Effects of a Group-Based 8-Week Multicomponent Cognitive Training on Cognition, Mood and Activities of Daily Living among Healthy Older Adults: A One-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Patsri SrisuwanEmail author
  • D. Nakawiro
  • S. Chansirikarnjana
  • O. Kuha
  • P. Chaikongthong
  • T. Suwannagoot
Original Research



Cognitive interventions have the potential to enhance cognition among healthy older adults. However, little attention has been paid to the effect of cognitive training (CT) on mood and activities of daily living (ADL).


To assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent CT using a training program of executive functions, attention, memory and visuospatial functions (TEAM-V Program) on cognition, mood and instrumental ADL.


A randomized, single-blinded, treatment-as-usual controlled trial.


Geriatric clinic in Bangkok, Thailand.


77 nondemented community-dwelling older adults (mean age 65.7±4.3 years).


The CT (TEAM-V) program or the treatmentas- usual controlled group. The TEAM-V intervention was conducted over 5 sessions, with a 2-week interval between each session. Of 77 participants randomized (n=40 the TEAM-V program; n=37 the control group).


The Thai version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), Thai version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and The Chula ADL were used to assess at baseline, 6 months and 1 year.


Compared with the control arm, the TEAM-V Program was associated with reducing anxiety (P = 0.004). Compared with the baseline, participants receiving the TEAM-V Program were associated with significantly improved general cognition (MoCA, P < 0.001), immediate recall (word recall task, P = 0.01), retrieval and retention of memory process (word recognition task, P = 0.01), attention (number cancellation part A, P < 0.001) and executive function (maze test, P = 0.02) at 1 year. No training effects on depression (P = 0.097) and IADL (P = 0.27) were detected.


The TEAM-V Program was effective in reducing anxiety. Even though, the program did not significantly improve cognition, depression and ADL compared with the control group, global cognition, memory, attention and executive function improved in the intervention group compared with baseline. Further studies incorporating a larger sample size, longitudinal follow-up and higher-intensity CT should be conducted.

Key words

Key words Activities of daily livings cognitive training mood older adults 



The authors would like to express our gratitude to the participants and PMK aging team in Geriatric Clinic, Phramongkutklao Hospital. We also would like to thank the Institute of Geriatric Medicine for allowing the research team to be a part of the larger study and conducted project activities in the Central region of Thailand. We also thank Ms. Worarachanee Imjaijitt for statistical analysis.


The research project was partially supported by The Thai Health Promotion Foundation. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the preparation of the manuscript; or in the review or approval of the manuscript.

Ethical standards

The TEAM-V study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Royal Thai Army Medical Department Ethics Committee as instituted by the Declaration of Helsinski.

Supplementary material


  1. 1.
    Martin M, Clare L, Altgassen AM, Cameron MH, Zehnder F. Cognitivebased interventions for healthy older people and people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006220. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li Ting, Yao Ye, Cheng Y, Xu B, Cao Xinyi, Waxman D, et al. Cognitive training can reduce the rate of cognitive aging; a neuroimaging cohort study. BMC Geriatrics 2016;16:12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith GE. Healthy cognitive aging and dementia prevention. Am Psychol 2016; 71(4):268–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bahar-Fuchs A, Clare L, Woods B. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for persons with mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s or vascular type: a review. Alzheimers Res Ther 2013; 5(4):35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lenze EJ, Bowie CR. Cognitive training for older adults: what works?. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66(4):645–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rebok GW, Ball K, Guey LT, Jones RN, Kim HY, King JW, et al. Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; 62(1):16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiu HL, Chu H, Tsai JC, Liu D, Chen YR, Yang HL, et al. The effect of cognitive-based training for the healthy older people: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2017; 12(5);e0176742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mah L, Szabuniewicz C, Fiocco AJ. Can anxiety damage the brain?. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2016; 29:56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diamond K, Mowszowski L, Cockayne N, Norrie L, Paradise M, Hermens DF, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a healthy brain ageing cognitive training program: effects on memory, mood, and sleep. J Alzheimers Dis 2015; 44(4):1181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Belleville S, Hudon C, Bier N, Brodeur C, Gilbert B, Grenier S. et al. MEMO+: Efficacy, Durability and Effect of Cognitive Training and Psychosocial Intervention in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66(4):655–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Butler M, McCreedy E, Nelson VA, Desai P, Ratner E, Fink HA, et al. Does Cognitive Training Prevent Cognitive Decline?: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168(1):63–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chaiwong P, Rattakorn P, Mumkhetvit P. Effect of cognitive training program on cognitive abilities and quality of life in elderly with suspected dementia. Bull Chiang Mai Assoc Med Sci 2015; 48(3): 182–91.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chaikham A, Putthinoi S, Lersilp S, Bunpun A, Chakpitak N. Cognitive training program for Thai older people with mild cognitive impairment. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2016; 36:42–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakawiro D, Chansirikarnjana S, Srisuwan P, Aebthaisong O, Sudsakorn P, Vidhyachak C, et al. Group-based training of executive function, attention, memory and visuospatial function (Team-V) in patient with mild neurocognitive disorder. J Psychiatr Assoc Thailand 2017; 62(4):337–48.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sukontapol C, Kemsen S, Chansirikarn S, Nakawiro D, Kuha O, Taemeeyapradit U. The effectiveness of a cogntivie training program in people with mild cognitive impairment: A study in urban community. Asian J Psychiatr 2018; 35:18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jirayucharoensak S1,2, Israsena P1, Pan-Ngum S2, Hemrungrojn S3, Maes M3. A game-based neurofeedback training system to enhance cognitive performance in healthy elderly subjects and in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Clin Interv Aging 2019; 14:347–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Srisuwan P, Nakawiro D, Chansirikarnjana S, Kuha O, Janbumrung S, Thammachot T. Effects of group-based multicomponent cognitive training on cognition, mood and instrumental activities of daily living among older people living in the community. Int J Med Biomed Sci 2019; 3(2):102–13.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nilchaikovit T, Lortrakul M, Phisansuthideth U. Development of Thai version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in cancer patients. J Psychiatr Assoc Thailand 1996; 41(1):18–30.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Julayanont P, Tangwongchai S, Hemrungrojn S, Tunvirachaisakul C, Panthumchinda K, Hongsawat J, et al. The montreal cognitive assessmentbasic; as creening tool for mild cognitive impairment in illiterate and loweducated elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63(12):2550–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340:c869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 1984; 141:1356–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohs RC, Knopman D, Petersen RC, Ferris SH, Ernesto C, Grundman M, et al. Development of cognitive instruments for use in clinical trials of antidementia drugs: additions to Alzheimer’s Disease assessment scale that broaden its scope. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997; 11(Suppl 2):S13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jitapunkul S, Kamolratanakul P, Ebrahim S. The meaning of activities of daily living in a Thai elderly population; development of a new index. Age Ageing 1994; 23(2):332–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim H, Yang Y, Oh J, Oh S, Choi H, Kim KH, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based multidomain cognitive intervention program in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016;16:191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    ten Brinke LF, Davis JC, Barha CK, Liu-Ambrose T. Effects of computerized cognitive training on neuroimaging outcomes in older adults: a systematic review. BMC Geriatrics 2017; 17:139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chapman SB, Aslan S, Spence JS, Hart JJ, Bartz EK, Didehbani N, et al. Neural mechnisms of brain plasticity with complex cognitive training in healthy seniors. Cerebral Cortex 2015; 25:396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wixted JT. Conditions and consequences of maintenance rehearsal. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1991;17(5):963–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Camos V, Portrat S. The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall. Psychon Bull Rev 2015; 22(4):1029–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang M, Chang C, Su S. What’s cooking?- Cognitive training of executive function in the elderly. Front Psychol 2011; 2:228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wennberg A, Kueider A, Spira A, Adams G, Rager R, Rebok G. Online Attention Training for Older Adults. Int J Cogn Technol 2014; 19(2):13–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cooley SA, Heaps JM, Bolzenius JD, Salminen LE, Baker LM, Scott SE, et al. Longitudinal change in performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in older adults. Clin Neuropsychol 2015; 29(6):824–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Trés ES, Brucki SM. Visuospatial processing: A review from basic to current concepts. Dement Neuropsychol 2014; 8(2): 175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tippett WJ, Rizkalla MN. Brain training: rationale, methods, and pilot data for a specific visuomotor/visuospatial activity program to change progressive cognitive decline. Brain Behav 2014; 4(2):171–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smith M, Jones MP, Dotson MM, Wolinsky FD. Computerized cognitive training to improve mood in senior living settings: design of a randomized controlled trial. Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials 2018; 10:29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim HJ, Yang Y, Oh JG, Oh S, Choi H, Kim KH, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based multidomain cognitive intervention program in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16(2):191–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu J, Rozelle S, Xu Q, Yu N, Zhou T. Social Engagement and Elderly Health in China: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019; 16(2):278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, et al. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults; a randomized controlled trial JAMA 2002; 288(18):2271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jones RN. Cognitive training improves cognitive performances, but what else?. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66:648–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Giuli C, Fattoretti P, Gagliardi C, Mocchegiani E, Venarucci D, Balietti M, et al. My Mind Project: the effects of cognitive training for elderly-the study protocol of a prospective randomized intervention study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2017; 29(3):353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sanders LMJ, Hortobágyi T, la Bastide-van Gemert S, van der Zee EA, van Heuvelen MJG. Dose-response relationship between exercise and cognitive function in older adults with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14(1):e0210036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Evans IEM, Llewellyn DJ, Matthews FE, Woods RT, Brayne C, Clare L, et al. Social isolation, cognitive reserve, and cognition in healthy older people. PLoS One 2018; 13(8):e0201008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Baumgart M, Snyder HM, Carrillo MC, Fazio S, Kim H, Johns H. Summary of the evidence on modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia: a population-based perspective. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 2015; 11:718–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Serdi and Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patsri Srisuwan
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Nakawiro
    • 2
  • S. Chansirikarnjana
    • 3
  • O. Kuha
    • 4
  • P. Chaikongthong
    • 5
  • T. Suwannagoot
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Outpatient and Family MedicinePhramongkutklao HospitalBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Institute of Geriatric MedicineMinistry of Public HealthNonthaburiThailand
  5. 5.Phramongkutklao Geriatric ClinicPhramongkutklao HospitalBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations