, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 147–155 | Cite as

Apoptosis induced by antigestagen RU486 in rat corpus luteum of pregnancy

  • Carlos M. Telleria
  • Alicia A. Goyeneche
  • Juan C. Cavicchia
  • Arturo O. Stati
  • Ricardo P. Deis


Administration of RU486 to late pregnant rats results in preterm delivery 24 h after treatment and the induction of a luteolytic process after labor. We investigated whether functional changes occurring within the corpora lutea after RU486 treatment were associated with morphologic features of apoptotic cell death. Rats on d 18 of pregnancy were treated with RU486 (5 mg/kg) at 10:00 am and killed 72 h after. We studied the number of apoptotic cells in paraffin sections of the corpora lutea by routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, and by in situ 3′ end labeling (TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling [TUNEL]). The corpora lutea were also processed for electron microscopy to study ultrastructural changes after RU486 treatment. The number of cells showing apoptotic nuclei in H&E-stained sections was higher in RU486-treated animals than in controls (vehicle-treated rats). The quantification of the number of apoptotic nuclei within the corpora lutea performed by TUNEL confirmed the higher number of apoptotic nuclei in animals receiving the antigestagen compared with controls. Ultrastructurally, the luteal cells undergoing a poptosis presented a highly deteriorated cytoplasmic organization The nuclei, in an initial step of regression, displayed condensation of the chromatin, a prominent nucleolus, and a perinuclear space. In an advanced step of degeneration, the nuclei showed evidence of large irregular aggregates of condensed chromatin. Prostaglandin F(PGF), which mediates the luteolytic action of RU486, mimicked the effect of the antigestagen on the induction of apoptosis when administered to rats on d 18 of pregnancy (100 μg at 9:00 am and 1:00 pm), which were killed 72 after the last injection. In conclusion, the present results indicate that functional luteolysis in rats is associated with structural luteal regression with the morphologic features of apoptotic cell death, as demonstrated by studying the luteolytic process induced by the administration of the antigestagen RU486.

Key Words

Corpus luteum luteolysis apoptosis RU486 rat 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Albarracin, C. T., Parmer, T. G., Duan, W. R., Nelson, S. E., and Gibori, G. (1994). Endocrinology 134, 2453–2460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wiest, W. G. and Forbers, T. R. (1964). Endocrinology 74, 149–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bast, J. D. and Melampy, R. M. (1972). Endocrinology 91, 1499–1505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Telleria, C. M., Stocco, C. O., and Deis, R. P. (1995). J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 52, 567–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Telleria, C. M., Stocco, C. O., Stati, A. O., Rastrilla, A. M., Carrizo, D. G., Aguado, L. I., and Deis, R. P. (1995). J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 55, 385–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Philibert, D., Moguilewski, M., Mary, I., Lecaque, D., Tournemine, C., Secchi, J., and Deraedt, R. (1985). In: The antiprogesterone steroid RU486 and human fertility control. Baulieu, E. E. and Segal, S. J. (eds.), Plenum: New York.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bose, M. J., Germain, G., Nicolle, A., Mouren, M., Philiber, D., and Baulieu, E. E. (1987). J. Reprod. Fertil. 79, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garfield, R. E., Gasc, J. M., and Baulieu, E. E. (1987). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 157, 1281–1285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwartzman, R. A., and Cidlowski, J. A. (1993). Endocr. Rev. 14, 133–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steller, H. (1995). Science 267, 1445–1449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vaux, D. L. and Strasser, A. (1996). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 2239–2244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amsterdam, A., Dantes, A., Selvaraj, N., and Aharoni, D. (1997). Steroids 62, 207–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicosia, S. V., Diaz, J., Nicosia, R. F., Saunders, B. O., and Muro-Cacho, C. (1995). Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 25, 143–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Young, F. M., Illingworth, P. J., Lunn, S. F., Harrison, D. J., and Fraser, H. M. (1997). J. Reprod. Fertil. 111, 109–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shikone, T., Yamoto, M., Kokawa, K., Yamashita, K., Nishimori, K., and Nakano, R. (1996). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 81, 2376–2380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Juengel, J. L., Garverick, H. A., Johnson, A. L., Youngquist, R. S., and Smith, M. F. (1993). Endocrinology 132, 249–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rueda, B. R., Wegner, J. A., Marion, S. L., Wahlen, D. D., and Hoyer, P. B. (1995). Biol. Reprod. 52, 305–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsuyama, S., Chang K.-T., Kanuka, H., Ohnishi, M., Ikeda, A., Nishihara, M., and Takahashi, M. (1996). Biol. Reprod. 54, 1245–1251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boone, D. L., and Tsang, B. K. (1998). Biol. Reprod. 58, 1533–1539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guo, K., Wolf, V., Dharmarajan, A. M., Feng, Z., Bielke, W., Saurer, S., and Friis, R. (1998). Biol. Reprod. 58, 739–746.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vermouth, N. T., and Deis, R. P. (1975). J. Endocrinol. 66, 21–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cabrol, D., Carbonne, B., Bienkiewicz, A., Dallot, E., Alj, A. E., and Cedard, L. (1991). Prostaglandins 42, 71–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goyeneche, A. A., Telleria, C. M., Gelardi, N. E., and Deis, R. P. (2000). Biol. Reprod. 62(Suppl. 1):214 (abstract 271).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Telleria, C. M., Parmer, T. G., Zhong, L., Clarke, D. L., Albarracin, C. T., Duan, W. R., Linzer D. I. H., and Gibori, G. (1997). Endocrinology 138, 1499–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aharoni, D., Dantes, A., Oren, M., and Amsterdam, A. (1995). Exp. Cell. Res. 218, 271–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Keren-Tal, I., Suh, B.-S., Dantes, A., Lindner, S., Oren, M., and Amsterdam, A. (1995). Exp. Cell. Res. 218, 283–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bussmann, L. E. (1989). J. Reprod. Fertil. 85, 331–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park-Sarge, O.-K., Parmer, T. G., Gu, Y., and Gibori, G. (1995). Endocrinology 136, 1537–1543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Telleria, C. M., Stocco, C. O., Stati, A. O., and Deis, R. P. (1999). Steroids 64, 760–766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Behrman, H. R., Endo, T., Aten, R. F., and Musicki, B. (1993). Reprod. Med. Rev. 2, 153–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Michael, A. E., Abayasekara, D. R. E., and Webley, G. E. (1994). Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 99, R1-R9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gibori, G. (1993). In: The ovary. Adashi, E. Y. and Leung, P. C. K. (eds.), Raven: New York.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Deis, R. P. (1971). Nature 229, 568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Okamura, H., Yang, S.-L., Wright, K. H., and Wallach, E. E. (1972). Fertil. Steril. 23, 475–483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stocco, C. O., and Deis, R. P. (1996). J. Endocrinol. 150, 423–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Singh, G., Singh, M. M., Maitra, S. C., Elger, W., Kalra, V., Upadhyay, S. N., Chowdhury, S. R., and Kamboj, V. P. (1988). J. Reprod. Fertil. 83, 73–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kawano, T., Okamura, H., Tajima, C., Fukuma, K., and Katabuchi, H. (1988). J. Reprod. Fertil. 83, 279–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rotello, R., Lieberman, R., Lepoff, R., and Gerschenson, L. (1992). Am. J. Pathol. 140, 449–456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Feng, Z., Marti, A., Jehn, B., Altermatt, H. J., Chicaiza, G., and Jaggi, R. (1995). J. Cell. Biol. 131, 1095–1103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sugino, N., Telleria, C. M., and Gibori, G. (1997). Endocrinology 138, 4497–4500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Telleria, C. M., Ou, J., Sugino, N., Ferguson, S., and Gibori, G. (1998). Endocrinology 139, 3597–3605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kuranaga, E., Kanuka, H., Hirabayashi, K., Suzuki, M., Nishihara, M., and Takahashi, M. (2000). FEBS Lett. 466, 279–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gaytán, F., Bellido, C., Morales, C., and Sánchez-Criado, J. E. (1998). Biol. Reprod. 59, 1200–1206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gibori, G., Khan, I., Warshaw, M. L., McLean, M. P., Puryear, T. K., Nelson, S., Durkee, T. J., Azhar, S., Steinschneider, A., and Rao, M. C. (1988). Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 44, 377–429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Van der Schepop, H. A. M., de Jong, J. S., van Diest, P. J., and Baak, J. P. A. (1996). J. Clin. Pathol. Mol. Pathol. 49, M214-M217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jolly, P. D., Smith, P. R., Heath, D. A., Hudson, N. L., Lun, S., Still, L. A., Watts, C. H., and McNatty, K. P. (1997). Biol. Reprod. 56, 837–846.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bussmann, L. E., and Deis, R. P. (1979). J. Steroid Biochem. 11, 1485–1489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Telleria, C. M., Carrizo, D. G., and Deis, R. P. (1994). J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 50, 161–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos M. Telleria
    • 1
    • 3
  • Alicia A. Goyeneche
    • 1
  • Juan C. Cavicchia
    • 2
  • Arturo O. Stati
    • 1
  • Ricardo P. Deis
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Reproduction and LactationCONICETMendozaArgentina
  2. 2.Institute of Histology and EmbryologyUniversity of CuyoMendozaArgentina
  3. 3.Department of Morphophysiology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of CuyoMendozaArgentina

Personalised recommendations