Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of different cellulase preparations in the enzymatic treatment of cotton fabrics

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty-nine cellulase preparations from different sources were compared interms of their abrasive activities (the ability to remove Indigo from denim) and their ability tosaccharify cellulose. Nodirectrelationship could be found between these two abilities. The preparations were divided into three groups: (1) with a high yield of reducing sugars after 24 h hydrolysis of Avicel cellulose but low abrasive activity; (2) universal cellulases that could both effectively hydrolyze cellulose and remove Indigo from denim; and (3) cellulase samples with high abrasive activity but low saccharification ability.

Cellobiohydrolase (CBH) and xylanase were purified from different fungi by chromatofocusing on a Mono P column and subjected to limited proteolysis with papain yielding cellulose-binding and core (catalytic) domains. The adsorption ability and backstaining index of both CBH and xylanase core proteins were notably lower than the respective parameters for the in itial nondigested enzymes indicating that protein adsorption on the surface of cotton fibers is a crucial factor causing Indigo backstaining during the enzymatic denim washing procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Godfrev, T. (1996), in Industrial Enzymology, 2nd ed., (Godfrey, T. and West, S., eds.), MacMillan, London, pp. 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krichevski, G. E. (1997), Textile Chemistry (Moscow, Russia) No. 1(10), 14–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klahorst, S., Kumar, A., and Mullins, M. M. (1994), Textile Chemist and Colorist 26, 13–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Koo, H., Ueda, M., Wakida, T., Yoshimura, Y., and Igarashi, T. (1994), Textile Res. J. 64, 70–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar, A., Yoon, M.-Y., and Purtell, C. (1997), Textile Chemist and Colorist 29, 37–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavaco-Paulo, A., Morgado, J., Almeida, L., and Kilburn, D. (1998), Textile Res. J. 68, 398–401.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gusakov, A. V., Sinitsyn, A. P., Berlin, A. G., Popova, N. N., Markov, A. V., Okunev, O. N., Tikhomirov, D. F., and Emalfarb, M. (1998), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol 75, 279–293.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghose, T. K. (1987), Pure Appl. Chem. 59, 257–268.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sinitsyn, A. P., Chernoglazov, V. M., and Gusakov, A. V. (1990), Methods of Investigation and Properties of Cellulolytic Enzymes, Biotechnology Series, vol. 25, VINITI Press, Moscow, Russia.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wood, T. M. and Bhat, K. M. (1988), Methods Enzymol. 160, 87–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Tilbeurgh, H., Tomme P., Claeyssens, M., Bhikhabhai, R., and Pettersson, G. (1986), FEBS Lett. 204, 223–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander V. Gusakov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gusakov, A.V., Berlin, A.G., Popova, N.N. et al. A comparative study of different cellulase preparations in the enzymatic treatment of cotton fabrics. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 88, 119–126 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:88:1-3:119

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:88:1-3:119

Index Entries

Navigation