Failure analysis of superheater tube supports of the primary reformer in a fertilizer factory

  • F. Gulshan
  • Q. Ahsan
  • A. S. M. A. Haseeb
  • E. Haque
Peer Reviewed Articles


A failure analysis of superheater tube supports of the primary reformer in a local fertilizer factory is presented. A number of tube supports failed at approximately half of their designed service life. Following the failure, the factory was visited, and relevant information and samples were collected. The samples were investigated in the laboratory by chemical analysis, macro- and microhardness measurements, macro-and micrometallographic examinations, and X-ray diffractometry. The analysis showed the supports were fabricated from HH-type heat-resisting alloy and that the failure mode was high-temperature creep. The microstructure of the alloy showed the presence of massive intergranular as well as intragranular σ-phase and intragranular needle-shaped M23C6 carbides. It was also concluded from the formation of massive σ-phase in the tube that the failure was hastened because the supports were operating at approximately 800 °C. The alloy composition led to the formation of σ-phase under the operating conditions of the reformer, and the use of an alloy with a higher concentration of austenite-stabilizing element(s) could have avoided the failure.


creep failure analysis reformer tube support σ-phase 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J.K.L. Lai, D.J. Chastell, and P.E.J. Flewitt: “Precipitate Phases in Type 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel Resulting from Long-Term High Temperature Service,” Mater. Sci. Eng., 1981, 49, pp. 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Properties and Selection of Metals, vol. 1, Metals Handbook, 8th ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.H. Frost and M.F. Ashby: Deformation Mechanism Maps: The Plasticity and Creep of Metals and Ceramics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K., 1982.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.E. Reed-Hill: Physical Metallurgy Principles, Affiliated East-West Press Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Metallography, Structures and Phase Diagrams, vol. 8, Metals Handbook, 8th ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Rodriguez, S. Haro, A. Velasco, and R. Colas: “A Metallographic Study of Aging in a Cast Heat-Resisting Alloy,” Mater. Charact., 2000, 45, pp. 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.A. Kenik, P.J. Maziasz, R.W. Swindeman, J. Cervenka, and D. May: “Structure and Phase Stability in a Cast Modified-HP Austenite after Long-Term Aging,” Scr. Mater., 2003, 49, pp. 117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.J. Zhu, J. Zhao, and F.G. Nany: Metall. Trans. A, 1990, 21, p. 2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.W. Martin: Micromechanisms in Particle-Hardened Alloys, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1980.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Solomon and T.M. Devinc, Jr.: “Duplex Stainless Steels—A Tale of Two Phases,” Duplex Stainless Steels, R.A. Lula, ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1983, pp. 693–756.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F.B. Pickering: “Physical Metallurgy of Stainless Steel Developments,” Int. Met. Rev., 1976, 211, pp. 227–68.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Weiss and R. Stickler: “Phase Instabilities during High Temperature Exposure of 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel,” Metall. Trans., 1972, 3, pp. 851–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Chastell and P.E.J. Flewitt: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1979, 38, p. 158.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.T. Gow and O.E. Harder: Trans. ASM, 1942, 30, p. 855.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Gulshan
    • 1
  • Q. Ahsan
    • 1
  • A. S. M. A. Haseeb
    • 1
  • E. Haque
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials and Metallurgical EngineeringBangladesh University of Engineering and TechnologyDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations