Skip to main content
Log in

Imperfections in tree stand failures

  • Case Histories
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyses of two climbing tree stand accidents are presented to show that serious imperfections in the chains would not have produced the failures had the tree stands been used within rated capacity. Stress analysis and tests demonstrated that roller chain with cracked links could operate at rated capacity without further crack growth and showed that loads approximately three times rated capacity were required to cause the pullout of an improperly staked pin. Although the chains in the tree stands involved in both accidents had serious imperfections, the imperfections did not produce a failure of the product within the rated capacity of the tree stands. However, operating conditions in excess of the rated capacity exposed the imperfections and led to the failures. Neither imperfection should have been considered a defect because they did not reduce the capacity of the tree stands below the rated capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.T. Becker, R.J. Shipley, and D. Aliya: “Use of the Term Defect,” J. Failure Anal. Prevent., 2005, 5(2), pp. 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Blake: “Curved Beams and Hooks,” Practical Stress Analysis in Engineering Design, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1982, chapter 28, pp. 329–49.

  3. S.P. Timoshenko and J.M. Gere: Mechanics of Materials, D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, 1972, pp. 335–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clarke, C.K., Halimunanda, D. Imperfections in tree stand failures. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 6, 24–30 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1361/154770206X99299

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1361/154770206X99299

Keywords

Navigation