Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on digestive proteases from midgut glands of a shrimp, Penaeus indicus, and a lobster, Nephrops norvegicus

Part 1. proteolytic activity

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digestive gland protease pH optima and specific activities determined in Penaeus indicus with casein, azocasein, Azocoll, and Congo red fibrin as substrates were pH 7.7–9.2, 210–371 µmol of tyrosine/mg of homogenate protein/min; pH 7.8, 36; pH 6.0–7.0, 7; and pH 8.9–9.2, 7A Δ0.001 U/mg of homogenate protein/min, respectively. Activity in the shrimp was stable during frozen storage but relatively labile and very low (1.043 azocasein units) in the Norwegian lobster, Nephrops norvegicus. The high activity in shrimp is significant in aquaculture and may be a source of proteolytic enzymes for industrial use. The rapid deterioration after landing may be a consequence of the high and stable activity. The low activity in the lobster may present a problem in culture and requires a more critical choice of feed as well as further investigation. 4-(2-Aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride was a very convenient, fast-acting, and effective inhibitor of shrimp trypsin and chymotrypsin but did not completely inhibit general protease activity in shrimp and had a negligible effect on the lobster. A significant component of that activity may be from nonserine proteases (such as the exoproteases carboxypeptidase A and B and the leucine aminopeptidases), whose proportion relative to the serine proteases may be greater in the lobster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weidner, D. and Rosenberry, B. (1992), in Proceedings of the Special Session on Shrimp Farming, May 22–25, Orlando, Fl, Wyban, J., ed., World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, LA, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia, S. and Le Reste, L. (1981), F.A.O. Fisheries Technical Paper 203, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Omondi, J. G. and Stark, J. R. (1995), Aquaculture 134, 121–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kunitz, M. (1947), J. Gen. Physiol. 30, 291–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dabrowski, K. and Glogowski, J. (1977), Hydrobiologia 52(2–3), 171–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, S. and Stein, W. H. (1948), J. Biol. Chem. 176, 367–388.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kozlovskaya, E. P. and Vaskovsky, V. E. (1970), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 34, 137–142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Walter, H. E. (1984), in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 3rd ed., vol. 5, Bergmeyer, H. U., Bergmeyer, J., and GraBl, M. eds., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 270–277.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ryle, A. P. (1984), in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 3rd ed., vol. 5, Bergmeyer, H. U., Bergmeyer, J., and GraBl, M., eds., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 223–238.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charney, J. and Tomarelli, R. M. (1947), J. Biol. Chem. 171, 501–505.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Galgani, F. and Nagayama, F. (1986), Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 52(12), 2183–2188.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Galgani, F. and Nagayama, F. (1987), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 87B(1), 103–107.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Galgani, F. and Nagayama, F. (1987), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 87B(4), 889–893.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Glass, H. J. (1989), PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hummel, B. C. W. (1959), Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37(12), 1393–1399.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Erlanger, B. F., Kokowsky, N., and Cohen, W. (1961), Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 95, 271–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Geiger, R. and Fritz, H. (1984), in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 3rd ed., vol. 5, Bergmeyer, H. U., Bergmeyer, J., and GraBl, M., eds., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Geiger, R. (1984), in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 3rd ed., vol. 5, Bergmeyer, H. U., Bergmeyer, J., and GraBl, M., eds., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Folk, J. E. and Schirmer, E. W. (1963), J. Biol. Chem. 238(12), 3884–3898.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Folk, J. E., Piez, K. A., Carroll, W. R., and Gladner, J. A. (1960), J. Biol. Chem. 235, 2272–2277.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Riordan, J. F. and Holmsquist, B. (1984), in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 3rd ed., vol. 5, Bergmeyer, H. U., Bergmeyer, J., and GraBl, M., eds., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mitz, M. A. and Schleuter, R. J. (1958), Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 27, 168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Binkley, F. and Torres, C. (1960), Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 86, 201–220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tuppy, H., Wiesbauer, U., and Wintersberger, E. (1962), Hoppe-Seyler’s Zeit Physiol. Chem. 329, 278–288.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hafkenscheid, J. C. M. (1984), in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 3rd ed., vol. 5, Bergmeyer, H. U., Bergmeyer, J., and GraBl, M., eds., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clark, J., MacDonald, N. L., and Stark, J. R. (1987), Aquaculture 61, 231–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sacchar, L. A., Winter, K. K., Sicher, N., and Frankel, S. (1955), Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 90, 323–326.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Naughton, M. A. and Sanger, F. (1961), Biochem. J. 78, 256–263.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Geneste, P. and Bender, M. L. (1969), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 64, 683–685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bieth, J., Spiess, B., and Wermuth, C. G. (1974), Biochem. Med. 11, 350–357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Geiger, R. (1984), in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 3rd ed., vol. 5, Bergmeyer, H. U., Bergmeyer, J., and GraBl, M., eds., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 170–195

    Google Scholar 

  32. Omondi, J. G. (1995), PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Glass, H. J., MacDonald, N. L., Moran, R. M., and Stark, J. R. (1989), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 94B, 607–611.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. MacDonald, N. L., Stark, J. R., and Keith, M. (1989), J. World Aquat. Soc. 20, 53A.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Galgani, F. G., Benyamin, Y., and Ceccaldi, H. J. (1984), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 78B, 355–361.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, Z., Taylor, K. D., and Yan, X. (1992), Food Chem. 45, 111–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Munilla-Moran, R. and Stark, R. (1989), Aquaculture 81(3,4), 315–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Clark, J., Macdonald, N. L., and Stark, J. R. (1985), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 81B, 217–222.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Clark, J., Macdonald, N. L., and Stark, J. R. (1995), in Nutrition and Feeding in Fish, Cowey, C. B., Mackie, A. M., and Bell, J. G., eds., Academic, London, pp. 217–221.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Clark, J., Macdonald, N. L., and Stark, J. R. (1985), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 81B, 695–700.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Clark, J., Murray, K. R., and Stark, J. R. (1986), Aquaculture 53(3,4), 253–262.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Glass, H. J., MacDonald, N. L., and Stark, J. R. (1987), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 86B, 281–289.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee, P. G. and Lawrence, A. L. (1982), Physiologist 25, 241.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yan, X. and Taylor, K. D. A. (1991), Food Chem. 41, 11–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang, Z., Taylor, K. D., and Yan, X. (1994), Food Chem. 51, 99–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lovett, D. L. and Felder, D. L. (1990), Biol. Bull. 178, 144–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Khablyuk, V. V. and Proskuryakov, M. T. (1983), Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol. 19, 310–314.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Savagaon, K. A. and Sreenivasan, A. (1978), Fish. Technol. 15, 49–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Nip, W. K., Lan, C. Y., and Moy, J. H. (1985), J. Food Sci. 50, 1187, 1188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lindner, P., Angel, S., Weinberg, Z. G., and Granit, R. (1988), Food Chem. 29, 119–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ferrer, O. J., Koburger, J. A., Otwell, W. S., Gleeson, R. A., Simpson, B. K., and Marshall, M. R. (1989), J. Food Sci. 54(1), 63–67 and 176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dendringer, J. E. (1987), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 88B(2), 503–506.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Garcia-Carreno, F. L. and Haard, N. F. (1994), Process Biochem. 29(8), 663–670.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rodriguez, D., Wormhoudt, A. V., and Gal, L. Y. (1976), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 54B, 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Brockerhoff, H., Hoyle, R. J., and Hwang, P. C. (1970), J. Fish. Res. Board. Can. 27, 1357–1370.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Zwilling, R. and Neurath, H. (1981), in Methods in Enzymology, vol. 80, Proteolytic Enzymes Part C, Lorand, L., ed., Academic, New York, pp. 633–665.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  57. Zwilling, R., Dorsam, H., Torff, H. J., and Rodl, J. (1981), FEBS Lett. 127, 75–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Markwardt, F., Hoffmann, J., and Korbs, E. (1973), Thrombos. Res. 2, 343–348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Lawson, W. B., Valenty, V. B., Wos, J. D., and Lobo, A. P. (1982), Folia. Haematol. Leipzig 109(1), 52–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Turini, P., Kurooka, S., Steer, M., Corbascio, A. N., and Singer, T. P. (1969), J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 167(1), 98–104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James G. Omondi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Omondi, J.G., Stark, J.R. Studies on digestive proteases from midgut glands of a shrimp, Penaeus indicus, and a lobster, Nephrops norvegicus . Appl Biochem Biotechnol 90, 137–153 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:90:2:137

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:90:2:137

Index Entries

Navigation