Skip to main content
Log in

Enzyme recovery and recycling following hydrolysis of ammonia fiber explosion-treated corn stover

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both cellulase and cellobiase can be effectively recovered from hydrolyzed biomass using an ultrafiltration recovery method. Recovery of cellulase ranged from 60 to 66.6% and for cellobiase from 76.4 to 88%. Economic analysis shows that cost savings gained by enzyme recycling are sensitive to enzyme pricing and loading. At the demonstrated recovery of 60% and current loading of 15 Filter paper units of cellulase/g of glucan, enzyme recycling is expected to generate a cost savings of approx 15%. If recovery efficiency can be improved to 70%, the savings will increase to >25%, and at 90% recovery the savings will be 50%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project. Quarterly Update. January/March 2004, #2, http://www.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/35605.pdf.

  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Cellulase Cost-Reduction Contracts. Last updated: May 23, 2004, http://www.eere.energy.gov/biomass/cellulase_cost.html

  3. Dale, B. E. and Weaver, J. K. (2000), US patent 6,106,888.

  4. Dale, B. E. (1986), US patent 4,600,590, pp. 1–7.

  5. Wilke, C. R., Yang, R. D. and Stockar, U. V. (1976), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 19, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Linko, M. (1977), in Advances in Biochemical Engineering, vol. 5, Ghose, T. K., Fiechter, A., and Blakebrough, N., eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gregg, D. J. and Saddler, J.N. (1996), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 51, 375–383.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moniruzzaman, M., Dale, B. E., Hespell, R. B., and Bothast, R. J. (1997), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 67, 113–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alkasrawi, M., T. Eriksson, J. Borjesson, A. Wingren, M Galbe, F. Tjerneld, and G. Zacchi. (2003), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 33, 71–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eriksson, T., J. Karlsson, and F. Tjerneld. (2002), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 31, 353–364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zaldivar, M., J.C. Velasquez, I. Contreras, and L.M. Perez. (2001), Electronic J. Biotechnol. (online), December 15, 2001, vol. 4, no. 3, http://www.ejb.org/content/vol4/issue3/full/7.

  12. Konig J., R. Grasser, H. Pilor, and K. Vogel. (2002), Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 374, 80–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernie Steele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steele, B., Raj, S., Nghiem, J. et al. Enzyme recovery and recycling following hydrolysis of ammonia fiber explosion-treated corn stover. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 124, 901–910 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:124:1-3:0901

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:124:1-3:0901

Index Entries

Navigation