EU Enlargement to Turkey: Potential Effects on Turkey’s Agricultural Income and Markets
- 50 Downloads
Turkey is officially recognized as a candidate country for EU membership and formal accession negotiations started in October 2005. Given the importance of Turkey’s agricultural sector, a Turkish accession to the EU could be expected to impact the agricultural markets in both the EU and Turkey. This paper provides an in-depth model-based quantitative assessment of the potential impacts of a Turkish EU-membership for agricultural income and commodity markets, focusing in particular on the effects in Turkey. Results show that the main impacts on Turkish agriculture would be a reduction in subsidies, producer prices, and quantities produced. A decrease in agricultural income, especially for Turkish crop producers (except for tobacco farmers), is also projected. In contrast, producers of sheep meat, broilers and dairy milk would benefit from EU accession due to lower feed costs. Moreover, the demand levels of most commodities are projected to increase due to lower prices, thus Turkish consumers are expected to gain from an accession to the EU.
KeywordsTurkey EU Enlargement Agricultural Markets
JEL ClassificationQ11 Q13 C45
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Burrell, A. and Oskam, A.J., 2005. Turkey in the European Union: implications for agriculture, food and structural policy. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
- Burrell, A. and Kurzweil, M., 2007. Distortions to agricultural incentives in Turkey. Agricultural Distortions Working Paper, 10. World Bank.Google Scholar
- Chantreuil F. and Le Barbenchon, M.D., 2007. AGMEMOD Database Documentation. AGMEMOD Deliverable 3.Google Scholar
- Chantreuil, F., Hanrahan, K., and van Leeuwen, M. (Eds.), 2011. The Future of EU Agricultural Markets by AGMEMOD. The Netherlands: SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Dellal, I., 2009. The Role of Small Farms in Turkey. 111th EAAE — IAAE Seminar, Small farms: Decline or persistence, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
- Esposti, R. and Camaioni, B., 2007. Technical report on the modeling structure. AGMEMOD WP2 D2. Project no. SSPE-CT-2005-021543. European Commission, 2010. Turkey 2010 Progress Report (accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, enlargement strategy and main challenges 2010–2011). Commission Staff Working Document, COM(2010) 660.Google Scholar
- European Commission, 2011. “Health Check” of the Common Agricultural Policy. [online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/healthcheck/index_en.htm [Accessed 20 November 2011].
- Eurostat, 2010. Statistical database agriculture. [online] Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database [Accessed 10 December 2010].
- FAPRI (Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute), 2010. FAPRI 2010 U.S. and World Agricultural Outlook. [online] Available at: http://www.fapri.iastate.edu/outlook/2010/ [Accessed 20 November 2011].
- Grethe, H., 2004. Effects of including agricultural products in the customs union between Turkey and the EU. A partial equilibrium analysis for Turkey. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Harrison, G.W., Rutherford, T.F., and Tarr, D.G., 1996. Economic implications for Turkey of a customs union with the European Union. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1599.Google Scholar
- Leeuwen, M. van, Tabeau, A., Dol, W., and Bouma, F., 2008. Technical report on the combined model. AGMEMOD Deliverable 8.Google Scholar
- Leeuwen, M. van, Salamon, P., Fellmann, T., Koç, A., Boluk, G., Tabeau, A., Esposti, R. Bonfiglio, A., Lobianco, A., and Hanrahan, K., 2011. Potential impacts on agricultural commodity markets of an EU enlargement to Turkey. Extension of the AGMEMOD model towards Turkey and accession scenario. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- OECD, 2010. Agricultural policies in OECD Countries. At a glance. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- OECD, 2011. Evaluation of agricultural policy reforms in Turkey. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Pelikan, J., Brockmeier, M., Kleinhanß, W., Tietz, A., Weingarten, P., and Bayaner, A., 2009. Auswirkungen eines EU-Beitritts der Türkei. [Impacts of a Turkish EU accession] Sonderheft 329, Braunschweig: Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI).Google Scholar
- Salamon, P., Chantreuil, F., Donnellan, T., Erjavec, E., Esposti, R., Hanrahan, K., Leeuwen, M. van, Bouma, F., Dol, W., and Salputra, G., 2008. How to deal with the challenges of linking a large number of individual national models: The case of the AGMEMOD Partnership. Agrarwirtschaft, 57(8), pp.373–378.Google Scholar
- Selli, F., Eraslan, H., Chowdhury, D., and Sukumar, A., 2010. International competitiveness: Analysis of Turkish animal husbandry: An empirical study in GAP Region. Enterprise Risk Management, 1(1), pp.100–114.Google Scholar
- State Planning Office (SPO), 2010. 2010 Annual Programme, Ninth Development Plan (2007–2013). Ankara: Undersecretariat of State Planning Office.Google Scholar
- Turkish Statistical Institute, 2009a. Agricultural Structure: Production, Price and Value. Ankara: Printing Division.Google Scholar
- Turkish Statistical Institute, 2009b. Address Based Population Registration System; Population Census 2008. Ankara: Printing Division.Google Scholar