Multilevel Selection Processes in Economics: Theory and Methods

  • Natalia Zinovyeva


The paper reviews the main directions of research in evolutionary economics related to the analysis of multilevel selection processes, where multilevel selection refers to the operation of the natural selection at individual and group level. The study reviews the history and the applications of multilevel selection approach and summarizes the main findings with respect to the role of the group in evolutionary dynamics. It also describes how the aggregate evolutionary dynamics could be decomposed into innovation and selection effects using famous George Price’ s decomposition developed for the analysis of biological evolution.


multilevel selection group selection Price’ s decomposition 


B25 L20 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen, E. S. (2003a) “A note on Price’ s equation for evolutionary economics: derivation, interpretations, and simple applications,” Working paper at DRUID/IKE, Dept. of Business Studies, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, E. S. (2003b) “Population thinking and evolutionary economic analysis,” (Draft of Postscript for the Japanese edition of Andersen’ s Evolutionary Economics: Post-Schumpeterian Contributions).Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, E. S. (2004) “Population thinking, Price’ s equation and the analysis of economic evolution”, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 1.1: 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur, W. B., Y. M. Ermoliev and Y. M. Kaniovski (1984) “Strong Laws for a Class of Path-dependent Stochastic Processes with Applications,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Stochastic Optimization, Berlin, Springer, 287–300.Google Scholar
  5. Astley, W. G. (1985) “The Two Ecologies: Population and Community Perspectives on Organizational Evolution,” Administrative Science Quartely 30.2: 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartelsman, E. J. and M. Doms (2000) “Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata,” Journal of Economic Literature 38: 569–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergstrom, T. C. (2002) “Evolution of Social Behavior: Individual and Group Selection,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16.2: 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boorman, S. A. and P. R. Levitt (1973) “Group Selection on the Boundary of a Stable Population,” Theoretical Population Biology 4: 85–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowles, S., J. K. Choi and A. Hopfensitz (2003) “The Co-evolution of Individual Behaviors and Social Institutions,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 223.2: 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowles, S., J. K. Choi and H. Gintis (2005) “Can Self-interest Explain Cooperation?,” Evolutionary and Institutional Economic Review 2.1: 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buenstorf, G. (2006) “How Useful Is Universal Darwinism as a Framework to Study Competition and Industrial Evolution?,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16.5: 511–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, D. (1974) “Evolutionary epistemology”, in Schilpp (ed) The Philosophy of Karl R. Popper, vol. 1, LaSalle, IL: Open Court, pp. 412–463.Google Scholar
  13. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and M. W. Feldman (1973) “Models for Cultural Inheritance: Group Mean and Within Group Variation,” Theoretical Population Biology 4.42: 42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cordes, C. (2006) “Darwinism in Economics: From Analogy to Continuity,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16.5: 529–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalle, J.-M., P. A. David, R. A. Ghosh and F. A. Wolak (2004) “Free and Open Source Software Creation and the Economy of Regard: Participation and Code-Signing in the Modules of the Linux Kernel,” A Presentation at OWLS: The Oxford Workshop on Libre Source Convened at the Oxford Internet Institute, 25–26th June 2004.Google Scholar
  16. Dosi, G. (2005) “Statistical Regularities in the Evolution of Industries. A Guide through some Evidence and Challenges for the Theory,” LEM working paper No. 2005/17, Sant’ Anna School of Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
  17. Dosi, G., O. Marsili, L. Orsenigo and R. Salvatore (1995) “Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of Industrial Structures,” Small Business Economics 7: 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dosi, G. and S. G Winter (2000) “Interpreting Economic Change: Evolution, Structures and Games,” LEM working paper No. 2000/08, Sant’ Anna School of Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
  19. Eldredge, N. (1999) The Pattern of Evolution, New York: W H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
  20. Emlen, S. T. and P. H. Wrege (1988) “The role of kinship in helping decisions among white-fronted bee-eaters,” Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology 23: 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eshel, I. (1972) “Neighbor Effect and the Evolution of Altruistic Traits,” Theoretical Population Biology 3.3: 258–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fagiolo, G. (2005) “Endogenous neighborhood formation in a local coordination model with negative network externalities,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier 29.1-2:297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fagiolo, G. and Dosi, G. (2003) “Exploitation, exploration and innovation in a model of endogenous growth with locally interacting agents,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier 14.3: 237–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fehr, E. and Gachter, S. (2000) “Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments,” American Economic Review 90.4: 980–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Field, A. J. (2008) “Why Multilevel Selection Matters,” Journal of Bioeconomics, 10: 203–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frank, S. A. (1995) “George Price’ s contributions to evolutionary genetics,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 175: 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Friedman, D. (1991) “Evolutionary Games in Economics,” Econometrica 59.3: 637–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gintis, H. (2000) “Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 206.2: 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gould, S. J. (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  30. Gould, S. J. and E. A. Lloyd (1999) “Individuality and adaptation across levels of selection: How shall we name and generalize the unit of Darwinism?,” Proceedings of National Academy of Science, USA 96.21: 11904–11909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gould, S. J. and N. Eldredge (1977) “Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered,” Paleobiology 3: 115–151.Google Scholar
  32. Gould, S. J. and R. C. Lewontin (1979) “The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme,” Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 205: 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heisler, I. L. and J. Damuth (1987) “A method for analysing selection in hierar-chically structured populations,” American Naturalist 130: 582–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henrich, J. (2004) “Cultural Group Selection, Coevolutionary Processes and Large-scale Cooperation,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 53: 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hodgson, G. M. (2002) “Darwinism in Economics: From Analogy to Ontology,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12: 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hodgson, G. M. and T. Knudsen (2006) “The Nature and the Units of Social Selection,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16.5: 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hull, D., R. Langman and S. Glenn (2001) “A General Account of Selection: Biology, Immunology and behavior,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jacoby, N. (2002) “Internal Selection of R&D projects: An Evolutionary Simulation Model,” 8th International Conference of the Society for Computational Economics, 27–29 June, Aixen-Provence.Google Scholar
  39. Kagel, J. H. and A. E. Roth (1995) The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  40. Kirman, A. (1994) “Economies with Interacting Agents,” Working Papers 94-05-030, Santa Fe Institute.Google Scholar
  41. Kirman, A. (1997) “The economy as an evolving network,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer 7.4: 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knudsen, T. (2002) “Economic selection theory,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12: 443–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lehman M. and L. Belady (1985) Program Evolution—Processes of Software Change, Academic Press, London, p. 538.Google Scholar
  44. Llerena, P. and A. Lorentz (2004) “Co-evolution of Macro-Dynamics and Technological Change: An Alternative View on Growth,” Revue d’ Economie Industrielle 105: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maynard Smith, J. (1976) “Group Selection,” Quarterly Review of Biology 51: 277–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maynard Smith, J. and G R. Price (1973) “The logic of animal conflict,” Nature 246: 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mayr, E. (1999) “Understanding Evolution,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14.9: 372–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Metcalfe, J. S. (1998) Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Metcalfe, J. S. (2008) “Accounting for economic evolution: Fitness and the population method,” Journal of Bioeconomics 10: 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mokyr, J. (2000) “Evolutionary phenomena in technological change,” in J. M. Ziman (ed) Technological innovation as an evolutionary process, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Myers, C. (2003) “Software Systems as complex networks: structure, function, and evolvability of software collaboration graphs,” Physical Review E 68. 046116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nelson, R. R. (1995) “Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change,” Journal of Economic Literature 33.1: 48–90.Google Scholar
  53. Nelson, R. R. (2001) “The coevolution of technology and institutions as the driver of economic growth,” in J. Foster and J. S. Metcalfe (eds) Frontiers of Evolutionary Economics: Competition, Self-Organization and Innovation Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. Okasha, S. (2003) “Multi-Level Selection, Prices Equation and Causality,” Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, LSE, Technical Report 13/03.Google Scholar
  55. Penrose, E. T. (1952) “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm,” American Economic Review 42: 804–819.Google Scholar
  56. Price, G. R. (1970) “Selection and covariance,” Nature 227: 520–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Price, G. R. (1972) “Fisher’ s ‘fundamental theorem’ made clear,” Annals of Human Genetics 36.2: 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Richarson, P. J. and R. Boyd (2005) Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  59. Richarson, P. J. and J. Henrich (2003) “The Cultural Evolution of Human Cooperation,” in P. Hammerstein (ed) The Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. pp. 357–388.Google Scholar
  60. Szabo, G., A. Szolnoki and J. Vukov (2009) “Selection of dynamical rules in spatial Prisoner’ s Dilemma games,” A Letters Journal Exploring the Frontiers of Physics 87: 18007.Google Scholar
  61. Silverberg, G., G Dosi, and L. Orsenigo (1988) “Innovation, Diversity and Diffusion: A Self-Organisation Model,” The Economic Journal 98: 1032–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Silverberg, G., G Dosi, and L. Orsenigo (1997) “Evolutionary Modeling in Economics: Recent History and Immediate Prospects,” Paper for the workshop on “Evolutionary Economics as a Scienti. Research Programme,” Stockholm, May 26–27.Google Scholar
  63. Simpson, G. G. (1944) Tempo and Mode in Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  64. Sober, E. and D. S. Wilson (1994) “Reintroducing Group Selection to the Human Behavioral Sciences,” Behavior and Brain Sciences 17: 585–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Verspagen, B. (2002) “Evolutionary Macroeconomics: A synthesis between neo-Schumpeterian and post-Keynesian lines of thought,” The Electronic Journal of Evolutionary Modeling and Economic Dynamics, 1007.
  66. Williams, G. C. (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  67. Witt, U. (2004) “On Novelty and Heterogeneity,” Working paper No. 0405, Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems, Evolutionary Economics Group.Google Scholar
  68. Wynne-Edwards, V. C. (1962) Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour, Hafner Publishing Company. New York, NY.Google Scholar
  69. Ziman, J. (2000) “Evolutionary Models for Technological Change,” in J. Ziman (ed) Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fundación de Estudios de Economía AplicadaFEDEAMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations