Skip to main content
Log in

Chromatographic Behavior of Fosinopril Sodium and Fosinoprilat Using Neural Networks

  • Limited Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the chromatographic characterization of fosinopril sodium and fosinoprilat is presented. The first stept was pK a determination for the active substance and its degradation product using RP-LC. It was followed by optimization employing the combination of experimental design and artificial neural networks. For the definition of input and output variables, the central composite design for three factors was built. Back propagation algorithm was applied to model the system, and then the optimization of the experimental conditions was carried out in the neural network with 3-8-2 structure, which confirmed to be able to provide the maximum performance. From the method optimization, the most appropriate experimental conditions for fosinopril sodium and fosinoprilat analysis were extracted. The optimized method was validated and applied in the quality control of tablets and for forced degradation studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hameda AB, Elosta S, Havel J (2005) J Chromatogr A 1084:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Novotna K, Havliš J, Havel J (2005) J Chromatogr A 1096:50–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marengo E, Gianotti V, Angioi S, Gennaro MC (2004) J Chromatogr A 1029:57–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tran ATK, Hyne RV, Pablo F, Day WR, Doble P (2006) Talanta 71:1268–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Havel J, Madden JE, Haddad PR (1999) Chromatographia 49:481–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang H, Liu W (2004) J Sep Sci 27:1189–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Siouffi AM, Phan-Tan-Luu R (2000) J Chromatogr A 892:75–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arulsudar N, Subramanian N, Murthy RSR (2005) J Pharm Pharm Sci 8:243–258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glass BD, Agatonovic-Kustrin S, Wisch MH (2005) Curr Drug Discov Technol 2(3):195–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Takayama K, Fujikawa M, Nagai T (1999) Pharm Res 16(1):1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gašperlin M, Tušar L, Tušar M, Kristl J, Šmid-Korbar J (1998) Int J Pharm 168:243–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tham SZ, Agatonovic-Kustrin S (2002) J Pharm Biomed Anal 28:581–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruggieri F, D′Archivio AA, Carlucci G, Mazzeo P (2005) J Chromatogr A 1076:163–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Magri AL, Balestrieri F, Magri AD, Marini D (1995) Talanta 42:1719–1723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saglik S, Sagirli O, Atmaca S, Ersoy L (2000) Anal Chim Acta 427(2):253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Erk N (2002) J Pharm Biomed Anal 27(6):901–912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozkan SA, Akay C, Cevheroglu S, Saenurk Z (2001) J Liq Chromatogr 24(7):983–991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lozano R, Warren FV, Perlman S, Joseph JM (1995) J Pharm Biomed Anal 13:139–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hillaert S, Vander Heyden Y, Van den Bossche W (2002) J Chromatogr A 978:231–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hillaert S, Van den Bossche W (2000) J Chromatogr A 895:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hillaert S, De Grauwe K, Van den Bossche W (2001) J Chromatogr A 924:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hillaert S, Van den Bossche W (2001) J Pharm Biomed Anal 25:775–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jemal M, Ivashkiv E, Ribick M, Cohen AI (1985) J Chromatogr 345:299–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jemal M, Mulvanab DE (2000) J Chromatogr B 739:255–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jemal M, Huang M, Mao Y, Whiga D, Schuster A (2000) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 14(12):1023–1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jančić B, Ivanović D, Medenica M, Malenović A, Dimković N (2005) J Chromatogr A 1008:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lewen N, Schenkenberger M, Larkin T, Conder S, Brittain HG (1995) J Pharm Biomed Anal 13:879–883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jančić B, Ivanović D, Medenica M, Malenović A (2003) Acta Chim Slov 50:327–333

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ivanović D, Medenica M, Jančić B, Malenović A, Marković S (2004) Chromatographia 60:S87–S92

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jančić B, Medenica M, Ivanović D, Malenović A, Marković S (2005) Anal Bioanal Chem 383:687–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bakshi M, Singh S (2002) J Pharm Biomed Anal 28:1011–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chandran S, Singh SP (2007) Pharmazie 62:4–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Ministry of Science for supporting these investigations in Project 142077G.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Medenica Mirjana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biljana, J., Mirjana, M., Darko, I. et al. Chromatographic Behavior of Fosinopril Sodium and Fosinoprilat Using Neural Networks. Chroma 67 (Suppl 1), 123–127 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0575-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0575-9

Keywords

Navigation