Advertisement

Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 113, Issue 1–3, pp 41–54 | Cite as

Hydrodynamic separation of grain and stover components in corn silage

  • Philippe SavoieEmail author
  • Kevin J. Shinners
  • Benjamin N. Binversie
Article

Abstract

Mixing fresh silage in water resulted in partial segregation of grain from stover. Grain concentration was 75% in the sunk material when silage was relatively dry (64% moisture content [MC]) and 41% when silage was relatively wet (74% MC). Partial drying to remove 20 percentage units of moisture prior to water separation increased grain concentration to 92%, and complete drying increased grain concentration to 99%. Sieving without drying followed by water separation resulted in a grain concentration of 79%. A byproduct of water separation is a large amount of soluble and deposited fine particles in the effluent: 18% of original dry matter after one separation, and between 21 and 26% after eight separations. In an industrial setting, hydrodynamic separation of silage with minimal pretreatment could provide a feedstock with a high concentration of grain (75–80%). In a laboratory setting, hydrodynamic separation with prior oven drying could provide a method to separate grain from stover in corn silage by reaching a grain concentration higher than 99%.

Index Entries

Corn stover grain separation silage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Richey, C. B., Liljedhal, J. B., and Lechtenberg, V. L. (1982), Trans. ASAE 25(4), 834–839, 844.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jenkins, B. M. and Sumner, H. R. (1986), Trans. ASAE 29(3), 824–836.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ganesh, D. and Mowat, D. N. (1983), Can. J. Plant Sci. 63, 935–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bilanski, W. K., Jones, D. K., and Mowat, D. N. (1986), Trans. ASAE 29(5), 1188–1192.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corn Refiners Association. (1996), Corn Oil. 4 th Edition. Corn Refiners Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gustafson, R. J. and Hall, G. E. (1972), Trans. ASAE 15(3), 523–525.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pitt, R. E. (1983), Trans. ASAE 26(5), 1522–1527, 1532.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ASAE. (2002), Moisture Measurement—Forages. ASAE S358.2. Standards, 49th Edition. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ASTM. (2003), Standard Test Method for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Gas Pycnometer. Designation D5550-00. Volume 04.08. American Society for Testing Materials, accessed at Website: www.astm.org.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shinners, K. J., Jirovec, A. G., Shaver, R. D., and Bal, M. (2000), Appl. Eng. Agr. 16(4), 323–331.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASAE. (2002), Method of Determining and Expressing Particle Size of Chopped Forage Material by Screening. ANSI/ASAE S424.1. Standards, 49 th Edition. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steel, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H., and Dickey, D. A. (1996), Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3 rd Edition. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Savoie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kevin J. Shinners
    • 2
  • Benjamin N. Binversie
    • 2
  1. 1.Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaSainte-FoyCanada
  2. 2.Biological Systems Engineering DepartmentUniversity of WisconsinMadison

Personalised recommendations