Advertisement

HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 83–93 | Cite as

Kollaboration oder Wettbewerb: ein Vergleich der Motivation beim Game-based Learning

  • Linda EckardtEmail author
  • Rebecca Finster
Schwerpunkt
  • 53 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Spielerisches Lernen ist ein aktueller Trend. Sogenanntes Game-based Learning (GBL) führt zu einer positiven Beeinflussung von Spaß, Motivation und Engagement. In entsprechenden Anwendungen sind jedoch häufiger Wettbewerbselemente als kollaborative Elemente integriert, obwohl dies negative Auswirkungen auf ein erfolgreiches Lernen haben kann. In diesem Beitrag wird daher untersucht, ob eine GBL Anwendung nur mit Kollaboration genauso motiviert zu lernen, wie eine Anwendung mit Kollaboration und Wettbewerb. Die Ergebnisse der Studie zeigen, dass kollaboratives GBL genauso motiviert wie GBL mit einer Kombination aus Kollaboration und Wettbewerb.

Schlüsselwörter

Game-based Learning Serious Game Kollaboration Wettbewerb Motivation 

Collaboration or Competition: a Comparison of Motivation in Game-based Learning

Abstract

Playful learning is a current trend. Game-based learning (GBL) leads to a positive influence on fun, motivation and commitment. In such applications, competitive elements are more often integrated than collaborative elements, although this can have negative effects on successful learning. Therefore, we examine in this paper, whether a GBL application with collaboration is as motivating for learning as an application with a combination of collaboration and competition. The results of the study show that collaborative GBL is as motivating as GBL is with a combination of collaboration and competition.

Keywords

Game-based learning Serious game Collaboration Competition Motivation 

Literatur

  1. Bartle R (1996) Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. https://mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm. Zugegriffen: 27. Aug. 2018Google Scholar
  2. Chen ZH, Chan TW (2008) Learning by substitutive competition: Nurturing My-pet for game competition based on open learner model. In: Proc. of the 2nd IEEE int. Conf. on digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning, S 124–130Google Scholar
  3. Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Dillenbourg P (1999) Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Advances in learning and instruction series. Emerald, BingleyGoogle Scholar
  5. Dillenbourg P, Järvelä S, Fischer F (2009) The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Balacheff N, Ludvigsen S, de Jong T, Lazonder A, Barnes S (Hrsg) Technology-enhanced learning. Springer, Dordrecht, S 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamari J, Koivisto J, Sarsa H (2014) Does gamification work?—a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: Proc. of the 47th Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS), S 3025–3034Google Scholar
  7. Heckhausen D (1988) Motivation und Handeln. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Kapp KM (2012) The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. Keller JM, Kopp TW (1987) An application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In: Reigeluth CM (Hrsg) Instructional theories in action. Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, S 289–320Google Scholar
  10. Romero M, Usart M, Ott M, Earp J, de Freitas S (2012) Learning through playing for or against each other? Promoting collaborative learning in digital game based learning. In: Proc. of the European Conf. on Information SystemsGoogle Scholar
  11. Roschelle J, Teasley SD (1995) The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Comput Support Collab Learn 128:69–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5 Google Scholar
  12. Sanchez E, Mandran N (2017) Exploring competition and collaboration behaviors in game-based learning with playing analytics. In: European Conf. on Technology Enhanced Learning, S 467–472Google Scholar
  13. Siemon D, Becker F, Eckardt L, Robra-Bissantz S (2017) One for all and all for one-towards a framework for collaboration support systems. Educ Inf Technol:1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9651-9
  14. Vorderer P, Hartmann T, Klimmt C (2003) Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: The role of competition. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Entertainment computing, S 1–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehrstuhl Informationsmanagement, Institut für WirtschaftsinformatikTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigDeutschland

Personalised recommendations