Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical Fingerprinting and Hierarchical Clustering Analysis of Centella asiatica from Different Locations in China

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Centella asiatica (L.) Urban is a widely distributed herbaceous plant with great medicinal value that has been extensively used in traditional Chinese medicine. For effective quality control of C. asiatica, a feasible approach and control system is necessary. In this paper, a chemical fingerprint method (column liquid chromatography) was developed for investigating and demonstrating the variance of chemical components among different populations of C. asiatica, from 14 locations in China. The LC data showed considerable variation of chemical constituents among C. asiatica populations. Four chemotypes were visually developed from the chromatographic profiles. The hierarchical clustering analysis further suggested that the samples were divided into four major groups. The grouping of 14 C. asiatica populations in hierarchical clustering analysis was in good agreement with the visual comparison of their chromatograms, as demonstrated by chemotypes. In addition, the bioactive compound asiaticoside in this herb was quantitatively determined by a validated reversed-phase liquid chromatography analysis. Chemotype I was identified as asiaticoside-rich chemotype and exhibited significantly higher amounts of asiaticoside. These findings and results provide a solid basis to establish good agriculture practice and select geo-authentic crude drug for C. asiatica. The established method was considered to be suitable for fingerprint analysis for the quality control of C. asiatica.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Normile D (2003) Science 299:188–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC (1998) JAMA 280:1569–1575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chevallier A, Namba T (2000) The encyclopedia of medicinal plants. Seibundo Shinkosha Publishing Co. Ltd, China, p 74

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joshi SG (2000) Medicinal plants. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta R, Flora SJS (2006) J Appl Toxicol 26:213–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Punuree K, Wild CP, Kasinrerk W, Vinitketkumnuen U (2005) Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 6:396–400

    Google Scholar 

  7. Subban R, Veerakumar A, Manimaran R, Hashim KM, Balachandran I (2008) J Nat Med 62:369–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshida M, Fuchigami M, Nagao T, Okabe H, Matsunaga K, Takata J, Karube Y, Tsuchihashi R, Kinjo J, Mihashi K, Fujioka T (2005) Biol Pharm Bull 28(1):173–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Park BC, Bosire KO, Lee ES, Lee YS, Kim JA (2005) Cancer Lett 218:81–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. European Pharmacopoeia (2002) 4th edn

  11. Sampson JH, Raman A, Karlsen G, Navsaria H, Leigh IM (2001) Phytomedicine 8(3):230–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shukla A, Rasik AM, Dhawan DN (1999) Phytother Res 13:50–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu L, Ying K, Wei SM, Fang Y, Liu YL, Lin HF, Ma L, Mao YM (2004) Int J Dermatol 43:801–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Das A, Mallick R (1991) Bot Bull Acad Sin 32:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Randriamampionona D, Diallo B, Rakotoniriana F, Rabemanantsoa C, Cheuk K, Corbisier AM, Mahillon J, Ratsimamanga S, Jaziri ME (2007) Fitoterapia 78:482–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. WHO (2000) General guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicine. WHO, Geneva, p 1

  17. FDA (2000) Guidance for industry-botanical drug products (draft guidance) FDA, Washington, DC, I, B, 2e; 3e

  18. EMA (2001) Note for guidance on quality of herbal medicinal products European Medicines Agency, London, p 6

  19. SFDA. State Drug Administration of China (2000) Requirements for studying fingerprint of traditional Chinese medicine injection (Draft). Chin Tradition Patent Med 22:671–675

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K (2004) J Chromatogr B 812:53–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schaneberg BT, Mikell JR, Bedir E, Khan IA (2003) Pharmazie 58:381–384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pan J, Kai GQ, Yuan CX, Zhou BB, Jin RS, Yuan Y (2007) Chin J Chromatogr 25(3):316–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30572327). We thank Dr. C. J. Zheng, School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, China, for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu-Ping Qin.

Additional information

Xiao-Gang Zhang and Ting Han have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, XG., Han, T., Zhang, QY. et al. Chemical Fingerprinting and Hierarchical Clustering Analysis of Centella asiatica from Different Locations in China. Chroma 69, 51–57 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0851-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0851-8

Keywords

Navigation