulation 1.Google Scholar
  27. Rowthorn, R. (1982) “Demand, Real Wages and Economic Growth,” Sutudi Economici 18.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, L. (2004) Reconstructing Macroeconomics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  29. Uemura, H. (2007) “Reproduction of Socio-economic System and Inequity in Distribution,” Political Economy Quarterly 43.4: 5–15.Google Scholar
  30. Uni, H. (2011) “Economic Growth and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: An Analysis Using a Cumulative Causation Model,” Paper for European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy 2011 Conference.Google Scholar
  31. United Nations, European Commission, IMF, OECD and World Bank (2003) Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003, http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/pubs.asp.
  32. Yamada, T. (1991) Régulation Approach (in Japanese), Fujiwara-shoten, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  33. Yamada, T. (2007) “Diversity in Capitalist Economy” (in Japanese), Japanese Journal of Comparative Economics 44.1: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zuindeau, B. (2007) “Régulation School and environment: Theoretical proposals and avenues of research,” Ecological Economics 62.2: 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Graduate School of Social SciencesYokohama National UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations