Skip to main content
Log in

Reducing waste contamination from animal-processing plants by anaerobic thermophilic fermentation and by flesh fly digestion

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is currently no market in Israel for the large amounts of waste from fish- and poultry-processing plants. Therefore, this waste is incinerated, as part of the measures to prevent the spread of pathogens. Anaerobic methanogenic thermophilic fermentation (AMTF) of wastes from the cattle-slaughtering industry was examined previously, as an effective system to treat pathogenic bacteria, and in this article, we discuss a combined method of digestion by thermophilic anaerobic bacteria and by flesh flies, as a means of waste treatment. The AMTF process was applied to the wastes on a laboratory scale, and digestion by rearing of flesh fly (Phaenicia sericata) and housefly (Musca domestica) larvae on the untreated raw material was done on a small scale and showed remarkable weight conversion to larvae. The yield from degradation of poultry waste by flesh fly was 22.47% (SD=3.89) and that from fish waste degradation was 35.34% (SD=12.42), which is significantly higher than that from rearing houseflies on a regular rearing medium. Bacterial contents before and after thermophilic anaerobic digestion, as well as the changes in the chemical composition of the components during the rearing of larvae, were also examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klinger, I. and Marchaim, U. (1987). Isr. J. Vet. Med. 43, 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zenkevitch, L. A. (1969), Prosveshenie (Moscow) 3, 516–518 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prete, P. E. (1997), Life Sci. 60, 505–510.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Casu, R., Eisemann, C., Vuocola, T., and Tellam, R. (1996), Int. Parasitol. 6, 623–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wijffels, G., Gough, J., Muharsini, S., Donaldson, A., and Eisemann, C. (1997), Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 5, 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cunniff, P., ed. (1995), Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), Gaithersburg, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vanderzant, C. and Splittstoesser, D. F. (1992), Compendium of Methods for the Microbial Examination of Food, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marchaim, U., Kostenberg, D., and Epstein, E. (1997), Mikrobiologiya 66, 706–711.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salminen, E., Rintala, J., Lokshina, L. Y., and Vavilin, V. A. (2000), Water Sci. Technol. 41, 33–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Marchaim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchaim, U., Gelman, A. & Braverman, Y. Reducing waste contamination from animal-processing plants by anaerobic thermophilic fermentation and by flesh fly digestion. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 109, 107–115 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:107

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:107

Index Entries

Navigation