, Volume 64, Issue 1–2, pp 1–5 | Cite as

The Influence of Stop-Flow on Band Broadening of Peptides in Micro-Liquid Chromatography

  • B. Q. Tran
  • E. Lundanes
  • T. Greibrokk


Stop-flow techniques are occasionally needed in combinations of LC-NMR and LC-MS. During the interval when there is no flow on the column, axial diffusion of components not yet eluted can be expected to take place. In this paper the size of the band broadening which is caused by diffusion during stop-flow has been determined for two peptides on reversed-phase packed micro columns. Within a temperature range of 20–40 °C, stop-flow could be extended to 30 minutes for peptides having k values in the range of 0.7–5.1 with little increase in band width on 1.0 mm i.d. columns at isocratic conditions. Stop-flow for 6 h at 20 °C increased the peak width of bradykinin and leucine-enkephalin by 25% and 60%, respectively, depending on the secondary interactions of the peptides. The peak broadening increased with increasing temperature (from 20 to 40 °C), as expected, and the impact was significant at stop-flow times larger than 2 h. Stop-flow during gradient elution resulted in less increase in peak width than isocratic elution due to the peak compression obtained when re-entering the gradient. At 20 °C the effective diffusion coefficients of leucine-enkephalin and bradykinin were determined to 6.5 × 10−7cm 2/s and 5.5 × 10−7 cm2/s, respectively, on the packed micro column.


Column liquid chromatography LC-NMR Band broadening Stop-flow on micro column Bradykinin and leucine-enkephalin 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Silva Elipe MV (2003) Anal Chim Acta 497:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Olson DL, Norcross JA, Ó Neill-Johnson M, Molitor PF, Detlefsen DJ, Wilson AG, Peck TL (2004) Anal Chem 76:2966–2974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Xiao HB, Krucker M, Putzback K, Albert K (2005) J Chromatogr A 1067:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Knox JH (1999) J Chromatogr A 831:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Striegel AM (2001) J Chromatogr A 932:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Popovici ST, Kok WTh, Schoenmakers PJ (2004) J Chromatogr A 1060:237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding J, Vouros P (1997) Anal Chem 69:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Prüß A, Kempter Ch, Gysler J, Jira T (2003) J Chromatogr A 1016:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beisler AT, Schaefer KE, Weber SG (2003) J Chromatogr A 986:247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Billen J, Gzil P, De Smet J, Vervoort N, Desmet G (2006) Anal Chim Acta 557:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berthod A, Chartieer F, Rocca J-L (1989) J Chromatogr 469:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knox JH, Scott HP (1983) J Chromatogr 282:297–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen J, Weber S (1983) Anal Chem 55:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hinshaw JV (2004) LC-GC Europe 17(4):216–223Google Scholar
  15. Brown PR, Hartwick RA (1989) In: HPLC, John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  16. Hosoya O, Chono S, Saso Y, Juni K, Morimoto K, Seki T (2004) J Pharm and Pharmacol 56:1501–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Seki T, Mochida J, Okamoto M, Hosoya O, Juni K, Morimoto K (2003) Chem Pharm Bull 51(6):734–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn/GWV Fachverlage GmbH 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations