Advertisement

Chromatographia

, Volume 71, Supplement 1, pp 125–128 | Cite as

Determination of 1,4-Dichlorobenzene in Environmental Matrices

  • Zoltan Juvancz
  • Rita Bodane-Kendrovics
  • Peter Beleznay
  • Istvan Erdelyi
  • Maria Klujber-Mohr
Limited Short Communication
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

1,4-Dichlorobenzene is a frequently used lavatory deodorant although it has strong endocrine disrupting and potential carcinogenic effects. A large amount (approximately 15,000 tonnes annually worldwide) of this compound is released into the environment. This paper deals with the determination of 1,4-dichlorobenzene in a variety of environmental matrices. Various extraction and concentration methods such as charcoal absorbtion tubes and headspace sampling were applied. Sensitive and selective ion monitoring GC-MS measurements were used for determination. Significant concentrations of the compound have been identified in lavatory air, waste water, waste water sludge and human breast milk.

Keywords

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry Various environmental matrices Waste water 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Pollution 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The NKTH-OTKA No. NI-68863 and OTKA K72861 grants are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Amoore JE, Hautala (1983) J Appl Toxicol 3:272–290. DOI: 10.1002/jat.2550030603
  2. 2.
    EIENCS No. 203-400-5 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mackay D, Shiu WY, Ma KC (1995) Illustrated handbook of physical-chemical properties and environmental fate for organic chemicals, vol III. Lewis Publishers, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hansch C, Leo A (1995) Exploring QSAR. Fundamentals and applications in chemistry and biology. ACS Professional Reference Book, American Chemical Society, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oliver BG, Nimii AJ (1983) Environ Sci Technol 17:287–291. doi: 10.1021/es00111a009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang MJ, Jones KC (1994) J Agric Food Chem 42:2322–2328. doi: 10.1021/jf00046a046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mes J, Davies DJ, Turton D, Sun WF (1986) Food Addit Contam 3:313–322Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The Merck Index (1983) 10th edn. Rahway, Merck Co., Inc, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Makita Y (2008) Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 102:360–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dangerous substance directive (1986) (86/280/EEC)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (1998) Threshold limit values (TLVs) for chemical substances and physical agents biological exposure indices. ACGIH, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    IARC (1999) Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT (Multivolume work) 265:73Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards (1997) DHHS Publication No. 97–14, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office 96:16Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, Sect. 112 (b) (1) Public Law 101–549 Nov. 15Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC) (1993) Summary of state and federal drinking water standards and guidelines (11/93)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ORS (Office of Research and Standards) (March 4, 1998) Memorandum from Carol Rowan WestGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu W, Zheng M, Xing Y, Wang D (2004) Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 73:93–97. doi: 10.1007/s00128-004-0398-9 Google Scholar
  18. 18.

Copyright information

© Vieweg+Teubner Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoltan Juvancz
    • 1
  • Rita Bodane-Kendrovics
    • 1
  • Peter Beleznay
    • 2
  • Istvan Erdelyi
    • 3
  • Maria Klujber-Mohr
    • 4
  1. 1.Environmental Engineering InstituteUniversitas BudensisBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Balint Analitics Ltd.BudapestHungary
  3. 3.Budapest Sewage Works Ltd.BudapestHungary
  4. 4.VITUKI Plc.BudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations