Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative study of methods for extraction and purification of environmental DNA from soil and sludge samples

  • Original Research Articles
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important prerequisite for successful construction of a metagenome library is an efficient procedure for extracting DNA from environmental samples. We compared three indirect and four direct extraction methods, including a commercial kit, in terms of DNA yield, purity, and time requirement. A special focus was on methods that are appropriate for the extraction of environmental DNA (eDNA) from very limited sample sizes (0.1 g) to enable a highly parallel approach. Direct extraction procedures yielded on average 100-fold higher DNA amounts than indirect ones. A drawback of direct extraction was the small fragment sizeof approx 12 kb. The quality of the extracted DNA was evaluated by the ability of different restriction enzymes to digest the eDNA. Only the commercial kit and a direct extraction method using freeze-thaw cell lysis in combination with an in-gel patch electrophoresis with hydroxyapatite to remove humic acid substances yielded DNA, which was completely digested by all restriction enzymes. Moreover, only DNA extracted by these two procedures could be used as template for the amplification of fragments of several 16S rDNA, 18SrDNA groups under standard polymerase chain reaction conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schleper, C., Jurgens, G., and Jonuscheit, M. (2005), Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 479–488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Streit, W. R., Daniel, R., and Jaeger, K. E. (2004), Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 15, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel, R. (2004), Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 15, 199–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Galbraith, E. A., Antonopoulos, D. A., and White, B. A. (2004), Environ. Microbiol. 6(9), 928–937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gabor, E. M., Alkema, W. B. L., and Janssen, D. B. (2004), Environ. Microbiol. 6(9), 879–886.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Voget, S., Leggewie, C., Uesbeck, A., Raasch, C., Jaeger, K.-E., and Streit, W. R. (2003), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 6235–6242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Torsvik, V. and Ovreas, L. (2002), Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 5, 240–245.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rondon, M. R., Goodman, R. M., and Handelsman, J. (1999), Science 17, 403–409.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Amann, R. I., Ludwig, W., and Schleifer, K. H. (1995), Microbiol. Rev. 59, 143–169.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zengler, K., Toledo, G., Rappé, M., Elkins, J., Mathur, E. J., Short, J. M., and Keller, M. (2002), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15,681–15,686.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaeberlein, T., Lewis, K., and Epstein, S. S. (2002), Science 296, 1127–1129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kozdrój, J. and van Elsas, J. D. (2000), Biol. Fertil. Soils 31, 372–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kauffmann, I. M., Schmitt, J., and Schmid, R. D. (2004), Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 64, 665–670.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Robe, P., Nalin, R., Capellano, C., Vogel, T. M., and Simonet, P. (2003), Eur. J. Soil Biol. 39, 183–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gabor, E. M., de Vries, E. J., and Janssen, D. B. (2003), FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 44, 153–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lloyd-Jones, G. and Hunter, D. W. F. (2001), Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 2053–2059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Quaiser, A., Ochsenreiter, T., Klenk, H.-P., et al. (2002) Environ. Microbiol. 4 (10), 603–611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Orsini, M. and Romano-Spica, V. (2001), Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 33, 17–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Courtois, S., Frostegård, Å, Göransson, P., Depret, G., Jeannin, P., and Simonet, P. (2001), Environ. Microbiol. 3(7), 431–439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tien, C. C., Chao, C. C., and Chao, W. L. (1999), J. Appl. Microbiol. 86, 937–943.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moreira, D. (1998), Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 3309, 3310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yeates, C., Gillings, M. R., Davidson, A. D., Altavilla, N., and Veal, D. A. (1997), Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 25, 303–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, J., Bruns, M. A., and Tiedje, J. M. (1996), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 316–322.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Young, C. C., Burghoff, R. L., Keim, L. G., Minak-Bernero, V., Lute, J. R., and Hinton, S. M. (1993), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 1972–1974.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jacobsen, C. S. and Rasmussen, O. F. (1992), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 2458–2462.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai, Y.-L. and Olson, B. H. (1991), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57, 1070–1074.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Holben, W. E. (1994), in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Microbiological and Biochemical Properties: Isolation and Purification of Bacterial DNA from Soil, SSSA Book Series no 5, Weaver, R. W., Angle, S., and Bottomley, P. D. eds, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 727–752.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Santos, D. A. (2001), Mol. Biochnol. 17, 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roh, C. H., Villatte, F., Kim, B. G., and Schmid, R.D. (2005), Electrophoresis, 26, 3055–3061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertrand, H., Poly, F., Van, V. T., Lombard, N., Nalin, R., Vogel, T. M., and Simonet, P. (2005), J. Microbiol. Methods 62, 1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rhee, J. K., Ahn, D. G., Kim, Y. G., and Oh, J. W. (2005), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71(2), 817–825.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ginolhac A., Jarrin C., Gillet B., et al. (2004), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 5522–5527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller, D. N., Bryant, J. E., Madsen, E. L., and Ghiorse, W. C. (1999), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 4715–4724.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Miller, D. N. (2001), J. Microbiol. Methods 44, 49–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yun, J., Kang, S., Park, S., Yoon, H., Kim, M. J., Heu, S., and Ryu, S. (2004), Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70, 7229–7235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Knietsch, A., Bowien, S., Whited, G., Gottschalk, G., and Daniel, R. (2003), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 3048–3060.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Henne, A., Schmitz, R.A., Bomeke, M., Gottschalk, G., and Daniel, R. (2000), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 3113–3116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Henne, A., Daniel, R., Schmitz, R. A., and Gottschalk, G. (1999), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 3901–3907.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Edwards, U., Rogall, T.L., Blocker, H., Emde, M., and Bottger, E. C. (1989), Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 7843–7853.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kuske, C. R., Banton, K. L., Adorada, D. L., Stark, P. C., Hill, K. K., and Jackson, P.J. (1998), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 2463–2472.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Stackebrandt, E., Liesack, W., and Goebel, B. M. (1993), FASEB J. 7, 232–236.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Yeates, C., Gillings, M. R., Davison, A. D., Altavilla, N., and Veal, D. A. (1998) Biol. Procedures 14, 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., and Taylor, J. (1990), in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications: Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics, Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J., and White, T. J., eds., Academic, New York, pp. 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

    Changhyun Roh & Byung-Gee Kim

  2. Institute of Technical Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, D-70569, Stuttgart, Germany

    Changhyun Roh, Francois Villatte & Rolf D. Schmid

Authors
  1. Changhyun Roh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francois Villatte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Byung-Gee Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rolf D. Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf D. Schmid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roh, C., Villatte, F., Kim, BG. et al. Comparative study of methods for extraction and purification of environmental DNA from soil and sludge samples. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 134, 97–112 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:134:2:97

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:134:2:97

Index Entries

Search

Navigation