Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 11–16 | Cite as

Metallurgical failure analysis of a horse trailer: A criminal investigation

  • D. V. Niebuhr
Case Histories
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

Following the deaths of three people involved in a vehicular collision with an ejected horse, criminal charges were brought against the horse’s owner. Failure analysis was performed on the horse’s trailer to determine its roadworthiness. The failure mode of the hinge between the door and frame became the focus of the investigation. The analysis concentrated on proving whether or not the hinge was broken prior to the collision; that the trailer was not roadworthy; and whether the trailer was capable of safely transporting two horses on a public freeway. Analysis using optical microscopy and the scanning electron microscope indicated the hinge was significantly corroded and mechanically deformed. Additionally, there was evidence of paint on an alleged fresh fracture surface. The results were presented at the trial of the defendant.

Keywords

accident reconstruction engineering expert litigation failure analysis SEM weld fracture surface 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Trial testimony of coroner, San Luis Obispo, CA, Mar 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Dinse et al.: “Criminal or Gross Negligence—Defined,” California Jury Instructions, Criminal, Section 3.36, 7th ed., 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Peterson: Personal interview, California Highway Patrol, San Luis Obispo, CA, Dec 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Linnens: Personal interview, California Highway Patrol, San Luis Obispo, CA, Dec 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Nguyen et al.: The Effect of Undercut and Residual Stresses on Fatigue Behaviour of Misaligned Butt Joints,” Eng. Fract. Mech., Oct 1996, 55(3), pp. 453–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.B. Wintle et al.: “Technical Failure Investigation of Welded Structures (or How to Get the Most out of Failures),” Eng. Fail. Anal., Dec 2005, 12(6), pp. 1027–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chap. 8 and 23, Principles of Industrial Welding, James F. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Talkan et al.: Modeling of Paint Flow Rate Flux for Circular Paint Sprays by Using Experimental Paint Thickness Distribution,” Mech. Res. Commun., Sep–Oct 1999, 26(5), pp. 609–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.B. Chen et al.: Development of Al-Containing Zinc-Rich Paints for Corrosion Resistance,” Appl. Surf. Sci., Feb 2002, 187(1–2), pp. 154–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Tiarks et al.: “Formulation Effects on the Distribution of Pigment Particles in Paints,” Prog. Org. Coatings, Dec 2003, 48(2–4), pp. 140–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Davidson: Personal interview, Cuesta College Automotive Technology Department, San Luis Obispo, CA, June 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Micheli: Understanding How a Spray Gun Atomizes Paint, ” Met. Finish., Oct 2003, 101(10), pp. 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. V. Niebuhr
    • 1
  1. 1.California Polytechnic State University — Materials EngineeringSan Luis Obisop

Personalised recommendations