Advertisement

Chromatographia

, Volume 62, Issue 7–8, pp 401–407 | Cite as

Electrophoretic Behavior Study of Bacteria of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Edwardsiella tarda and Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli by Capillary Electrophoresis with UV and Fluorescence Detection

  • L. J. Yu
  • S. F. Y. Li
Article

Abstract

Capillary electrophoresis approaches have been utilized for the study of bacteria under specific experimental conditions. The main objective within our research work was to study electrophoretic behaviors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by means of capillary electrophoresis with UV and fluorescence detection. Edwardsiella tarda and Enteropathogenic escherichia coli were also included in the study. The results showed that proper pretreatment (vortexing or sonication) for each bacterial sample before injection was necessary to disperse the clusters of cells, which is helpful to observe the single peaks and better peak shape of bacteria during electrophoresis. Apart from this, it was found that ionic strength of buffer affected mobilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a result of increasing of buffer concentration from 25 mM to 150 mM. Moreover, sharp and single peaks were still observed without significant increase of noise in the concentration range. Eventually, mixtures of bacteria were well separated under optimized separation conditions with UV and fluorescence detection. In the mean time, comparison of concentration sensitivities for Pseudomonas aeruginosa by UV and fluorescence detection was made. Blue light emitting diode induced fluorescence detection was found to be more sensitive (8.5-fold higher) than UV detection with home-made fluorescence detection system. Generally, proposed CE methods for the analysis of bacteria could be potentially valuable for the monitoring of bacteria contamination in real life.

Keywords

Capillary electrophoresis Bacteria Edwardsiella tarda Enteropathogenic escherichia coli Pseudomonas aeruginosa 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stinson SC (1999) Chem Eng News 77:36–38Google Scholar
  2. Mouritsen N, Hillyard DR (1999) Anal Chem 71:293R–366RCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belgrader P, Benett W, Hadley D, Richards J, Stratton P, Mariella R, Milanovich F (1999) Sci 284:449–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Desai MJ, Armstrong DW (2003) Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:38–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Volpi N (2004) Electrophoresis 25:692–696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Volipi N (2003) Electrophoresis 24:3097–3103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Figeys D, Aebersold RJ (1997) J Chromatogr B 695:163–168Google Scholar
  8. Ye ML, Hu S, Schoenherr RM, Dovichi NJ (2004) Electrophoresis 25:1319–1326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pontoglio A, Vigano A, Sebastiano R, Maragnoli L, Righetti PG, Gelfi C (2004) Electrophoresis 25:1065–1070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Joshua CS, Michael CB, Yien CK, Katie MH, James PL (2003) Anal Chem 75:986–994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuo IT, Chiu TC, Chang HT (2003) Electrophoresis 24:3339–3347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Okun VM, Blaas D, Kenndler E (1999) Anal Chem 71:4480–4485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Okun VM, Blaas D, Kenndler E (2001) Anal Chem 73:3900–3906CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kremser L, Okun VM, Nicodemou A, Blaas D, Kenndler E (2004) Anal Chem 76:882–887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hjerten S, Elenbring K, Kilar F, Liao J (1987) J Chromatogr 403:47–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ebersole RC, McCormick RM (1983) Bio/technology 11:1278–1282Google Scholar
  17. Pfetsch A, Welsch T (1997) Fresenius J Anal Chem 359:198–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Torimura M, Lto S, Kano K, Lkeda T, Esaka Y, Ueda T (1999) J Chromatogr B 721:31–37Google Scholar
  19. Yamada K, Torimura M, Kurata S, Kamagata Y, Kanagawa T, Kano K, Ikeda T, Yokomaku T, Kurane R (2001) Electrophoresis 22:3413–3417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Armstrong DW, Schulte G, Schneiderheinze JM, Westenberg DJ (1999) Anal Chem 71:5465–5469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schneiderheinze JM, Armstrong DW, Schulte G, Westenberg DJ (2000) FEMS Microbiol Lett 189:39–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Armstrong DW, He L (2001) Anal Chem 73:4551–4557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Armstrong DW, Schneiderheinze JM, Kullman JP, He L (2001) FEMS Microbiol Lett 194:33–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Armstrong DW, Schneiderheinze JM (2000) Anal Chem 72:4474–4476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yu LJ, Yuan LL, Feng HT, Li SFY (2004) Electrophoresis 25:3139–3143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Girod M, Armstrong DW (2002) Electrophoresis 23:2048–2056CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dai DS, Chen Y, Yu X, Qi L (2003) Electrophoresis 24:3219–3223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schnabel U, Fischer CH, Kenndler E (1997) J Microcol Separ 9:529–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zheng JJ, Yeung ES (2003) Anal Chem 75:818–824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Armstrong DW, Girod M, He LF, Rodriguez MA, Wei W, Zheng JJ, Yeung ES (2002) Anal Chem 74:5523–5530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shen YF, Berger SJ, Smith RD (2000) Anal Chem 72:4603–4607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kenndler E, Blaas D (2001) Trends in Anal Chem 20:543–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoerr V, Stich A, Holzgrabe U (2004) Electrophoresis 25:3132–3138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn/GWV Fachverlage GmbH 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryNational University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations