Skip to main content
Log in

Surfactin production from potato process effluent by Bacillus subtilis in a chemostat

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biosurfactant surfactin has potential to aid in the recovery of energy resources (oil recovery) or subsurface organic contaminants (environmental remediation). However, high medium and purification costs limit its use in these high-volume applications. In previous work, we showed that surfactin could be produced from an inexpensive low-solids potato process effluent with minimal amendments or pretreatments. Previous research has also shown that surfactin can be both produced in Bacillus subtilis cultures and recovered by foam fractionation in an airlift reactor. Results using both purified potato starch and unamended low-solids potato process effluent as substrates for surfactin production indicate that the process is oxygen limited and that recalcitrant indigenous bacteria in the potato process effluent hamper continuous surfactin production. The research reported here features the use of a chemostat operated in batch mode for producing surfactin with concomitant use of antifoam to prevent surfactant loss. The antifoam did not interfere with surfactin recovery by acid precipitation or its efficacy. Initial trials took about 48 h to produce 0.9 g/L of surfactin from potato process effluent. Increasing the oxygen mass transfer by increasing the stirring speed and adding a baffle decreased production time to 12–24 h and produced about 0.6 g/L of surfactin from two different potato-processing facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson, D. N., Fox, S. L., and Bala, G. A. (2000), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 84–86, 917–930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson, D. N., Fox, S. L., and Bala, G. A. (2001), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 91–93, 487–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenberg, E. (1986), CRC Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 3(3), 109–132.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arima, K., Kakinuma, A., and Tamura, G. (1968), Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 31, 488–494.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, D. G., McDonald, C. R., Duff, S. J. B., and Kosaric, N. (1981), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42, 408–412.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Besson, F. and Michel, G. (1992), Biotechnol. Lett. 14(11), 1013–1018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Georgiou, G., Lin, S.-Y., and Sharma, M. M. (1992), Bio/Technology 10, 60–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, D. A., Lynch, H. C., and Varley, J. (2001), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 28, 346–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Noah, K. S., Fox, S. L., Bruhn, D. F., Thompson, D. N., and Bala, G. A. (2002), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 98–100, 803–813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerhardt, P., Murray, R. G. E., Wood, W. A., and Kreig, N. R., eds. (1994), Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, Chapter 22 Chemical Analysis, L. Daniels, R. S. Hanson and J. A. Phillips. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp. 518–519.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herd, M. D., Lassahn, G. D., Thomas, C. P., Bala, G. A., and Eastman, S. L. (1992), Proceedings of the DOE Eighth Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, Society of Petroleum Engineers/Department of Energy, April 22–24, Tulsa, OK. Vol#2. Paper SPE/DOE 24206, pp. 513–517.

  12. Lin, S.-C. and Jiang, H.-J. (1997), Biotechnol. Techniques 11(6), 413–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl S. Noah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noah, K.S., Bruhn, D.F. & Bala, G.A. Surfactin production from potato process effluent by Bacillus subtilis in a chemostat. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 122, 465–473 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:122:1-3:0465

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:122:1-3:0465

Index Entries

Navigation