Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrolysis characteristics of tissue fractions resulting from mechanical separation of corn stover

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corn stover has potential as a resource for both fiber and chemical needs if separation strategies can be developed to deal with its heterogeneity. Relative hydrolysis characteristics were assessed for pith (sclerenchyma and parenchyma) and fiber (collenchyma) tissue fractions derived from mechanical separation of corn stover to determine whether classification by tissue type resulted in fractions with different hydrolysis response. The physical characteristics of the tissue fractions were analyzed. The hydrolysis behavior of the fractions was evaluated under both acidic and basic conditions. The results from the hydrolysis experiments are compared with previously reported compositional analysis for the tissue fractions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glassher, D., Hettenhaus, J. R., and Schechinger, T. M. (1998), in Proceedings of BioEnergy 98, Weichart, D., ed., Great Lakes Regional Biomass Energy Program, Madison, WI, pp. 1100–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein, I. S., Pereira, H., et al. (1983), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 13, 17–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McParland, J. J., Grethlein, H. E., et al. (1982), Solar Energy 28, 55–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhandari, N., Macdonald, D. G., et al. (1984), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26, 320–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, R., Wu, Z., et al. (1998), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 70–72, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Belkacemi, K., Turcotte, G., et al. (2002), Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 173–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaar, W. E. and Holtzapple, M. T. (2000), Biomass and Bioenergy 18, 189–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Varga, E., Schimdt, A. S., et al. (2003), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 104, 37–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Esteghlalian, A., Hashimoto, A. G., et al. (1997), Bioresour. Technol. 59, 129–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Um, B.-H., Karim, M. N., et al. (2003), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 105–108, 115–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gould, J. M., (1984), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26, 46–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saddler, J. N., Ramos, L. P., and Breuil, C. (1993), in Bioconversion of Forest and Agricultural Plant Wastes, Saddler, J. N., ed., C.A.B. International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nevell, T. P. and Zeronian, S. H. (1985), Cellulose Chemistry and Its Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iyer, P. V., Wu, Z.-W., et al. (1996), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 57/58, 121–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Holtzapple, M. T., Jun, J., Ashok, G., Patibandla, S. L., and Dale, B. E. (1991), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28/29, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moniruzzaman, M., Dale, B. E., Hespell, R. B., and Bothast, R. J., (1997), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 67, 113–126.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang, V. S., Nagwani, M., and Holtzapple, M. T. (1998), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 74, 135–159.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, T. H., Kim, J. S., et al. (2003), Bioresour. Technol. 90, 39–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu, T. A. (1996), in Handbook on Bioethanol: Production and Utilization, Wyman, C. E., ed., Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, pp. 179–212.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grohmann, K., Torget, R. W., et al. (1986), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 17 135–151.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brett, C. and Waldron, K., eds. (1990), Physiology and Biochemistry of Plant Cell Walls, Unwin Hyman, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mosier, N. S., Hall, P., et al. (1999), Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol. 65, 23–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, S. B. and Lee, Y. Y. (2002), Bioresour. Technol. 83 165–171.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bienkowski, P. R., Ladisch, M. R., et al. (1987), Chem. Eng. Commun. 51, 179–192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, Y. Y., Iyer, P., et al. (1999), Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol. 65, 93–115.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, J. S., Lee, Y. Y., et al. (2001), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 91–93, 331–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hames, B. R., Thomas, S. R., et al. (2003), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 105–108, 5–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubio, M., Tortosa, J. F., et al. (1998), Biomass Bioenergy 15, 483–491.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Morrison, T. A., Jung, H. G., et al. (1998), Crop Sci. 38, 455–460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jones, R. W., Krull, L. H., et al. (1979), Cereal Chem. 56, 441–442.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hedin, P. A., Williams, W. P., and Buckley, P. M. (1998), J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 4754–4758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jung, H. G., Buxton, D. R., et al., eds. (1993), Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jung, H. G., Jorgensen, M. A., et al. (2000), J. Sci. Food Agric. 80, 419–427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brent H. Shanks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bootsma, J.A., Shanks, B.H. Hydrolysis characteristics of tissue fractions resulting from mechanical separation of corn stover. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 125, 27–39 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:125:1:027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:125:1:027

Index Entries

Navigation