Expression of UDP-glucose dehydrogenase reduces cell-wall polysaccharide concentration and increases xylose content in alfalfa stems
The primary cell-wall matrix of most higher plants is composed of large amounts of uronic acids, primarily d-galacturonic acid residues in the back-bone of pectic polysaccharides. Uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose dehydrogenase is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of uronic acids. We produced transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants expressing a soybean UDP-glucose dehydrogenase cDNA under the control of two promoters active in alfalfa vascular tissues. In initial greenhouse experiments, enzyme activity in transgenic lines was up to seven-fold greater than in nontransformed control plants; however, field-grown transgenic plants had only a maximum of 1.9-fold more activity than the control. Cell-wall polysaccharide content was lower and Klason lignin content was higher in transgenics compared to the nontransformed control. No significant increase in pectin or uronic acids in the polysaccharide fraction was observed in any line. Xylose increased 15% in most transgenic lines and mannose concentration decreased slightly in all lines. Because of the complexity of pectic polysaccharides and sugar biosynthesis, it may be necessary to manipulate multiple steps in carbohydrate metabolism to alter the pectin content of alfalfa.
Index EntriesCarbohydrate forage homogalacturonan lucerne protein utilization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Beever, D. E. and Mould, F. L. (2000), in Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition, Givens, D. I., Owen, E., Axford, R. F. E., and Omed, H. M., eds., CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 15–42.Google Scholar
- 2.Galyean, M. L. and Goetsch, A. L. (1993), in Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility, Jung, H. G., Buxton, D. R., Hatfield, R. D., and Ralph, J., eds., American Society of Agronomy-Crop Science Society of America-Soil Science Society of America (ASA-CSSA-SSSA), Madison, WI, pp. 33–72.Google Scholar
- 4.Nocek, J. E. and Russell, J. B. (1988), J. Dairy Sci. 71, 2070–2107.Google Scholar
- 6.Aman, P. (1993), in Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility, Jung, H. G., Buxton, D. R., Hatfield, R. D., and Ralph, J., eds., American Society of Agronomy-Crop Science Society of America-Soil Science Society of America (ASA-CSSA-SSSA), Madison, WI, pp. 183–200.Google Scholar
- 11.Dalessandro, G. and Northcote, D. H. (1977), Biochem. J. 162, 267–279.Google Scholar
- 16.Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., and Moore, D. (1995), Short Protocols in Molecular Biology: A Compendium of Methods from Current Protocols in Molecular Biology John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- 22.Theander, O., Aman, P., Westerlund, E., Andersson, R., and Petterson, D. (1995), J. A.O.A.C. Int., 78, 1020–1044.Google Scholar
- 24.SAS Institute (1988), SAS/STAT Users Guide, Release 6.03 Ed., SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
- 27.Wakabayashi, K., Sakurai, N., and Kuraishi, S. (1989), Plant Cell Physiol. 30, 99–105.Google Scholar