Improving the catabolic functions of desiccation-tolerant soil bacteria
- 49 Downloads
Bacterial strains were selected from a desiccated polluted soil for their drought tolerance and their ability to grow on diesel oil in view of incorporating them in a bioaugmentation product. These products are useful in case of recal citrant xenobiotic pollution, where there is no intrinsic biodegradation activity in the soil. These strains grow on the easily degradable components of diesel oil. In troduction of new catabolic genes into these desiccation-tolerant bacteria in order to improve their catabolic functions was considered.
Plasmid-borne catabolic genes coding for enzymes in volved in the degradation of more recalcitrant compounds (Isopropylbenzene, trichloroethene, 3-chloroben zoate, 4-chlorobiphenyl, biphenyl) were successfully introduced in some of the desiccation-tolerant strains by means of natural conjugation. Strains exhibiting good tolerance to desiccation and able to grow on the new carbon sources were obtained. The frequencies of integration of the plasmids ranged from 2×10−8 to 9.2 10−2 transconjugants/acceptor.
Drought-tolerance is indeed important for bioaugmentation because of its in trinsic ecological significance and because a bioaugmentation starter has to be conditioned in a desic cated form to ensure good shelf-life. The conservation of the properties during storage was evaluated by accelerated storage tests.
Index EntriesBicaugmentation drought tolerance conjugation plasmids preservation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Glass, D., Risto, T., and Van, Eijk J. (1995), Gen. Engineer. News 15(19), 6–9.Google Scholar
- 4.Weekers, F., Jacques, Ph., Springael, D., Mergeay, M., Diels, L., and Thonart, Ph. (1996), Med. Fac. Landbouww. Univ. Gent, 61/4b, 2161–2164.Google Scholar
- 6.Ramos, J., Duque, E., Huertas, M.-J., and Haidour, A. (1995), J. Bacteriol. 177(14), 3911–3916.Google Scholar
- 8.Ferguson, J. and Korte, F. (1981), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 24, 7–15.Google Scholar
- 9.Behki, R., Top, E., Dick, W., and Germon, P. (1993), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 1955–1959.Google Scholar
- 11.Sallis, P., Armfield, S., Bull, A., and Hardman, T. (1990), J. Gen. Microbiol. 136, 115–120.Google Scholar
- 12.Zyltra, G. and Gibson, D. (1991), in Genetic Engineering, vol. 13., Setler, J. K., ed., Plenum Press, NY, pp. 183–203.Google Scholar
- 13.Weekers, F., Jacques, Ph., Springael, D., Mergeay, M., Diels, L., and Thonart, Ph. (1997), in Proceedings of the “Workshop on Extremophiles,” Dec., 7–9, 1997, Mol Belgium.Google Scholar
- 14.Mattimore, V. and Battista, J. R. (1996), J. Bacteriol. 178, 633–637.Google Scholar
- 16.Sakane, T., Banno, I., and Iijima, T. (1983), IFO Res. Comm. 11, 14–24.Google Scholar
- 17.Simione, F. (1992), J. Parent. Sci. Technol. 46, 226–232.Google Scholar
- 18.De Valdez, G., and Diekman, H. (1993), Biology 30, 185–190.Google Scholar
- 19.Grieff, D. and Rightsel, W. (1965), J. Immunol. 98, 895–900.Google Scholar
- 20.Dabrock, B., Kesseler, M., Averhoff, B., and Gottschalk, G. (1994), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60(3), 853–860.Google Scholar
- 21.Springrel, D., Kreps, S., and Merglay, M. (1993), J. Bacteriol. 175, 1674–1681.Google Scholar
- 23.Dawn, N. and Guuralus, C. (1973), J. Bacteriol. 114, 974–979.Google Scholar