Advertisement

Diet as a Risk Factor for Cognitive Decline in African Americans and Caucasians with a Parental History of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study Dietary Patterns

  • A. C. Nutaitis
  • S. D. Tharwani
  • M. C. Serra
  • F. C. Goldstein
  • L. Zhao
  • S. S. Sher
  • D. D. Verble
  • Whitney WhartonEmail author
Open Access
Original Research

Abstract

Background

African Americans (AA) are more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease (AD) than Caucasians (CC). Dietary modification may have the potential to reduce the risk of developing AD.

Objective

The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between Southern and Prudent diet patterns and cognitive performance in individuals at risk for developing AD.

Design

Cross-sectional observational study.

Participants

Sixty-six cognitively normal AA and CC individuals aged 46–77 years with a parental history of AD were enrolled.

Measurements

Participants completed a Food Frequency questionnaire, cognitive function testing, which consisted of 8 neuropsychological tests, and cardiovascular risk factor assessments, including evaluation of microvascular and macrovascular function and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Results

Results revealed a relationship between the Southern diet and worse cognitive performance among AAs. AAs who consumed pies, mashed potatoes, tea, and sugar drinks showed worse cognitive performance (p<0.05) compared with CCs. In addition, gravy (p=0.06) and cooking oil/fat (p=0.06) showed negative trends with cognitive performance in AAs. In both CC and AA adults, greater adherence to a Prudent dietary pattern was associated with better cognitive outcomes. Cardiovascular results show that participants are overall healthy. AAs and CCs did not differ on any vascular measure including BP, arterial stiffness and endothelial function.

Conclusion

Research shows that dietary factors can associate with cognitive outcomes. This preliminary crosssectional study suggests that foods characteristic of the Southern and Prudent diets may have differential effects on cognitive function in middle-aged individuals at high risk for AD. Results suggest that diet could be a non-pharmaceutical tool to reduce cognitive decline in racially diverse populations. It is possible that the increased prevalence of AD in AA could be partially reduced via diet modification.

Key words

Alzheimer’s disease Diet African-American Prevention Nutrition Race Cognition Vascular 

Abbreviations

AA

African Americans

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

CCs

Caucasians

Introduction

Over five million people in the U.S. are living with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and in the next thirty years, the prevalence will increase to over sixteen million (1). Individuals at high risk of AD include African Americans (AAs), who have a 64% higher chance of developing AD than Caucasians (CCs) (2), and individuals with a parental history of AD, who are ten times more likely to become afflicted themselves (3). In the absence of a disease-modifying treatment, it is critical that we identify modifiable risk factors to promote cognitive health and reduce AD risk. Current preventative efforts focusing on lifestyle interventions including diet, exercise, and cognitive training (4, 5). Importantly, midlife (40-65 years of age) is when the neuropathological AD related changes begin and when the impact of vascular risk factors begin to have lasting effects. Thus, middle age is the optimal time to implement an AD focused lifestyle intervention.

Research suggests that adherence to a healthy diet confers cognitive benefits in older populations (6-8). Such diets include the Prudent, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and Mediterranean diets, characterized by fruit, vegetables, legumes, fish and olive oil. While these studies are encouraging, few studies have examined the potential influence of diet on cognition in middle-aged, ethnically diverse populations, who are at high risk for AD.

In addition to genetic contributions, the increased prevalence of AD in AAs may be a result of modifiable risk factors including dietary intake (9-12). In a study examining the association between the Mediterranean diet and cognitive decline, AA participants who had higher adherence with the Mediterranean diet had slower cognitive decline compared to participants with less Mediterranean diet adherence (13). Furthermore, current literature suggests that geographic and racial differences in cardiovascular disease risk are associated with the Southern dietary pattern (characterized by fried foods, fats, eggs, organ and processed meats and sugar-sweetened beverages) and thus it is possible that this Southern dietary pattern may contribute to cognitive decline (14). These findings stress the need for prospective studies addressing the relationships between diet and cognitive function in racially diverse populations in the U.S (15).

The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between dietary patterns, vascular function, and cognitive decline, in a middle aged, diverse cohort at high risk for AD due to a parental history of AD. We hypothesize that a higher intake of a Southern dietary pattern and lower intake of a Prudent (healthy) in dietary pattern increases the risk for vascular dysfunction and cognitive impairment, especially among AA, compared to CC, adults.

Subjects and Methods

Study Sample

Sixty-six subjects enrolled in an ongoing NIH/NIA funded study (ASCEND PI: Wharton) and with a parental history of AD took part in this cross-sectional pilot observational cohort study. Parental history was confirmed via autopsy or probable AD as defined by NINDS-ADRDA criteria and the Dementia Questionnaire (16). Subjects received vascular and cognitive assessments under the IRB approved protocol.

Demographic Information

Age, gender, level of education, income, exercise, smoking status, and depression was acquired via a selfreported survey. Exercise was reported as mean days per week of cardiovascular exercise (17).

Dietary Pattern Assessment: Diet was assessed via the Jackson Heart Study’s shortened version of the Lower Mississippi Delta Nutrition Intervention Research Initiative Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) (18). The questionnaire consists of 160 items and takes 20 minutes to complete. Participants self-reported quantity and frequency of food and drink consumption on an online survey at home via a secure, individual web link. Subjects were given a $15.00 gift card for completing the survey.

Food items from the FFQ were classified into the Southern or Prudent diets in accordance Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study guidelines (14). Food items including fried foods, fats, eggs, organ and processed meats and sugarsweetened beverages were classified as characteristic of the Southern diet (14). Healthy foods including fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and fish were classified as Prudent diet related items (19).

Cardiovascular Risk Factor Assessment

Vascular measures were selected based on prior research with vascular function in individuals at risk for AD (20, 21). Participants underwent a one-hour fasting assessment including microvascular vasodilatory function, using digital pulse amplitude tonometry (EndoPAT) and macrovascular vascular function (assessed by flow mediated vasodilation (FMD)). In addition, a blood pressure (BP) assessment was obtained via 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (Spacelabs Healthcare©). We examined 24-hour average systolic and diastolic blood pressure and nocturnal dipping patterns, all of which have been linked to cognition and AD (22).

Neuropsychological testing

Cognitive function was evaluated by a one-hour battery of eight neuropsychological tests in domains reportedly affected in early AD and susceptible to the effects of hypertension (23). The tests included: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), Benson visuospatial memory task, Buschke Delay Memory Test, Trails A and B, Digit Span Backwards, Mental Rotation Test (MRT), and Multilingual Naming Test (MINT). These tests targeted specific AD related cognitive domains including: working memory, executive function (Trail- Making Test B) (24, 25), language (MINT) (26), verbal memory (Buschke) (27), visuospatial ability (MRT) (28) and global cognition (MOCA) (29).

Data Analysis

Researchers utilized IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22 to test for group differences between AAs and CCs in demographics, vascular risk factors, and cognitive performance. We conducted independent two-sample t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for characteristic variables, controlling for age, gender and education. As there is not sufficient power to detect an interaction of diet and race, we examined the association between diet and cognition in each racial group separately. Correlations between cognitive performance and foods were assessed using Pearson’s r partial correlations controlling for education and age on the cognitive tests in which we found racial differences at p=0.10. Because eight cognitive tests were included in the analyses, the threshold of significance level using a false discovery rate approximation was adjusted such that a threshold p-value of 0.03 was used.

Results

Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics for 21 AAs and 45 CCs. Participants were middle aged (M=58.6 years), mostly female (67.6%), and highly educated (83.8% graduate or postgraduate education). While AAs and CCs did not differ on demographics including age, education, exercise, smoking status, or self-reported depression, significant racial differences were present for gender and income, such that a larger percent of AA females than CC females participated in the study, and AAs reported significantly less income compared to CCs. Participants were generally very healthy and AAs and CCs did not differ on any vascular measure including BP, arterial stiffness and endothelial function.
Table 1

Demographic Characteristics and Cardiovascular Data for African Americans and Caucasians. (AA= African American, CC=Caucasian)

Variable

AA (N=21)

CC (N=45)

Age (years)

57.8 ± 7.7

59.0 ± 5.8

Gender (% Female)

85.7% *

57.8% *

College graduate or higher level

85.7%

84.5%

Income**

  

Income $39,000 or less

38.1%

11.1%

Income $40,000-$79,000

38.1%

24.4%

Income $80,000 or more

23.8%

64.4%

Mean days/week performing cardiovascular exercise

1.5

1.7

Ever Smoker

19.0%

26.7%

Current Smoker

4.8%

8.9%

Depression

28.6%

17.7%

Systolic (mmHg)

129.8 ± 12.3

125.5 ± 12.8

Diastolic (mmHg)

77.0 ± 5.4

77.6 ± 9.7

% Nocturnal Dipping

6.5 ± 6.9

7.3 ± 6.3

FMD 60 s.

6.1 ± 6.1

5.9 ± 4.2

FMD 90 s.

4.3 ± 6.9

4.5 ± 3.8

EndoPat RHI

2.4 ± 0.8

2.3 ± 0.8

EndoPat AIx

28.8 ± 19.2

22.1 ± 17.4

*P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; RHI=reactive hyperemia index; AIx= augmentation index; FMD= flow mediated vasodilation

Table 2 shows cognitive test results by race. Results show that CCs significantly outperformed AAs on global cognition (MOCA), naming (MINT), and executive function (Trails B) tests (all p values <0.05). In addition, results revealed a trend for CCs to outperform AAs in verbal memory (Buschke Delay) (p= 0.073).

Table 3 shows Pearson’s r partial correlations between foods and cognitive performance, by race. Five of six southern foods show moderate to strong correlations with cognitive tests in AAs. In AAs, pies, mashed potatoes, and sugar drinks were correlated with cognitive performance (all p values <0.01) and trends were found with tea (p=0.04), gravy (p=0.06) and cooking oil/fat (p=0.06), such that AAs performed worse on cognitive tests with consumption of these foods. Results show that AAs were more negatively impacted than CCs by foods characteristic of the Southern diet. Conversely, CCs who consumed mashed potatoes (p=0.01) and sugar drinks (p<0.10) performed better on cognitive assessments. Foods characteristic of the Prudent diet, such as whole grain breads (p=0.04), baked fish (p=0.03), and grape juice (p<0.01), were positively associated with cognitive performance in CCs. In addition, 100% orange juice (OJ) showed a trend (p<0.10) of better performance on cognitive assessment in CC. The most pronounced relationship was seen with 100% grape juice, such that AAs consuming 100% grape juice performed significantly better on the MINT (p<0.01). Results suggest a stronger relationship between the Prudent diet and cognitive performance in CCs vs. AAs.
Table 2

Means and standard deviations on cognitive tests in African Americans and Caucasians. (AA=African American, CC=Caucasian)

 

AA (N=21)

CC (N=45)

MOCA

25.39 ± 2.40 *

27.0 ± 2.33*

Benson Delay

11.89 ± 3.35

10.78 ± 2.78

Buschke Delay

5.37 ± 3.33 †

6.88 ± 2.80 †

MINT

29.53 ± 2.09 *

30.7 ± 1.98*

MRT

17.37 ± 3.29

17.8 ± 5.50

Trails B

120.32 ± 102.45*

81.9 ± 42.56*

Backwards Digit Span

4.11 ± 1.20

4.78 ± 1.75

Backwards Digit Span Accuracy

5.47 ± 1.87

6.63 ± 2.94

†P < 0.1; * P < 0.05

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report a relationship between diet and cognitive performance in healthy, racially diverse middle-aged adults with a parental history of AD. CCs outperformed AAs on cognitive tests of global cognition, language, and executive function. Racial differences on cognitive tests could not be explained by age, education, vascular risk factors, exercise, smoking, or depression. However, our results suggest that these differences may be partially attributed to dietary patterns specific to the Southern and Prudent diets.

A positive relationship between cognition and the Prudent (healthy) diet and a negative relationship between cognition and the Southern (less healthy) diet was observed. Similarly, Shakersain et al. recently identified a relationship between lower adherence to a Prudent diet and greater rates of cognitive decline [6]. Further, Seetharaman et al. reported that elevated diabetes risk, which is higher in AAs than CCs, is related to poorer performance on perceptual speed, verbal ability, spatial ability, and overall cognition (30). Foods in our study characteristic of the Southern diet, such as pies, tea, and sugar drinks, were negatively associated with cognitive performance and thus it is possible that this may be a result of the higher glycemic index of these foods. Our results also align with studies showing that a diet high in gravy or butter is associated with poor cognition in older adults (31). Further, we show that racial differences in diet such that AAs reported stronger alliance with the Southern diet than CCs. This finding is not unique to our study, as previous studies show that AAs are less likely to adhere to the DASH diet compared with CCs (32). Our study highlights the need for culturally sensitive dietary interventions to combat cognitive decline in high-risk populations.
Table 3

Pearson’s r correlations between cognition and foods by race for individuals who completed Food Frequency Questionnaire. (AA= African American, CC=Caucasian; 1-6=Southern Diet, 7-10=Prudent Diet)

 

MOCA

Busche Delay

MINT

Trails B

1. Pies

    

AA

-0.904**

0.534

-0.295

-0.431

CC

-0.082

-0.144

0.224

0.192

2. Gravy

    

AA

-0.056

-0.483

-0.791†

0.047

CC

0.085

-0.298

0.157

-0.111

3. Mash Potatoes

    

AA

0.693

-0.662

0.417

0.889**

CC

0.100

-0.128

0.441**

-0.034

4. Added Fat/oil while cooking

    

AA

0.096

-0.733†

0.112

0.551

CC

0.089

0.092

0.062

0.057

5. Tea

    

AA

-0.772*

-0.045

-0.686

0.179

CC

0.189

0.129

0.128

-0.160

6. Sugar Drinks

    

AA

0.529

-0.890**

0.419

0.664

CC

0.369*

0.307†

0.308†

-0.299

8. Baked Fish

    

AA

-0.520

0.442

-0.514

-0.023

CC

-0.155

-0.075

0.388*

0.071

9. 100% Grape Juice

    

AA

0.098

0.201

0.977**

0.145

CC

-0.057

-0.198

0.162

-0.264

10. 100% Orange Juice

    

AA

0.264

0.239

0.054

0.192

CC

0.023

0.332†

0.032

-0.211

†P<0.1; * P<0.05; **P<0.01

Only one Prudent item (100% grape juice) was correlated to cognitive performance in AAs, in contrast to five Prudent items (whole grain breads, mashed potatoes, baked fish, 100% grape juice and 100% OJ). The Prudent diet is nutrient dense, containing numerous nutrients with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, including fiber, poly-unsaturated fatty acids, vitamins, minerals, carotenoids, and polyphenols, among others (6). Therefore, it is possible that the negative effects of elevated inflammation and oxidative stress, which is more prevalent among AAs, on cognitive health may be dampened by the effects of the Prudent diet (34, 35). The association between beverages and cognitive performance should also be noted. Individuals may be more consistent with their beverage choices, (i.e. coffee or OJ), than food choices, and thus beverages may associate more strongly with cognitive function due to a higher intake.

The need for advancements in preventative and treatment strategies in high-risk groups, including AAs is great (36). Results showed racial differences in the relationship between diet and cognitive performance. It is possible that dietary intake may be contributing to early cognitive decline in AAs, or preservation of cognitive functioning in CCs. This finding is important, as the current literature suggests that even though latelife positive dietary patterns may result in notable health improvements (19, 37), mid-life is the optimal time to incorporate these changes, before the irreversible AD cascade begins (38). Thus diet modification may hold promise as a modifiable risk factor for AD.

Strengths of this study include a comprehensive battery of neuropsychology testing and vascular measures k]and a middle aged k]racially diverse cohort at high risk for AD. Also the FFQ is both racially and geographically sensitive (18). Limitations of this pilot project include the small sample size and the overall health of the cohort. It is possible that diet may have a more pronounced impact in individuals with preexisting health complications. Next the FFQ does not include information regarding longitudinal food choices k]and these data should be collected in future studies (39).

In summary, our results stress the need for further research investigating the potential of dietary intake as a non-pharmaceutical intervention in individuals at risk for AD. Because AAs have an increased incidence and prevalence of AD (2, 40), investigation of modifiable risk factors that target this high-risk group is essential. Specifically, nutritional education and dietary interventions designed to shift individuals, particularly AAs, from Southern diets to healthier, Prudent – like diets, may be a cost efficient way to preserve cognitive function in otherwise healthy individuals.

Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and in part by the Scholarly Independent Research at Emory (SIRE) Research grant for undergraduate students. The NIH and SIRE had no role in study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Acknowledgments: All persons who have made substantial contributions to this manuscript are listed as authors. Their contributions are listed below: Alexandra C. Nutaitis, BS: Designed research, Conducted research, Analyzed data, Wrote paper, Had primary responsibility for final content . Sonum D. Tharwani: Conducted research, Wrote paper. Monica C. Serra, PhD: Provided essential reagents or materials, Analyzed data, Wrote paper. Felicia C. Goldstein, PhD: Designed research, Wrote paper. Liping Zhao, MSPH: Provided essential reagents or materials, Analyzed data, Wrote paper

Salman S. Sher, MD: Conducted research, Provided essential reagents or materials, Analyzed data, Wrote paper

Danielle D. Verble, MA: Conducted research, Wrote paper

Whitney Wharton, PhD: Designed research, Conducted research, Analyzed data, Wrote paper Had primary responsibility for final content

Sources of Support: NIH-NIA under grants: NIH-NIA 5 P50 AG025688, K01AG042498, and U01 AG016976. Independent funding for the present pilot study was obtained through Emory University’s Scholarly Inquiry Research Grant for undergraduate students (PI: Nutaitis).

Conflict of interest: No author has a conflict of interest to report.

References

  1. 1.
    Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures [cited 2016; Available from: https://doi.org/www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/facts-figures.
  2. 2.
    Steenland, K., et al. A Meta-Analysis of Alzheimer’s Disease Incidence and Prevalence Comparing African-Americans and Caucasians. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 50(1):71–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alzheimer’s Association. African-Americans and Alzheimer’s 2016 [cited 2016; Available from: https://doi.org/www.alz.org/africanamerican/.
  4. 4.
    Rege, S.D., et al. Can Diet and Physical Activity Limit Alzheimer&#39;s Disease Risk? Curr Alzheimer Res 2017; 14(1):76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baumgart, M., et al. Summary of the evidence on modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia: A population-based perspective. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11(6):718–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shakersain, B., et al. The Nordic Prudent Diet Reduces Risk of Cognitive Decline in the Swedish Older Adults: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Nutrients 2018; 10(2).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tangney, C.C., et al. Relation of DASH-and Mediterranean-like dietary patterns to cognitive decline in older persons. Neurology 2014; 83(16):1410–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van de Rest, O., et al. Dietary patterns, cognitive decline, and dementia: a systematic review. Adv Nutr 2015; 6(2):154–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chin, A.L., S. Negash, and R. Hamilton. Diversity and disparity in dementia: the impact of ethnoracial differences in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2011; 25(3):187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norton, S., et al. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13(8):788–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Biessels, G.J. Capitalising on modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13(8):752–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sofi, F., et al. Accruing evidence on benefits of adherence to the Mediterranean diet on health: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 92(5):1189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koyama, A., et al. Association between the Mediterranean diet and cognitive decline in a biracial population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2015; 70(3):354–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shikany, J.M., et al. Southern Dietary Pattern is Associated With Hazard of Acute Coronary Heart Disease in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study. Circulation 2015; 132(9):804–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harmon, B.E., et al. Associations of key diet-quality indexes with mortality in the Multiethnic Cohort: the Dietary Patterns Methods Project. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 101(3):587–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kawas, C., et al. A validation study of the Dementia Questionnaire. Arch Neurol 1994; 51(9):901–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobs, D.R., Jr., et al. Validity and Reliability of Short Physical Activity History: Cardia and the Minnesota Heart Health Program. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 1989; 9(11):448–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carithers, T.C., et al. Validity and calibration of food frequency questionnaires used with African-American adults in the Jackson Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109(7):1184–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shakersain, B., et al. Prudent diet may attenuate the adverse effects of Western diet on cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement 2016; 12(2):100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhong, W., et al. Pulse wave velocity and cognitive function in older adults. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2014; 28(1):44–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hajjar, I., et al. Roles of Arterial Stiffness and Blood Pressure in Hypertension-Associated Cognitive Decline in Healthy Adults. Hypertension 2016; 67(1):171–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tarumi, T., et al. Amyloid burden and sleep blood pressure in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2015; 85(22):1922–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Asthana, S., et al. Cognitive and neuroendocrine response to transdermal estrogen in postmenopausal women with Alzheimer’s disease: results of a placebo-controlled, double-blind, pilot study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1999; 24(6):657–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dodrill, C.B. A neuropsychological battery for epilepsy. Epilepsia 1978; 19(6):611–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stroop, J. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 1935; 18:643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spreen, O. and E. Strauss, A compendium of neuropsychological tests. 2nd ed. 1998, New York, New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buschke, H. Selective reminding for analysis of memory and learning. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 1973; 12:543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vandenberg, S.G. and A.R. Kuse. Mental rotations, a group test of threedimensional spatial visualization. Percept Mot Skills 1978; 47(2):599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nasreddine, Z.S., et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53(4):695–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Seetharaman, S., et al. Blood glucose, diet-based glycemic load and cognitive aging among dementia-free older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2015; 70(4):471–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Granic, A., et al. Dietary Patterns High in Red Meat, Potato, Gravy, and Butter Are Associated with Poor Cognitive Functioning but Not with Rate of Cognitive Decline in Very Old Adults. J Nutr 2016; 146(2):265–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Epstein, D.E., et al. Determinants and consequences of adherence to the dietary approaches to stop hypertension diet in African-American and white adults with high blood pressure: results from the ENCORE trial. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 112(11):1763–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Feairheller, D.L., et al. Racial differences in oxidative stress and inflammation: in vitro and in vivo. Clin Transl Sci 2011; 4(1):32–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Morris, A.A., et al. Differences in systemic oxidative stress based on race and the metabolic syndrome: the Morehouse and Emory Team up to Eliminate Health Disparities (META-Health) study. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2012; 10(4):252–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Froehlich, T.E., S.T. Bogardus, Jr., and S.K. Inouye. Dementia and race: are there differences between African Americans and Caucasians? J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49(4):477–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bardach, S.H., N.E. Schoenberg, and B.M. Howell. What Motivates Older Adults to Improve Diet and Exercise Patterns? J Community Health 2016; 41(1):22–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Barage, S.H. and K.D. Sonawane. Amyloid cascade hypothesis: Pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropeptides 2015; 52:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Montero, P., et al. Lifetime dietary change and its relation to increase in weight in Spanish women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24(1):14–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dilworth-Anderson, P., et al. Diagnosis and assessment of Alzheimer’s disease in diverse populations. Alzheimers Dement 2008; 4(4):305–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Nutaitis
    • 1
  • S. D. Tharwani
    • 1
  • M. C. Serra
    • 2
  • F. C. Goldstein
    • 1
  • L. Zhao
    • 3
  • S. S. Sher
    • 4
  • D. D. Verble
    • 1
  • Whitney Wharton
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Emory University, Department of NeurologyAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Atlanta VA Medical Center & Emory University Department of MedicineAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Emory University, Department of Biostatistics and BioinformaticsAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Emory University, Department of Internal MedicineAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations