Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 7, Issue 6, pp 817–823 | Cite as

Weldability and toughness evaluation of pressure vessel quality steel using the shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) process

  • R. Datta
  • D. Mukerjee
  • S. Mishra


The present study was carried out to assess the weldability properties of ASTM A 537 Cl. 1 pressure-vessel quality steel using the shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) process. Implant and elastic restraint cracking (ERC) tests were conducted under different welding conditions to determine the cold cracking susceptibility of the steel. The static fatigue limit values determined for the implant test indicate adequate resistance to cold cracking even with unbaked electrodes. The ERC test, however, established the necessity to rebake the electrodes before use. Lamellar tearing tests carried out using full-thickness plates under three welding conditions showed no incidence of lamellar tearing upon visual examination, ultrasonic inspection, and four-section macroexamination. Lamellar tearing tests were repeated using machined plates, such that the central segregated band located at the midthickness of the plate corresponded to the heat-affected zone (HAZ) of the weld. Only in one (no rebake, heat input: 14.2 kj cm-1, weld restraint load: 42 kg mm-2) of the eight samples tested was lamellar tearing observed. This was probably accentuated due to the combined effects of the presence of localized pockets of a hard phase (bainite) and a high hydrogen level (unbaked electrodes) in the weld joint. Optimal welding conditions were formulated based on the above tests. The weld joint was subjected to extensive tests and found to exhibit excellent strength (tensile strength: 56.8 kg mm-2, or 557 MPa), and low temperature impact toughness (7.4 and 4.5 kg-m at-20 °C for weld metal, WM, and HAZ) properties. Crack tip opening displacement tests carried out for the WM and HAZ resulted in δm values 0.36 and 0.27 mm, respectively, which indicates adequate resistance to brittle fracture.


cold cracking crack tip opening displacement impact toughness lamellar tearing restraint intensity sheilded metal arc welding 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Datta, S. Mishra, J. Singh, V. Kumar, and S. Kumar, Production of Pressure Vessel Plates,Steel Techol. Int., 1994-95, p 109–112Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.K. Chaudhuri, R. Datta, A.K. De, and S. Mishra, Recent Efforts in High Strength Steel Development at SAIL,Trans. Indian Inst. Met., Vol 49 (No. 3), 1996, p 207–216Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.J. Cieslak, Cracking Phenomona Associated with Welding,Welding, Brazing, and Soldering, Vol 6,ASM Handbook, ASM International, 1993, p 88–96Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Granjon,Fundamentals of Welding Metallurgy, AbingtonPublishing, 1991, p 156Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Metals and Weldability, AWS Welding Handbook, 7th ed., 1984Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F.R. Coe, Welding Steels Without Hydrogen Cracking,Fundamentals of Welding Metallurgy, Abington Publishing, 1973, p 24–39Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    International Institute of Welding (IIW) Doc. 830–73, 1973Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Myoshi, Influence of Operating Conditions and Mechanical Factors on Centre Segregation of Slabs,Proc. Continuous Casting of Steel, The Metals Society/IRSID, 1976, p 286–291Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.J. Van Vuuren, Operating and Quality Control Aspects of the Production of Critical Low and High Carbon Products from Continuously Cast Blooms,Steelmaking Proceedings, Iron & Steel Society, Warrendale, Vol 61, 1978, p 306–334Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Datta
    • 1
  • D. Mukerjee
    • 1
  • S. Mishra
    • 1
  1. 1.Research and Development Centre for Iron & Steel, RanchiSteel Authority of India Ltd.BiharIndia

Personalised recommendations