Medical Oncology

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 203–209 | Cite as

Vertebroplasty for metastasis

Review Article

Abstract

Vertebral metastases are frequently asymptomatic; however, the occurrence of a pathological (micro-)fracture may be associated with unremitting pain, instability, and even kyphoscoliotic deformity and require prompt and effective treatment. In symptomatic patients, the beneficial effect of conservative therapies requires too much time. Vertebroplasty (VP) may be an additional or even alternative local treatment modality for such patients. Currently, up to 80% of VP patients report important relief of metastasis-related pain. Ongoing deformity of the vertebral body is avoided. Morbidity rates are very low and the complication rates are markedly below 10%. Fatalities, if any, are almost always the result of cancer comorbidity rather than related to the VP procedure itself. The patient’s mobility is often improved, thus avoiding much of the comorbidity of prolonged conservative treatment and bed rest. VP can successfully be combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, neurodecompression, and instrumentation.

Even though VP is no panacea, it may be helpful to selected patients and instantly improve quality of life. Currently, VP has a solid basis for the palliative treatment of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral metastasis.

Key Words

Spine vertebral metastasis vertebroplasty spine surgery 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Harrington, K.D. (1986). Metastatic disease of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 68:1110–1115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deramond, H., Depriester, C. and Toussaint, P. (1996). Vertébroplastie et radiologie interventionnelle percutanée dans les métastases osseuses: technique, indications, contre-indications. Bull Cancer Radiother. 83:277–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weill, A., et al. (1996). Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology 199:241–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cotten, A., et al. (1996). Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesions filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 200:525–530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schaberg, J. and Gainor, B.J. (1985). A profile of metastatic carcinoma of the spine. Spine 10:19–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jenis, L.G., Dunn, E.J. and An, H.S. (1999). Metastatic disease of the cervical spine. Clin. Orthop. 359:89–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cotten, A., et al. (1998). Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. Radiographics 18:311–323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deramond, H., Depriester, C., Galibert, P. and Le Gars, D. (1998). Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Technique, indications, and results. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 36:533–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murphy, K.J. and Deramond, H. (2000). Percutaneous vertebroplasty in benign and malignant disease. Neuroimaging Clin. North Am. 10:535–545.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaemmerlen, P., et al. (1989). Vertébroplastie percutanée dans le traitement des métastases. Technique et résultats. J. Radiol. 70:557–562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cortet, B., et al. (1997). Intérêt de la vertébroplastie dans le traitement des métastases ostéolytiques et du myélome. Rev. Rhum. Ed. Fr. 64:189–195.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chiras, J., et al. (1995). Vertébroplasties percutanées. Rev. Med. Interne 16:854–859.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galibert, P., Deramond, H., Rosat, P. and Le Gars, D. (1987). Note préliminaire sur le traitement des angiomes vertébraux par vertébroplastie acrylique percutanée. Neurochirurgie 33:66–68.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galibert, P. and Deramond, H. (1990). La vertébroplastie acrylique percutanée comme traitement des angiomes vertébraux et des affections dolorigènes et fragilisantes du rachis. Chirurgie 116:326–335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bascoulergue, Y., Duquesnel, J., Leclercq, R., Mottolese, C. and Lapras, C. (1988). Percutaneous injection of methyl methacrylate in the vertebral body for the treatment of various diseases: percutaneous vertebroplasty. Radiology 169(P):372 (abstract).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deramond, H., Debussche, C., Pruvo, J.P. and Galibert, P. (1990). La vertébroplastie. Feuillets Radiol 30:262–268.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levine, S.A., Perin, L.A., Hayes, D. and Hayes, W.S. (2000). An evidence-based evaluation of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Manag. Care 9:56–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wenger, M. and Markwalder, T.M. (1999). Surgically controlled, transpedicular methyl methacrylate vertebroplasty with fluoroscopic guidance. Acta Neurochir. 141:625–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wenger, M. and Markwalder, T.M. (2000). Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. (letter). Spine 25:2968–2969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wenger, M., Braun, M. and Markwalder, T.M. (2002). Vertébroplastie et kyphoplastie: une revue. Rev. Med. Suisse Romande 122:557–560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Do, H.M. (2000). Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients for percutaneous vertebroplasty. Topics Magn. Reson. Imaging 11:235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Minart, D., Vallée, J.N., Cormier, E. and Chiras, J. (2001). Percutaneous coaxial transpedicular biopsy of vertebral body lesions during vertebroplasty. Neuroadiology 43:409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Boriani, S., et al. (1996). En bloc resection of bone tumors of the thoracolumbar spine. A preliminary report on 29 patients. Spine 21:1927–1931.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abe, E., et al. (2001). Total spondylectomy for primary malignant, aggressive benign, and solitary metastatic bone tumors of the thoracolumbar spine. J. Spinal Disord. 3:237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chiras, J., Depriester, C., Weill, A., Sola-Martinez, M.T. and Deramond, H. (1997). Vertébroplasties percutanées. Technique et indications. J. Neuroradiol 24:45–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dufresne, A.C., Brunet, E., Sola-Martinez, M.T., Rose, M. and Chiras, J. (1998). Vertébroplastie percutanée de la charnière cervico-dorsale par voie antérieure. Technique et résultats. A propos de neuf cas. J. Neuroradiol. 25:123–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tong, F.C., Cloft, H.J., Joseph, G.J., Rodts, G.R. and Dion, J.E. (2000). Transoral approach to cervical vertebroplasty for multiple myeloma. Am. J. Roentgenol. 175:1322–1324.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wetzel, S.G., Martin, J.B., Somon, T., Wilhelm, K. and Rüfenacht, D.A. (2002). Painful osteolytic metastasis of the atlas: treatment with percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine 27:E493-E495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martin, J.B., et al. (1999). Vertebroplasty: clinical experience and follow-up results. Bone 25:11S-15S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Murray, J.A., Bruels, M.C. and Lindberg, R.D. (1974). Irradiation of polymethylmethacrylate. In vitro gamma radiation effect. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 56:311–312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gangi, A., et al. (1998). CT-guided interventional procedures for pain management in the lumbosacral spine. Radiographics 18:621–633.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hierholzer, J., et al. (2002). Perkutane Vertebroplastie. Fortschr. Röntgenstr. 174:328–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fourney, D.R., et al. (2003). Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J. Neurosurg. (Spine 1) 98:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liebschner, M.A., Rosenberg, W.S. and Keaveny, T.M. (2001). Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty. Spine 26:1547–1554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Batson, O.V. (1940). The function of vertebral veins and their role in the spread of metastases. Arch. Surg. 112:138–149.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chiras, J. and Deramond, H. (1995). Complications des vertébroplasties, in Echecs et complications de la chirurgie du rachis. Chirurgie de reprise. (Saillant, G. and Laville, C., eds.), pp149–153. Sauramps médical, Paris.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Harrington, K.D. (2001). Major neurologic complications following percutaneous vertebroplasty with PMMA: a case report. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 83:1070–1073.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lee, B.J., Lee, S.R. and Yoo, T.Y. (2002). Paraplegia as a complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. A case report. Spine 27:E419-E422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ratliff, J., Nguyen, T. and Heiss, J. (2001). Root and spinal cord compression from methylmethacrylate vertebroplasty. Spine 26:E300-E302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    San Millán Ruíz, D., et al. (1999). Pathology findings with acrylic implants. Bone 25:85S-90S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Deramond, H., Wright, N.T. and Belkoff, S.M. (1999). Temperature elevation caused by bone cement polymerization during vertebroplasty. Bone 25:17S-21S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Padovani, B., Kasriel, O., Brunner, P. and Peretti-Viton, P. (1999). Pulmonary embolism caused by acrylic cement: a rare complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 20:375–377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jang, J.S., Lee, S.H. and Jung, S.K. (2002). Pulmonary embolisma of polymethylmethacrylate after percutaneous vertebroplasty. A report of three cases. Spine 27:E416-E418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bernhard, J., Heini, P.F. and Villiger, P.M. (2003). Asymptomatic diffuse pulmonary embolism caused by acrylic cement: an unusual complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 62:85–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chen, H.L. (2002). A lethal pulmonary embolism during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Anesth. Analg. 95:1060–1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tozzi, P., et al. (2002). Management of pulmonary embolism during acrylic vertebroplasty. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 74:1706–1708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cunin, G., Boissonnet, H., Petite, H., Blanchat, C. and Guillemin, G. (2000). Experimental vertebroplasty using osteoconductive granular material. Spine 25:1070–1076.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Heini, P.F. and Berlemann, U. (2001). Bone substitutes in vertebroplasty. Eur. Spine J. 10:S205-S213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ludwig, S.C. and Boden, S.D. (2000). Osteoinductive bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion. A basic science summary. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 30:635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang, H.M., et al. (1995). Methotrexate loaded acrylic cement in the management of skeletal metastases. Biomechanical, biological, and systemic effect. Clin. Orthop. 312:173–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vasconcelos, C., Gailloud, P., Martin, J.B. and Murphy, K.J. (2001). Transient arterial hypotension induced by PMMA injection during percutaneous vertebroplasty. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 12:1001–1002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Aebli, N., et al. (2002). Fat embolism and acute hypotension during vertebroplasty. An experimental study in sheep. Spine 27:460–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kaufmann, T.J., et al. (2002). Cardiovascular effects of polymethylmethacrylate use in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 23:601–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Liebermann, I.C.H., et al. (2001). Initial outcomes and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 26:1631–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NeurosurgeryThe Hirslanden GroupBern 25Switzerland

Personalised recommendations