Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 189–196 | Cite as

Toward an Incentive Alignment Theory of Nonprofit Organization

Note

Abstract

By analogy with some of the economic theories of the for-profit firm, this paper rationalizes the governance features of nonprofit organization, such as the nondistribution constraint and the self-governing character, as instruments for aligning the incentives of nonprofit firms’ stakeholders. Whereas incentive alignment in for-profit firms is aimed at minimizing opportunism, its aim in nonprofit firms is shown to consist of preventing the crowding out of intrinsic motivation. The nondistribution constraint and the self-governing character achieve this aim by switching off, respectively, monetary and administrative incentives. Since switching off administrative incentives means reducing the role of monitoring and sanctioning, nonprofit firms are subject to the risk of excessive shirking if they are entered by individuals lacking relevant intrinsic motivation. To protect themselves from being so exploited, nonprofit firms need to use screening devices, of which the payment of relatively low wages is one example.

Keywords

nonprofit firm incentive alignment intrinsic motivation crowding-out effect opportunism screening 

JEL

D02 D23 L31 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchian, A. and H. Demsetz (1972) “Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization,” American Economic Review 62: 777–795.Google Scholar
  2. Barkema, H. (1995) “Do Job Executives Work Harder When They Are Monitored?” Kyklos 48: 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coase, R. (1937) “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica 4: 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Enzle, M. and S. Anderson (1993) “Surveillant Intentions and Intrinsic Motivation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen (1983) “Agency Problems and Residual Claims,” Journal of Law and Economics 16: 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frey, B. (1997) Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation, Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  7. - and L. Goette (1999) Does Pay Motivate Volunteers? (Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Empirical Economic Research, University of Zuerich, Switzerland)Google Scholar
  8. - and R. Jegen (2001) “Motivation Crowding Theory: A Survey of Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Economic Surveys 15.5: 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Furubotn, E. and S. Pejovich (1972) “Property Rights and Economic Theory: a Survey of Recent Literature,” Journal of Economic Literature 10: 1137–1162.Google Scholar
  10. Handy, F. and E. Katz (1998) “The Wage Differential between Nonprofit Institutions and Corporations: Getting More by Paying Less?” Journal of Comparative Economics 26: 246–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansmann, H. (1980) “The role of nonprofit enterprise,” Yale Law Journal 89.5: 835–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klein, B., R. Crawford and A. Alchian (1978) “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents and the Competitive Contracting Process,” Journal of Law and Economics 21: 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ortmann, A. and M. Schlesinger (1997) “Trust, Repute, and the Role of Nonprofit Enterprise,” Voluntas 8.2: 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Osterloh, M. and B. Frey (2000) “Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Form,” Organization Studies 11.5: 538–550.Google Scholar
  15. Preston, A. (1989) “The Nonprofit Worker in a For-Profit World,” Journal of Labor Economics 7: 38–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Salamon, L. and H. Anheier (1992) “In Search of the Nonprofit Sector,” Voluntas 3.2: 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Steinberg, R. (1990) “Labor Economics and the Nonprofit Sector: A Literature Review,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 19.2: 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Titmuss, R. (1970) The Gift Relationship—From Human Blood to Social Policy, Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  19. Weisbrod, B. (1983) “Wage Differentials Between the Private For-Profit and Nonprofit Sectors: The Case of Lawyers,” Journal of Labor Economics 1: 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Williamson, O. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Young, D. (1983) If Not For Profit, For What? Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern EuropeStiftung des öffentlichen RechtsHalle (Saale)Germany

Personalised recommendations