Long-term biocompatibility of NanoGATE drug delivery implant
The fouling of components and the formation of a fibrotic tissue capsule around subcutaneously implanted medical devices are two major obstacles in developing viable, long-term implantable drug delivery systems. NanoGATE is a subcutaneous implant designed for constant-output passive diffusion of a drug of interest through a silicon nanopore membrane. To this end, we have investigated the long-term in vivo biocompatibility of the NanoGATE implant in terms of the fouling of the nanopore membrane and the formation of a fibrotic tissue capsule around the implant. We have also evaluated how these effects influence diffusion of a lysozyme surrogate from the device once implanted within the vascular compartment of a Sprague-Dawley rat model. Using several model biomolecules such as glucose, lysozyme, and albumin, our studies suggest that silicon nanopore membranes do not foul when implanted subcutaneously for 6 mo. This study also reveals the tissue capsule that naturally forms around the implant does not limit diffusion of molecules with molecular weights on the order of 14.4 kDa at therapeutic delivery rates of tens of micrograms per day. This indicates that our NanoGATE implant should be completely functional in vivo, providing constant release levels of a drug over an extended time period. Thus, by adjusting the release rate to fit the pharmacokinetic clearance profile of the Sprague-Dawley rat, long-term steady-state blood plasma concentrations can be achieved.
Key WordsSilicon nanopore membrane NanoGATE biocompatibility drug delivery implant
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Anderson, J. (1994) In: Problems in General Surgery. Klitzman B. (ed.). J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
- 3.Ratner, B. D., Hoffman, A. S., Schoen, F. J., and Lemons, J. E. (eds.), (1996), Biomaterials Science. An introduction to Materials in Medicine. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
- 10.Siebers, U., Sturm, R., Renardy, M., et al. (1990), In: Methods in Islet Transplantation, Federlin, K., Bretzel, R. G., and Hering, B. J., (eds.). Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, pp. 206–208.Google Scholar
- 11.Wake, M. C., Patrick, C. W., and Mikos, A. G. (1994), Cell Transplant. 3, 339–343.Google Scholar
- 12.Desai, T. A., Popat K. C., and Sharma, S. (2002), In: Business Briefing: Medical Device Manufacturing and Technology. World Markets Research Center, London, pp. 80–82.Google Scholar
- 15.Moussy, F., Harrison, D. J., and Rajotte, R. V. (1994), Int. J. Artif. Organ 17, 95–101.Google Scholar
- 18.Desai, T. A., Ferrari, M., and Mazzoni, G. (1995), Materials and Design Technology, Kozik, T. (ed.) ASME, New York, pp. 97–103.Google Scholar