Failure analysis of a broken tooth
- 102 Downloads
Several days after heart surgery, a patient discovered his upper right canine tooth had broken at the root. Such tooth damage, recognized post-operatively, is usually assumed to be caused by blunt mechanical force from an instrument used by the anesthesiologist during placement of a breathing tube at the start of surgery.
In this case, the patient had saved the crown portion of the broken tooth, and it was possible to examine the root fracture characteristics. The curvature and direction of the crack path and natural tooth situation suggested that failure could be described through a cantilever beam model. This was confirmed when a whole extracted sample tooth was embedded and broken by a measured force in a manner consistent with the model. The resulting fracture surface matched that of the patient’s broken canine tooth. However, the high load and force direction necessary to fracture the root was inconsistent with forces applied during the anesthesia procedure. The failure analysis and further investigation indicated tooth clenching on the breathing tube during recovery was the likely cause of fracture.
This paper presents an alternate explanation for intubation-related dental injury, demonstrates the practicality of fractographic analysis of biological materials, and introduces a methodology for simulating in vitro tooth settings for mechanical testing.
Keywordsbroken tooth failure analysis of biological materials fractography laryngoscopy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.H. Owen and I. Wadell-Smith: “Dental Trauma Associated with Anaesthesia,” Anaesth. Intens. Care, 2000, 28(2), pp. 133–145.Google Scholar
- 3.P.B. Lockhart, E.V. Feldbau, R.A. Gabel, S.F. Connolly, and J.B. Silversin: “Dental Complications During and After Tracheal Intubation,” JADA, 1986, 112, pp. 480–83.Google Scholar
- 4.R. Ravi, D.V. Subhedar, and C. Gevirtz: “Dental Injury with a Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway,” Am. J. Anesthes., 1999, 26(3), p. 129.Google Scholar
- 5.V. Frechette: “Failure Analysis of Brittle Materials,” Advances in Ceramics, American Ceramics Society, Westerville, OH, 1990, Chapter 28.Google Scholar
- 6.R. Morrell, W.P. Byrne, and M. Murray: “Fractography of Ceramic Femoral Heads,” Ceramic Trans., 2001, 122, p. 253.Google Scholar
- 7.J.R. Kelly: “Fractography of Dental Ceramics,” Ceram. Trans., 2001, 122, p. 241.Google Scholar
- 8.J.R. Kelly, R. Giordanno, R. Pober, and M.J. Cima: “Fracture Surface Analysis of Dental Ceramics: Clinically Failed Restorations, Int. J. Prosthodont., 1990, 3, pp. 430–40.Google Scholar
- 9.J.Y. Thompson, K.J. Anusavice, A. Naman, and H.F. Morris: “Fracture Surface Characterization of Clinically Failed All-Ceramic Crowns,” J. Dent. Res., 1994, 73, pp. 1824–32.Google Scholar
- 10.T.G. Oberholzer and R.J. Rossouw: “Unusual Fracture of a Mandibular Second Premolar: A Case Report,” Quintessence Int., 2001, 32(4), pp. 299–302.Google Scholar
- 11.H.H.W. Ho, F.C.S. Chu, and A.N. Stokes: “Fracture Behavior of Human Mandibular Incisors Following Endodontic Treatment and Porcelain Veneer Restoration,” Int. J. Prosthodont., 2001, 14(3), pp. 260–64.Google Scholar
- 15.“Standard Practice for Fractography and Characterization of Fracture Origins in Advanced Ceramics,” C 1145-01, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
- 17.F. Miura and H. Oyama: “Mechanical Properties of Periodontal Tissues Affected with Orthodontic Forces,” J. Dent. Res., 1975, 54, p. C103.Google Scholar
- 19.C. Misch: Implant Dentistry, Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, 1999.Google Scholar
- 22.F. Romanelli, D.A. Adler, and K.M. Bungay: “Possible Paroxetine-Induced Bruxism,” An. Pharm., 1996, 30(11), pp. 1246–48.Google Scholar