Skip to main content
Log in

Economic analysis of ethanol production in California using traditional and innovative feedstock supplies

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we estimate the costs of using alternative feedstocks to produce ethanol in a 40 million-gal facility in California’s San Joaquin Valley. Feedstocks include corn imported from Midwestern states and locally grown agricultural products such as corn, grapes, raisins, oranges, and other tree fruits. The estimated feedstock costs per gallon of ethanol include $0.92 for Midwestern corn, $1.21 for locally grown corn, $6.79 for grapes, $3.36 for raisins, $3.92 for citrus, and $1.42 for other tree fruit. Adjusting for coproduct values lowers the estimated net feedstock costs to $0.67/gal of ethanol for Midwestern corn, $0.96 for locally grown corn, $6.53 for grapes, and $3.30 for raisins. We also examine the potential increases in net revenue to raisin producers, made possible by having an alternative outlet available for selling surplus raisins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. California Department of Food and Agriculture. (2002), Agricultural Resource Directory, Sacramento, CA.

  2. California Department of Food and Agriculture. (1980), Ethanol Yields by Crop, Sacramento, CA. Unpublished.

  3. Urbanchuk, J. M. and Kapell, J. (2002), Ethanol and the Local Community, Renewable Fuels Association, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  4. California Department of Food and Agriculture. (2001), Agricultural Resource Directory, Sacramento, CA.

  5. California Department of Food and Agriculture. (2002), Synopsis of Standardization Provision and Procedures, Sacramento, CA.

  6. Raisin Administrative Committee. (2002), Analysis Report, Fresno, CA.

  7. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2002), Market News Reports, Market News Service, AMS, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  8. California Energy Commission. (2001), Costs and Benefits of a Biomass-to-Ethanol Production Industry in California, Sacramento, CA.

  9. Yancey, M. (2003), Paper presented at the California Ethanol Workshop, April 14, Sacramento, CA (www.bbiothanol.com/doe/ca/Yancey_CA_DOE.pdf).

  10. California Energy Commission. (1999), Evaluation of Bio-Mass to Ethanol Fuel Potential in California: Report to the Governor, Sacramento, CA.

  11. Pacific Gas and Electric. (2003), Advice Letter No. 2471-G, issued by Karen A. Tomcala, Vice President, Regulatory Relations, San Francisco, CA.

  12. Northwestern Corporation. (2002), Northwestern Energy Signs Gas Supply Contract to Serve New South Dakota Ethanol Plant, News Center News Display, Sioux Falls, SD.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Whims, J. (2002), Corn Based Ethanol Costs and Margins: Attachment 1. Agricultural Marketing Resource Center, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, KA (www.agmrc.org/corn/info/ksuethl.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shapouri, H., Gallagher, P., and Graboski, M. S. (2002), Agricultural Economic Report No. 808, US Department of Agriculture, Office of the Chief Economist.

  15. Gabler, E., Kalter, R. J., Boisvert, R. N., Walker, L. P., Pellerin, R. A., Rao, A. M., Hang, Y. D. (1981), Cornell agricultural economics staff paper, no. 81–27.

  16. Oxy Fuel News. (2002), Oxy Fuel News Price Report, 1995–2002, Hart Publications, Potomac, MD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Wichelns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burnes, E.I., Hagen, J., Wichelns, D. et al. Economic analysis of ethanol production in California using traditional and innovative feedstock supplies. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 113, 95–110 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:113:1-3:095

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:113:1-3:095

Index Entries

Navigation